Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking

Christine Chin

doi:10.1002/tea.20171

journal article Jan 03, 2007

Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking

Christine Chin

Journal of Research in Science Teaching Vol. 44 No. 6 pp. 815-843 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/tea.20171

Abstract

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to find out how teachers use questions in classroom discourse to scaffold student thinking and help students construct scientific knowledge. The study was conducted in large‐class settings where the medium of instruction was English although the students were non‐native speakers of the language. Six teachers teaching grade 7 science classes from four schools participated in the study. Thirty‐six lessons covering a range of topics were observed across a variety of lesson structures such as expository teaching, whole‐class discussions, and laboratory work. The lessons were audiotaped and videotaped. Verbal transcripts of classroom discourse were analyzed interpretively. Particular attention was paid to questioning exchanges that stimulated productive thinking in students, as manifested by their verbal responses. A framework was developed that included four questioning approaches adopted by the teachers. This included Socratic questioning, verbal jigsaw, semantic tapestry, and framing. This paper describes these various questioning approaches, their features, and the conditions under which they were used. It also discusses the implications of these approaches for instructional practice. The findings from this study have potential in translating research insights into practical advice for teachers regarding tactical moves in classroom discourse, and provide guidelines for teachers to increase their repertoire of questioning skills. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 44: 815–843, 2007

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

64

[1]

Abell S.K. (2000)

[2]

Alfke D. "Asking operational questions" Science and Children (1974)

[3]

Baird J.R. (1992)

[4]

Barnes D. (1977)

[5]

Barnes D. (1995)

[6]

Biggs J.B. (1996)

[7]

Bloom B.S. (1956)

[8]

Blosser P.E. (1973)

[9]

Bogdan R.C. (1992)

[10]

10.3102/00346543061002157

[11]

Carr D. "The art of asking questions in the teaching of science" School Science Review (1998)

[12]

Chapin S.H. (2003)

[13]

10.1080/09500690600621100

[14]

Cortazzi M. (2001)

[15]

10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(200003)37:3<237::aid-tea2>3.0.co;2-6

[16]

Dantonio M. "Teacher question‐answer strategy and the cognitive correspondence between teacher questions and learner responses" Journal of Research and Development in Education (1988)

[17]

10.1080/0950069032000097424

[18]

10.1021/ed080p1408

[19]

10.1080/0022027820140203

[20]

10.1016/0742-051x(85)90010-1

[21]

Dillon J.T. (1988)

[22]

10.1080/0022027880200301

[23]

10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_1

[24]

Edwards D. (1987)

[25]

Elstgeest J. (1985)

[26]

Gallas K. (1995)

[27]

Gardner H. (1993)

[28]

Gardner H. (1999)

[29]

Glaser B.G. (1967)

[30]

Hogan K. (1997)

[31]

10.1021/ed069p974

[32]

Ko P.Y. (2004)

[33]

Koufetta‐Menicou C. "Teachers' questions—Types and significance in science education" School Science Review (2000)

[34]

Kress G. (1998)

[35]

Lemke J.L. (1990)

[36]

Naturalistic inquiry

Yvonna S. Lincoln, Egon G. Guba, Joseph J. Pilotta

International Journal of Intercultural Relations 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

[37]

10.4324/9781410609762

[38]

10.4159/harvard.9780674420106

[39]

Miles M.B. (1994)

[40]

10.1080/00220973.1980.11011735

[41]

10.1080/0950069980200105

[42]

Mortimer E.F. (2003)

[43]

Paine L. "The teacher as virtuoso: A Chinese model for teaching" Teachers College Record (1990) 10.1177/016146819009200105

[44]

10.1080/0260137920110404

[45]

Pratt D.D. Kelly M. &Wong W.(1998).The social construction of Chinese models of teaching. Proceedings of the Adult Education Research Conference. Retrieved April 29 2006.http://www.edst.educ.ubc.ca/aerc/1998/98pratt.htm

[46]

10.3102/00346543051002237

[47]

10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199609)33:7<709::aid-tea2>3.0.co;2-r

[48]

10.1177/002248718603700110

[49]

10.1080/03057269808560127

[50]

10.1002/sce.3730790505

Showing 50 of 64 references

Cited By

389

Generative AI as a Dialogic Partner: Enhancing Multiple Perspectives, Reasoning, and Argumentation in Science Education with Customized Chatbots

Kok-Sing Tang, Gde Buana Sandila Putra · 2025

Journal of Science Education and Te...

Examining Teacher Questioning in English‐Medium Instruction Classrooms: A Four‐Tier Analytical Procedure

Özgehan Uştuk, Xuejun Ye · 2025

TESOL Quarterly

Understanding linkage between teacher talk moves, discourse contexts and students’ talk productivity

Yilmaz Soysal · 2021

Research in Science & Technolog...

Metrics

389

Citations

64

References

Details

Published: Jan 03, 2007
Vol/Issue: 44(6)
Pages: 815-843
License: View

Authors

C

Christine Chin

Cite This Article

Christine Chin (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171

Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking

You May Also Like