First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials.

MARLA SANDYS; Ronald C. Dillehay

doi:10.1007/bf01499324

journal article Apr 01, 1995

First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials.

MARLA SANDYS Ronald C. Dillehay

Law and Human Behavior Vol. 19 No. 2 pp. 175-195 · American Psychological Association (APA)

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/bf01499324

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

25

[1]

Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.),Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177?190). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press.

[2]

Bem, D. J., & McConnell, H. K., (1970). Testing the self-perception explanation, of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 23?31. 10.1037/h0020916

[3]

Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979).Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

[4]

Cowan, C. L., Thompson, W. C., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1984). The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation.Law and Human Behavior, 8, 53?79. 10.1007/bf01044351

[5]

Davis, J. H., Kameda, T., Parks, C., Stasson, M., & Zimmerman, S. (1989). Some social mechanics of group decision making: The distribution of opinion, polling sequence, and implications for consensus.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (6), 1000?1012. 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1000

[6]

Davis, J. H., Kerr, N. L., Atkin, R. S., Holt, R., & Meek, D. (1975). The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 (1), 1?14. 10.1037/h0076849

[7]

Davis, J. H., Stasson, M., Ono, K. & Zimmerman, S. (1988). Effects of straw polls on group decision making: Sequential voting pattern, timing and local majorities.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55 (6), 918?926. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.918

[8]

Dillehay, R. C., & Nietzel, M. T. (1980). Constructing a science of jury behavior. In L. Wheeler (Ed.),Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 246?264). Beverly, Hills: Sage.

[9]

Dillehay, R. C., & Nietzel, M. T. (1985). Juror experience and jury verdicts.Law and Human Behavior, 9, 179?191. 10.1007/bf01067050

[10]

Dillehay, R. C., & Sandys, M. (1993).Life under Wainwright v. Witt: Can jurors make the required judgment? Unpublished manuscript.

[11]

Grofman, B. (1976). Not necessarily twelve and not necessarily unanimous: Evaluating the impact ofWilliams v. Florida andJohnson v. Louisiana. In G. Berman, C. Nemeth, & N. Vidmar (Eds.),Psychology and the law (pp. 149?168). Lexington, MA: Heath.

[12]

Hastie, R., Penrod, S., & Pennington N. (1983).Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674865945

[13]

Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966).The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown.

[14]

Kerr, N. L. (1981). Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41 (4), 684?702. 10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.684

[15]

Kerr, N. L., & MacCoun, R. J. (1985). The effects of jury size and polling method on the process and product of jury deliberation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (2), 349?363. 10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.349

[16]

MacCoun, R. J., & Kerr, N. L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberations: Juror's bias for leniency.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 21?33. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.21

[17]

Nemeth, C. (1976). Rules governing jury deliberations: A consideration of recent changes. In G. Bermant, C. Nemeth, & N. Vidmar (Eds.),Psychology and the law. Lexington, MA: Health.

[18]

Nietzel, M. T., & Dillehay, R. C. (1986).Psychological consultation in the courtroom. New York: Pergamon.

[19]

Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980).Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

[20]

Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 84, 231?259. 10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231

[21]

Sandys, M. (1987).Death penalty attitudes and juror voting behavior in felony cases. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.

[22]

Sherif, M. (1936).The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper and Row.

[23]

Tanford, S., & Penrod S. (1986). Jury deliberations: Discussion content and influence processes in jury decision making.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, (4), 322?347. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01144.x

[24]

Tindale, R. S., Davis, J. H., Vollrath, D. A., Nagao, D. H., & Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Asymmetrical social influence in freely interacting groups: A test of three models.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58, 438?449. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.438

[25]

Zeisel, H., & Diamond, S. S. (1978). The effect of peremptory challenges on jury and verdict: An experiment in a federal district court.Stanford Law Review, 30, (3), 491?531. 10.2307/1228114

Metrics

69

Citations

25

References

Details

Published: Apr 01, 1995
Vol/Issue: 19(2)
Pages: 175-195

Authors

Cite This Article

MARLA SANDYS, Ronald C. Dillehay (1995). First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials.. Law and Human Behavior, 19(2), 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01499324

First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials.

You May Also Like