journal article Oct 20, 2014

Collapse‐resistant performance of RC beam–column sub‐assemblages with varied section depth and stirrup spacing

Abstract
SummaryFour reinforced concrete (RC) beam–column sub‐assemblages designed with different span‐to‐depth ratios and two with varied stirrup spacing were tested, and associated pseudo‐static analyses were conducted to investigate their collapse resistance under gravitational loading. The span‐to‐depth ratio was varied from 4.57 to 8.0, and the stirrup spacing was increased from 10 cm to 20 cm. The experimental results indicated that the resistance enhancement decreased with increasing span‐to‐depth ratio in the arch phase and the opposite was true in the catenary resistance. The specimen failed to recover its peak arch resistance in the catenary phase as the span‐to‐depth ratio was reduced to 4.5. Significant shear failure was observed when the stirrup spacing was increased, and it induced premature catenary action under the gravitational loading. The pseudo‐static analysis results suggested that the catenary action was effective only if the peak arch resistance could be recovered. Hence, the peak arch resistance should be regarded as the collapse resistance for RC members with lower span‐to‐depth ratios. Also, the dynamic increase factor increased with plastic deformation and span‐to‐depth ratio in the catenary phase. This indicated that the empirical formulae recommended in current available guidelines are only suitable for alternate load path analysis without considering the catenary action. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
34
[4]
DoD (Department of Defense) (2005)
[5]
DoD (Department of Defense) (2009)
[7]
FadilA.2012.Simplified analysis to predict the behaviour of RC beams under collapse. Master thesis University of Missouri Columbia: Columbia Missouri USA.
[8]
GSA (General Service Administration).2003.Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. Washington DC.
[10]
HeQ.2009.Research on progressive collapse behavior of RC frame structures. Ph. D. thesis Hunan University China.
[11]
Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss — Part I: Simplified assessment framework

B.A. Izzuddin, A.G. Vlassis, A.Y. Elghazouli et al.

Engineering Structures 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.011
[16]
OrtonS StingerS KirbyJ.2013.Static and dynamic disproportional collapse testing of a reinforced concrete frame.Structures Congress 2013 ASCE: Pittsburgh Pennsylvania May 2–4. 10.1061/9780784412848.007
[18]
Qian K "Slab effects on the response of reinforced concrete substructures after loss of corner column" ACI Structural Journal (2012)
[25]
Su Y "Progressive collapse resistance of axially‐restrained frame beams" ACI Structural Journal (2009)
Metrics
22
Citations
34
References
Details
Published
Oct 20, 2014
Vol/Issue
24(8)
Pages
555-570
License
View
Cite This Article
Meng‐Hao Tsai, Yu‐Ting Chang (2014). Collapse‐resistant performance of RC beam–column sub‐assemblages with varied section depth and stirrup spacing. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 24(8), 555-570. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1199
Related

You May Also Like

The damped outrigger concept for tall buildings

Rob J. Smith, Michael R. Willford · 2007

218 citations

Analysis of high‐rise braced frames with outriggers

J. C. D. Hoenderkamp, M. C. M. Bakker · 2003

72 citations