journal article Open Access Feb 06, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Using the Propensity Score With Competing Risks in Survival Analysis

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/sim.70009
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score allows estimation of the effect of treatment in observational studies. We had three objectives: first, to describe methods for using IPTW to estimate the effects of treatments in settings with competing risks; second, to illustrate the application of these methods using empirical analyses; and third, to conduct Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the relative performance of three methods for estimating time‐specific risk differences and time‐specific relative risks in settings with competing risks. In doing so, we provide guidance to applied biostatisticians and clinical investigators on the use of IPTW in settings with competing risks. We examined three estimators of time‐specific risk differences and relative risks: the weighted Aalen–Johansen estimator, an estimator that combines IPTW with inverse probability of censoring weights (IPTW‐IPCWs), and a double‐robust augmented IPTW estimator combined with IPCW (AIPTW‐IPCW). The design of our simulations reflected clinically realistic scenarios. Our simulations found that all three estimators tended to result in unbiased estimations of time‐specific risk differences and time‐specific relative risks. However, the weighted Aalen–Johansen estimator and the AIPTW‐IPCW estimator tended to result in estimates with greater precision compared to the IPTW‐IPCW estimator. In our empirical analyses, we illustrated the application of these methods by estimating the effect of statin prescribing on the risk of subsequent cardiovascular death in patients discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
68
[1]
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

Paul R. Rosenbaum, Donald B. Rubin

Biometrika 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
[2]
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies

Peter C. Austin

Multivariate Behavioral Research 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
[21]
Separable Effects for Causal Inference in the Presence of Competing Events

Mats J. Stensrud, Jessica G. Young, Vanessa Didelez et al.

Journal of the American Statistical Association 10.1080/01621459.2020.1765783
[26]
The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect

Richard J Cook, David L Sackett

BMJ 10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452
[28]
Jaeschke R. "Basic Statistics for Clinicians: 3. Assessing the Effects of Treatment: Measures of Association" Canadian Medical Association Journal (1995)
[31]
2018 http://www.bmj.com/about‐bmj/resources‐authors/article‐types. accessed January 24 2025.
[39]
Effectiveness of Public Report Cards for Improving the Quality of Cardiac Care

Jack V. Tu, Linda R. Donovan, Douglas S. Lee et al.

JAMA 10.1001/jama.2009.1731
[49]
Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods

Tim P. Morris, Ian R. White, Michael J. Crowther

Statistics in Medicine 10.1002/sim.8086
[50]
(2005)

Showing 50 of 68 references

Metrics
10
Citations
68
References
Details
Published
Feb 06, 2025
Vol/Issue
44(5)
License
View
Funding
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Award: PJT 183902
Cite This Article
Peter C. Austin, Jason P. Fine (2025). Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Using the Propensity Score With Competing Risks in Survival Analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 44(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70009