journal article May 19, 2022

Hunting and environmental influences on survival of male wild turkeys in Virginia and West Virginia

Abstract
Abstract

Knowledge of the effects of hunting and environmental influences on survival of eastern wild turkeys (
Meleagris gallopavo silvestris
) is critical to managers setting fall and spring hunting seasons. Research has shown improper season frameworks can result in unsustainably high harvest rates of adult males, affect male age structure, and result in lower hunter satisfaction. Our objectives were to estimate survival rates of males, identify causes of mortality, and relate hunting and environmental influences to male turkey survival. We captured and radio‐tagged male wild turkeys in Virginia (
n
 = 204) and West Virginia (
n
 = 197), USA, during 2004–2007. We used staggered entry Kaplan‐Meier models to estimate survival and Cox Proportional Hazards Models to estimate effects of predictor variables on survival. Survival was estimated for 3 distinct periods of interest: annual, fall hunting (October–January), and spring hunting (April–May). The leading causes of mortalities (209 turkeys) were legal spring harvest (42%), predation (25%), and poaching (17%). Only 8 turkeys (4%) were taken during fall hunting seasons. Confidence intervals for annual survival of 2 year‐old and 3+ year‐old turkeys overlapped; therefore, we combined adult ages into a single category (2+). Adult (2+) annual survival was 0.63 (95% CI = 0.58–0.69) and the harvest rate was 25% (95% CI = 20–29%) for the combined states. Annual survival rates for adults (2+) were greater than in most other published studies, whereas adult (2+) spring harvest rates were lower. For juvenile males, annual survival was 0.74 (95% CI = 0.68–0.79) and spring harvest rate was 7% (95% CI = 3–11%). High juvenile and adult (2+) survival may have been related to low harvest rates. Adult turkeys (2+) had 46% greater risk of dying than one‐year‐old birds and were 3.7 times more likely to be harvested than juveniles. Age, a relative phenology index (RPI; spring green‐up), and white oak (
Quercus alba
) acorn production were included in the top models for annual survival, spring season survival, and spring harvest risk. Increasing RPI (more foliage) decreased mortality risk and greater white oak (
Quercus alba
) acorn abundance increased mortality risk. Across 4 regions in the 2 states, fall survival was high (0.90, 95% CI = 0.87–0.93). The impact of fall hunting on males in Virginia was low (5% harvest rate, 95% CI = 0–9%). Overall, spring harvest had the greatest effect on male survival, although those effects were moderated by the previous fall white oak crop and the onset of green‐up in the spring.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
43
[2]
Bumann G. B. "Scavenging in ruffed grouse in the Appalachians; Influence and implications" Wildlife Society Bulletin (2002)
[3]
Burnham K. P. (2002)
[7]
Regression Models and Life-Tables

