Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes

John Biggs

doi:10.1007/bf01680526

journal article Jul 01, 1979

Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes

John Biggs

Higher Education Vol. 8 No. 4 pp. 381-394 · Springer Science and Business Media LLC

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/bf01680526

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

16

[1]

Atkinson, J. W. (1966). “Learning and the Educational Process”, in Krumbolz, J. D., ed.,Mainspring of Achievement Oriented Activity. Chicago: Rand McNally.

[2]

Biggs, J. B. (1976). “Dimensions of study behaviour: Another look at ATI”,British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 68–80. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02987.x

[3]

Biggs, J. B. (1978a). “Individual and group differences in study processes”,British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48: 00-00. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1978.tb03013.x

[4]

Biggs, J. B. (1978b). “The Relationship Between Developmental Level and the Quality of School Learning”, in Modgil, S. and Modgil, C., eds.,Toward a Theory of Psychological Development Within the Piagetian Framework. Slough, Bucks: National Foundation for Educational Research.

[5]

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. and Krathwohl, D. (1956).Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay.

[6]

Brown, W. F. and Holzman, W. H. (1955). “A study-attitudes questionnaire for predicting academic success”,Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 75–84. 10.1037/h0039970

[7]

Collis, K. F. and Biggs, J. B. (1976). “Classroom Examples of Cognitive Development Phenomena”. Paper presented to the Annual Conference, Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane.

[8]

Collis, K. F. and Biggs, J. B. (in preparation).Classroom Examples of Cognitive Development Phenomena: The SOLO Taxonomy. Final Report, Educational Research and Development Committee, Woden, A.C.T.

[9]

Das, J. P., Kirby, J. and Jarman, R. F. (1975). “Simultaneous and successive synthesis: An alternative model for cognitive abilities”,Psychological Bulletin, 82: 87–103. 10.1037/h0076163

[10]

Entwistle, N. and Wilson, J. (1977).Degrees of Excellence: The Academic Achievement Game. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

[11]

Fransson, A. (1977). “On qualitative differences in learning, IV — Effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome”,British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47: 244–257. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1977.tb02353.x

[12]

Marton, F. (1976). “What Does It Take to Learn? Some Implications of an Alternative View to Learning”, in Entwistle, N. J., ed.,Strategies for Research and Development in Higher Education. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.

[13]

ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS*

F. MARTON, R. SÄLJÖ

British Journal of Educational Psychology 1976 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x

[14]

Peel, E. A. (1971).The Nature of Adolescent Judgment. London: Staples Press.

[15]

Robinson, F. P. (1961).Effective Study. New York: Harper and Row. (Revised edition).

[16]

Svennson, L. (1976).Study Skill and Learning. Göteborg: University of Göteborg, Studies in Educational Science, 19.

Metrics

473

Citations

16

References

Details

Published: Jul 01, 1979
Vol/Issue: 8(4)
Pages: 381-394
License: View

Authors

J

John Biggs

Cite This Article

John Biggs (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes. Higher Education, 8(4), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01680526

Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes

You May Also Like