journal article Feb 17, 2011

Differences in managerial discretion across countries: how nation‐level institutions affect the degree to which ceos matter

Strategic Management Journal Vol. 32 No. 8 pp. 797-819 · Wiley
Abstract
Abstract
The concept of managerial discretion provides a theoretical fulcrum for resolving the debate about whether chief executive officers (CEOs) have much influence over company outcomes. In this paper, we operationalize and further develop the construct of managerial discretion at the national level. In an empirical examination of 15 countries, we find that certain informal and formal national institutions—individualism, tolerance of uncertainty, cultural looseness, dispersed firm ownership, a common‐law legal origin, and employer flexibility—are associated with the degree of managerial discretion available to CEOs of public firms in a country. In turn, we show that country‐level managerial discretion is associated with how much impact CEOs have on the performance of their firms. We also find that discretion mediates the relationship between national institutions and CEO effects on firm performance. Finally, we discuss two inductively derived institutional themes: autonomy orientation and risk orientation. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
123
[2]
Aguinis H (2003)
[3]
Barnard CI (1938)
[4]
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

Reuben M. Baron, David A. Kenny

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
[6]
Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies

M. Bertrand, A. Schoar

The Quarterly Journal of Economics 10.1162/003355303322552775
[10]
[16]
Coase R "The new institutional economics" American Economic Review (1998)
[17]
Colson E (1974)
[20]
The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields

Paul J. DiMaggio, Walter W. Powell

American Sociological Review 10.2307/2095101
[23]
Durkheim E (1893)
[25]
Ewing J "The bell tolls for Germany Inc.: Cozy relations between business, banks, and labor are unraveling" Business Week (2005)
[26]
Fidler J (1981)
[29]
Fornell C (1994)
[30]
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

Claes Fornell, David F. Larcker

Journal of Marketing Research 10.1177/002224378101800104
[34]
Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial

Paul Geladi, Bruce R. Kowalski

Analytica Chimica Acta 10.1016/0003-2670(86)80028-9
[36]
Gelfand MJ (2004)
[43]
Hambrick DC (1987)
[44]
The Population Ecology of Organizations

Michael T. Hannan, John Freeman

American Journal of Sociology 10.1086/226424
[45]
Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda

Gretchen Helmke, Steven Levitsky

Perspectives on Politics 10.1017/s1537592704040472
[47]
Hofstede G (2001)
[49]
House RJ (2004)
[50]
House RJ (2004)

Showing 50 of 123 references

Cited By
534
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Journal of Business Ethics
Strategic Management Journal
Metrics
534
Citations
123
References
Details
Published
Feb 17, 2011
Vol/Issue
32(8)
Pages
797-819
License
View
Cite This Article
Craig Crossland, Donald C. Hambrick (2011). Differences in managerial discretion across countries: how nation‐level institutions affect the degree to which ceos matter. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 797-819. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.913
Related

You May Also Like

Dynamic capabilities and strategic management

David J. Teece, Gary Pisano · 1997

19,798 citations

A resource‐based view of the firm

Birger Wernerfelt · 1984

15,423 citations

Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm

Robert M. Grant · 1996

10,063 citations