The theoretical apparatus of semantic realism: A new language for classical and quantum physics

Claudio Garola; Luigi Solombrino

doi:10.1007/bf02275624

journal article Sep 01, 1996

The theoretical apparatus of semantic realism: A new language for classical and quantum physics

Claudio Garola Luigi Solombrino

Foundations of Physics Vol. 26 No. 9 pp. 1121-1164 · Springer Science and Business Media LLC

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/bf02275624

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

55

[1]

C. Garola. “Classical foundations of quantum logic.”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 30. 1 (1991). 10.1007/bf00670756

[2]

C. Garola. “Semantic incompleteness of quantum physics.”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 31. 809 (1992). 10.1007/bf00678546

[3]

C. Garola. “Quantum logics seen as quantum testability theories.”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 31. 1639 (1992). 10.1007/bf00671778

[4]

C. Garola. “Truth versus testability in quantum logic.”Erkenntnis 37. 197 (1992). 10.1007/bf00209322

[5]

C. Garola. “Semantic incompleteness of quantum physics and EPR-like paradoxes.”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 32. 1863 (1993). 10.1007/bf00979507

[6]

C. Garola. “Reconciling local realism and quantum physics: a critique to Bell.”Theor. Mat. Fiz 99. 285 (1994).

[7]

C. Garola. “Criticizing Bell: Local realism and quantum physics reconciled.”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 34. 269 (1995).

[8]

C. Garola. “Questioning nonlocality: an operational critique to Bell’s theorem.” inThe Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Historical Analysis and Open Questions. C. Garola and A. Rossi, eds. (Kluwer Academic. Dordrecht. 1995). p. 273. 10.1007/978-94-011-0029-8_23

[9]

C. Garola. “Pragmatic versus semantic contextuality in quantum physics.”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 34. 1383 (1995). 10.1007/bf00676250

[10]

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen

Physical Review 1935 10.1103/physrev.47.777

[11]

N. Bohr.Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley. New York. 1958).

[12]

N. Bohr.Essays 1958 1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley. New York. 1963).

[13]

W. Heisenberg.The Physical Principles of Quantum Theory (Dover, New York. 1930).

[14]

B. C. Van Fraassen. “A modal interpretation of quantum mechanics.” inCurrent Issues in Quantum Logic. E. G. Beltrametti and B. C. Van Fraassen. eds. (Plenum. New York. 1981).

[15]

R. B. Braithwaite.Scientific Explanation (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 1953).

[16]

C. C. Hempel.Aspects of Scientific Explanation (Free Press. New York. 1965).

[17]

B. Russell.An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth (Allen & Unwin. London. 1940).

[18]

R. Carnap. “Truth and confirmation.” inReadings in Philosophical Analysis. H. Feigl and W. Sellars. eds. (Appleton-Century-Crofts. New York. 1949).

[19]

R. Carnap.Philosophical Foundations of Physics (Basic Books. New York 1966).

[20]

K. R. Popper.Conjectures and Refutations (Routledge & Kegan Paul. London. 1969).

[21]

P. Bush. P. J. Lathi. and P. Mittelstaedt.The Quantum Theory of Measurement (Springer. Berlin. 1991). 10.1007/978-3-662-13844-1

[22]

G. Birkhoff and J. von Neumann. “The logic of quantum mechanics.”Ann. Math. 37. 823 (1936). 10.2307/1968621

[23]

A. Tarski. “The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics.” inSemantics and the Philosophy of Language L. Linsky. ed. (University of Illinois Press. Urbana. 1952).

[24]

C. Dalla Pozza and C. Garola. “A pragmatic interpretation of intuitionistic propositional logic.”Erkenntnis 43. 81 (1995). 10.1007/bf01131841

[25]

M. Jammer.The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley. New York. 1974).

[26]

H. Reichenbach.Philosophic Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (University of California Press. Los Angeles. 1965).