D. R. Cox

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B:... 1972 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x
[10]
Eriksen R. E. A.McBride andG. W.Norman.2011. Survival and hunting mortality of male wild turkeys in New Jersey. Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium 10:173–182.
[12]
Godwin K. D. G. A.Hurst andR. L.Kelley.1991. Survival rates of radio‐equipped wild turkey gobblers in east‐central Mississippi. Proceedings Annual Conference Southeastern Association Fish and Wildlife Agencies 45:218–226.
[13]
Healy W. M. andE. S.Nenno.1980. Growth parameters and sex and age criteria for juvenile eastern wild turkeys. Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium 4:168–185. 10.1002/j.2328-5540.1980.tb00131.x
[14]
Hubbard M. W. andL. D.Vangilder.2005. Survival of eastern wild turkey males in eastern Missouri Ozarks. Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium 9:361–366. 10.1002/j.2328-5540.2005.tb00331.x
[15]
Ielmini M. R. A. S.Johnson andP. E.Hale.1992. Habitat and mortality relationships of wild turkey gobblers in the Georgia Piedmont. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 46:128–137.
[16]
Isabelle J. L. andR. A.Reitz.2015. Characteristics attitudes and preferences of spring wild turkey hunters in Missouri. Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium 11:249–258.
[17]
Kidd Q. E.Harris M.Baer andJ.Howell.2014. Results of the 2013–2014 Virginia Hunter Survey. Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Christopher Newport University Newport News USA.
[18]
Lewis J. B.1980. Fifteen years of wild turkey trapping banding and recovery data in Missouri. Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium 4:24–31. 10.1002/j.2328-5540.1980.tb00117.x
[19]
Lint J. R. "Comparison of abundance indexes and population estimates for wild turkey gobblers" Wildlife Society Bulletin (1995)
[20]
Little D. A. J. L.Bowman G. A.Hurst R. S.Seiss andD. L.Minnis.2000. Evaluating hunting attitudes on Wildlife Management Areas in Mississippi. Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium 8:223–231. 10.1002/j.2328-5540.2000.tb00273.x
[21]
Little T. W. J. W.Keinzler andG. A.Hanson.1990. Effects of fall either‐sex hunting on survival in an Iowa wild turkey population. Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium 6:119–125. 10.1002/j.2328-5540.1990.tb00190.x
[22]
Norman G. W. (2003)
[24]
Norman G. W. (1997)
[25]
Norman G. W. D. E.Steffen C. I.Taylor J. C.Pack K. H.Pollock andK.Tsai.2001. Reproductive chronology spring hunting and illegal kill of female wild turkeys. Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium 8:269–279. 10.1002/j.2328-5540.2000.tb00278.x
[26]
Pack J. C. (1995)
[27]
Pack J. C. andW. K.Igo.2003. West Virginia Mast Survey and Hunting Outlook. West Virginia Division of Natural Resources Wildlife Section Bulletin 03–7 Charleston USA.
[28]
Pack J. C. W. K.Igo R. L.Tucker G. H.Sharp C. P.Carpenter andJ. E.Evans.2004. 2004 Spring Gobbler Season Survey. West Virginia Division of Natural Resources Wildlife Section Bulletin 05–32 Charleston USA.
[30]
Paisley R. N. R. G.Wright andJ. F.Kubisak.1996. Survival of wild turkey gobblers in southwestern Wisconsin. Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium 7:39–44. 10.1002/j.2328-5540.1995.tb00210.x
[32]
R Core Team.2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria.https://www.R-project.org/
[33]
Sharp W. M.1958. Evaluating mast yields in the oaks. Bulletin number 635. Pennsylvania State University Agricultural Experiment Station University Park USA.
[34]
Steffen D. E. (2001)
[36]
Strausbaugh P. D. (1978)
[37]
Suchy W. J. W. R.Clark andT. W.Little.1983. Influence of simulated harvest on Iowa wild turkey populations. Proceedings of Iowa Academy of Sciences 90:98–012.
[38]
Swanson D. A. R. J.Stoll Jr. andW. L.Culbertson.2007. Attitudes preferences and characteristics of Ohio's spring turkey hunters 1985–2001. Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium 9:325–330. 10.1002/j.2328-5540.2005.tb00326.x
[39]
Therneau T.2020. A Package for Survival Analysis in R. R package version 3.1‐12.https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival
[41]
Vangilder L. D. "Population ecology of the eastern wild turkey in northern Missouri" Wildlife Monographs (1995)
[42]
Vangilder L. D. S. L.Sheriff andG. S.Olson.1990. Characteristics attitudes and preferences of Missouri's spring turkey hunters. Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium 6:167–176. 10.1002/j.2328-5540.1990.tb00196.x
[43]
Wright G. A. andL. D.Vangilder.2005. Survival and dispersal of eastern wild turkey males in western Kentucky. Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium 9:367–373. 10.1002/j.2328-5540.2005.tb00332.x
Metrics
3
Citations
43
References
Details
Published
May 19, 2022
Vol/Issue
46(2)
License
View
Funding
Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Award: Pittman‐Robertson Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act
Cite This Article
Gary W. Norman, Daniel Crawford, Christopher W. Ryan, et al. (2022). Hunting and environmental influences on survival of male wild turkeys in Virginia and West Virginia. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1284
Related

You May Also Like

Comparison of survey techniques on detection of northern flying squirrels

Corinne A. Diggins, L. Michelle Gilley · 2016

43 citations

Wildlife Conservation and Management in Mexico

Raul Valdez, JUAN C. GUZMÁN-ARANDA · 2006

43 citations

Identifying migration corridors of mule deer threatened by highway development

Priscilla K. Coe, Ryan M. Nielson · 2015

39 citations

Wildlife agency responses to chronic wasting disease in free‐ranging cervids

Noelle E. Thompson, Miranda H. J. Huang · 2023

20 citations