journal article Apr 02, 2020

Using Ultrasonic Acoustics to Detect Cryptic Flying Squirrels: Effects of Season and Habitat Quality

Wildlife Society Bulletin Vol. 44 No. 2 pp. 300-308 · Wiley
Abstract
ABSTRACT

New technologies allow for more efficient and effective monitoring of rare or elusive species. However, standardizing protocol to ensure high detection rates is important prior to widespread use of a new technique. The use of ultrasonic acoustic detectors to survey for flying squirrels (
Glaucomys
spp.) is a novel method that is more efficient than traditional methods. However, certain methodologies for this technique still need to be refined. During 2015, we conducted a seasonal and habitat quality study on the endangered Carolina northern flying squirrel (
G. sabrinus coloratus
) in western North Carolina, USA. Our seasonal study examined differences in probability of detection (POD) and latency to detection (LTD) at 30 high‐quality sites across 10 survey nights in spring, summer, and autumn. The habitat quality study focused on POD and LTD among 15 sites with varying habitat quality (5 High, 5 Medium, 5 Low) across 20 survey nights. We found POD similar between seasons, with POD 15–20% greater during spring. The LTD was comparable among seasons. We found that POD and LTD varied at sites with different habitat quality. The POD was similar between High and Medium sites (0.26 ± 0.04 SE and 0.29 ± 0.05, respectively), but greater than Low sites (0.02 ± 0.02). The LTD was not different among sites with differing habitat quality, although LTD at High sites was 2.7 and 4.5 times lower than Medium and Low sites, respectively. Trill calls, the most distinctive species‐specific call type produced by species of flying squirrels, was recorded at greater rates in spring versus other times of the year. Our results indicate flying squirrels can be surveyed during any season, although habitat quality needs to be considered when determining survey length. For Carolina northern flying squirrel, the optimal time to perform acoustic surveys is during the spring season for 6–10 survey nights at sites with high or medium habitat quality. © 2020 The Wildlife Society.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
56
[1]
Do you hear what I hear? Implications of detector selection for acoustic monitoring of bats

Amanda M. Adams, Meredith K. Jantzen, Rachel M. Hamilton et al.

Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00244.x
[7]
Diggins C. A. andW. M.Ford.2017. Habitat occupancy and detection rates of northern flying squirrels in Pennsylvania using ultrasonic acoustics. Final Report to Pennsylvania Game Commission Harrisburg USA.
[13]
Ford W. M. (2010)
[18]
Gilley L. M.2013. Discovery and characterization of high‐frequency calls in North American flying squirrels (Glaucomys sabrinusandG. volans): implications for ecology behavior and conservation. Dissertation Auburn University Auburn Alabama USA.
[25]
Hayes J. P. "Assumptions and practical considerations in the design and interpretation of echolocation‐monitoring studies" Acta Chiropterologica (2000)
[26]
Hines J. E.2018. PRESENCE version 12.24: software to estimate patch occupancy and related parameters. U.S. Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.http://www.mbrpwrc.usgs.gov/software/presence.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2018.
[31]
Loeb S. C. "Sampling small mammals in southeastern forests: the importance of trapping in trees" Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (1999)
[32]
ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE

Darryl I. MacKenzie, James D. Nichols, Gideon B. Lachman et al.

Ecology 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:esorwd]2.0.co;2
[34]
McDonald L. L. (2004)
[37]
1968 Museum of Zoology Miscellaneous Publication 134 University of Michigan Ann Arbor USA I. Muul Behavioral and physiological influences on the distribution of the flying squirrel Glaucomys volans
[41]
2015 R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria R Development Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing
[42]
Reynolds R. J. "Demography of northern flying squirrels in Virginia" Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (1999)
[45]
Stihler C. W. (1987)
[47]
U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973 as amended Pub. L. No. 93‐205 87 Stat. 884(Dec. 28 1973).http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa‐library/pdf/ESAall.pdf
[48]
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS].1985. Final rule for listing Carolina flying squirrels and Virginia flying squirrels as endangered. 50 FR 27002 1 Jul 1985.
[49]
1990 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Annapolis Maryland USA U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS] Appalachian northern flying squirrel ( Glaucomys sabrinus fuscus and Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus ) recovery plan
[50]
Urban V. K.1988. Home range habitat utilization and activity of the endangered northern flying squirrel. Thesis West Virginia University Morgantown USA.

Showing 50 of 56 references

Cited By
13
Metrics
13
Citations
56
References
Details
Published
Apr 02, 2020
Vol/Issue
44(2)
Pages
300-308
License
View
Funding
National Park Service Award: #P12AC13175
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Award: #F11AC01265
Cite This Article
Corinne A. Diggins, L. Michelle Gilley, Christine A. Kelly, et al. (2020). Using Ultrasonic Acoustics to Detect Cryptic Flying Squirrels: Effects of Season and Habitat Quality. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 44(2), 300-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1083
Related

You May Also Like

Comparison of survey techniques on detection of northern flying squirrels

Corinne A. Diggins, L. Michelle Gilley · 2016

43 citations

Wildlife Conservation and Management in Mexico

Raul Valdez, JUAN C. GUZMÁN-ARANDA · 2006

43 citations

Identifying migration corridors of mule deer threatened by highway development

Priscilla K. Coe, Ryan M. Nielson · 2015

39 citations

Wildlife agency responses to chronic wasting disease in free‐ranging cervids

Noelle E. Thompson, Miranda H. J. Huang · 2023

20 citations