[27]

On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics

JOHN S. BELL

Reviews of Modern Physics 1966 10.1103/revmodphys.38.447

[28]

S. Kochen and E. P. Specker. “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics.”J. Math. Mech. 17. 59 (1967).

[29]

N. D. Mermin. “Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell.”Rev. Mod. Phys.65. 803 (1993). 10.1103/revmodphys.65.803

[30]

On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox

J. S. Bell

Physics Physique Fizika 1964 10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195

[31]

E. P. Wigner. “On hidden variables and quantum mechanical probabilities.”Am. J. Phys.38. 1005 (1970). 10.1119/1.1976526

[32]

F. Selleri. “History of the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.” inQuantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism. F. Selleri. ed. (Plenum. New York. 1988). p. 1. 10.1007/978-1-4684-8774-9_1

[33]

Bell’s theorem without inequalities

Daniel M. Greenberger, Michael A. Horne, Abner Shimony et al.

American Journal of Physics 1990 10.1119/1.16243

[34]

R. K. Clifton, M. L. G. Redhead, and J. M. Butterfield, “Generalization of the Greenberger Horne Zeilinger algebraic proof of nonlocality.”Found. Phys. 21. 149 (1991). 10.1007/bf01889530

[35]

J. J. Sakurai,Modern Quatum Mechanics (Benjamin. Reading. Massachusetts. 1985).

[36]

C. Garola and L. Solombrino. “Semantic realism versus EPR-like paradoxes: the Furry, Bohm-Aharonov. and Bell paradoxes.”Found. Phys. 26. 1329 (1996). 10.1007/bf02058272

[37]

B. D’Espagnat,Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, Reading. Massachusetts. 1976).

[38]

W. M. De Muynck. W. De Baere, and H. Martens. “Interpretation of quantum mechanics, joint measurements of incompatible observables, and counterfactual definiteness.”Found. Phys. 24. 1589 (1994). 10.1007/bf02054787

[39]

H. P. Stapp. “Comments on ‘Interpretation of quantum mechanics, joint measurement of incompatible observables and counterfactual definiteness’.”Found. Phys. 24. 1665 (1995). 10.1007/bf02054788

[40]

D. Aerts. “Description of many physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics.”Found. Phys. 12. 1131 (1982). 10.1007/bf00729621

[41]

D. Foulis, C. Piron. C. Randall. “Realism, operationalism and quantum mechanics.”Found. Phys. 13. 813 (1983). 10.1007/bf01906271

[42]

G. Ludwig,Foundations of Quantum Mechanics I (Springer. New York. 1983). 10.1007/978-3-642-86751-4

[43]

C. Piron.Foundations of Quantum Physics (Benjamin, Reading. Massachusetts. 1976). 10.1007/978-94-010-1440-3_7

[44]

C. Garola. “Embedding of posets into lattices in quantum logic.”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 24. 423 (1985). 10.1007/bf00669903

[45]

K. Bugajska and S. Bugajski. “The lattice structure of quantum logics.”Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré XIX. 333 (1973).

[46]

G. M. Mackey.The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin. New York. 1963).

[47]

J. M. Jauch.Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Addison Wesley. Reading, Massachusetts. 1968).

[48]

C. Garola “Propositions and orthocomplementation in quantum logic.”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 19. 369 (1980). 10.1007/bf00671989

[49]

C. Garola and L. Solombrino. “Yes-no experiments and ordered structures in quantum physics,”Nuovo Cimento 77B. 87 (1983). 10.1007/bf02738421

[50]

G. Cattaneo, C. Dalla Pozza. C. Garola. and G. Nisticó, “On the logical foundations of the Jauch-Piron approach to quantum physics.”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 27. 1313 (1988). 10.1007/bf00671312

Showing 50 of 55 references

Cited By

33

Embedding Quantum Mechanics Into a Broader Noncontextual Theory: A Conciliatory Result

Claudio Garola, Sandro Sozzo · 2009

International Journal of Theoretica...

Locality and Measurements Within the SR Model for an Objective Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Claudio Garola, Jarosław Pykacz · 2004

Foundations of Physics

Embedding Quantum Mechanics into an Objective Framework

Claudio Garola · 2003

Foundations of Physics Letters

A Simple Model for an Objective Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Claudio Garola · 2002

Foundations of Physics

Metrics

33

Citations

55

References

Details

Published: Sep 01, 1996
Vol/Issue: 26(9)
Pages: 1121-1164
License: View

Authors

Cite This Article

Claudio Garola, Luigi Solombrino (1996). The theoretical apparatus of semantic realism: A new language for classical and quantum physics. Foundations of Physics, 26(9), 1121-1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02275624

The theoretical apparatus of semantic realism: A new language for classical and quantum physics

You May Also Like