journal article Open Access Apr 01, 2026

PFAS Removal During Pyrolysis of Biosolids Is Affected by Initial PFAS Concentration and Pyrolysis Efficiency

View at Publisher Save 10.1002/wer.70352
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Current and pending biosolids regulations related to per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have triggered the industry to consider emerging biosolids treatment processes. Thermal processes, in particular, have garnered interest for their potential to remove PFAS from the solid phase. Research has documented that pyrolysis can remove PFAS from the solid phase at PFAS concentrations found in non‐industrially impacted biosolids, but little information is available on the fate of PFAS in effluent py‐liquid and py‐gas phases. The objective of this research was to determine the fate of PFAS during pyrolysis of biosolids using non‐industrially impacted and industrially impacted biosolids. Bench‐scale pyrolysis experiments were conducted in triplicate at 500°C and 800°C. PFAS were quantified in the resulting biochar, py‐liquid, and py‐gas. PFAS removal was greater than 95% at both temperatures for the non‐industrially impacted biosolids, but removal was 24%–88% in the industrially impacted biosolids at 500°C. At 800°C, removal was over 95% as well for the industrially impacted biosolids. The biochar yield was highest for the industrially impacted biosolids at 500°C, indicating less conversion of solids to liquid/gas and that the extent of pyrolysis reaction, in addition to initial PFAS concentration, can impact PFAS removal. The mass of PFAS in the effluent liquid and gas for the non‐industrially impacted biosolids was approximately half of the influent PFAS mass, suggesting that a substantial fraction of PFAS is transferred/transformed in the effluent liquid and gas products that would require further polishing for improved PFAS removal.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
79
[6]
Biosolids Assessment and Prepared Study.2021.
[8]
Legacy and Emerging Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Analytical Techniques, Environmental Fate, and Health Effects

Richard A. Brase, Elizabeth J. Mullin, David C. Spink

International Journal of Molecular Sciences 10.3390/ijms22030995
[13]
Historical and current usage of per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): A literature review

Linda G. T. Gaines

American Journal of Industrial Medicine 10.1002/ajim.23362
[14]
An overview of the uses of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)

Juliane Glüge, Martin Scheringer, Ian T. Cousins et al.

Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 10.1039/d0em00291g
[18]
Interim Strategy for Land Application of Biosolids and Industrial Sludges Containing PFAS.2024.
[19]
Interstate Technology Regulatory Council.2020. “History and Use of Per‐ and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Found in the Environment (pp. 1–4).”
[38]
Minnesota Biosolids PFAS Strategy ‐‐ Fact sheet.2025.www.pca.state.mn.us.
[39]
Legacy and emerging per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in Australian biosolids

Damien Moodie, Timothy Coggan, Kathryn Berry et al.

Chemosphere 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129143
[40]
National Toxicology Program.2016. “NTP Monograph Immunotoxicity Associated With Exposure to Perfluorooctanoic Acid or Perfluorooctane Sulfonate.”https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/mgraph04.
[49]
Sabba F. (2024)

Showing 50 of 79 references

Related

You May Also Like

Laboratory Study of Biological Retention for Urban Stormwater Management

Allen P. Davis, Mohammad Shokouhian · 2001

355 citations

Effects of pollution on freshwater aquatic organisms

Patrick Amoatey, Mahad Said Baawain · 2019

228 citations

Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor Technology: Process Applications, Design, and Performance

James P. McQuarrie, Joshua P. Boltz · 2011

147 citations