journal article Jul 01, 1977

A general relation between tensile strength and specimen geometry for concrete-like materials

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/bf02478688
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
19
[1]
Malhotra V. M., Zoldners N. G.—Comparison of ring-tensile strength of concrete with compressive, flexural and splitting-tensile strengths, Journal of Materials, Vol. 2, No. 1, March 1967, pp. 160–199.
[2]
Ramakrishnan V., Ananthanarayana Y., Gopal K. C. —The determination of the tensile strength of concrete: a comparison of different methods, Indian Concrete Journal, Vol. 41, No. 5, May 1967, pp. 202–206.
[3]
Ward M. A., Newman K.—Behaviour of plain concrete subjected to uniaxial tension and compression. II. Interamerican Conf. Mat. Technol., Mexico City, August 1970, pt. 1, pp. 9–22.
[4]
Pineiro M., Vasquez R., Vergara A.—Tension strength of concrete. Comparison between direct tensile, splitting and flexure strength. II. International Conf. Mat. Technol., Mexico City, August 1970, pt. 1, pp. 24–42.
[5]
Popovics S.—Meaning and determination of flexural and tensile strengths of concrete. II. Interamerican Conf. Mat. Technol., Mexico City, August 1970, pt. 1, pp. 43–54.
[6]
Spetla Z., Kadlecek V.—Effect of the slenderness on the direct tensile strength of concrete cylinders and prisms. RILEM Bulletin, No. 33, December 1966, new series, pp. 403–412.
[7]
Kadlecek V., Spetla Z.—Effect of size and shape of test specimens on the direct tensile strength of concrete. RILEM Bulletin, No. 36, September 1967, new series, pp. 175–184.
[8]
Wright P. J. F.—The effect of the method of test on the flexural strength of concrete. Mag. Concr. Res. Vol. 4, No. 11, October 1952, pp. 67–76. 10.1680/macr.1952.4.11.67
[9]
Malhotra V. M.—Effect of specimen size on tensile strength of concrete. Journal of the A.C.I., Vol. 67, No. 6, June 1970, pp. 467–469.
[10]
Walker S., Bloem D. L.—Studies of flexural strength of concrete-Part 3: Effects of variations in testing procedures. Proc. A.S.T.M., Vol. 57, 1957, pp. 1122–1142.
[11]
Kuguel R.—A relation between theoretical stress concentration factor and fatigue notch factor deduced from the concept of highly stressed volume. Prod. A.S.T.M., Vol. 61, 1961, pp. 732–748.
[12]
Kuguel R., Torrent R. J.—On a greater and better use of tests on concrete-like materials specimens (In spanish). III. Interamerican Conf. Mat. Technol., Rio de Janeiro, August 1972, pp. 92–98.
[13]
Neville A. M.—Properties of Concrete, London, Pitman Paperbacks, 1970, pp. 401–403.
[14]
Crow E. L., Davis F. A., Maxfield M. W.—Statistics Manual. New York, Dover Publications, 1960, pp. 152–158.
[15]
Frocht M. M.—Photoelasticity. New York, John Wiley and Sons., Vol. 2, 1957, pp. 125–129.
[16]
Desai C. S., Abel J. F.—Introduction to the finite element method. A numerical method for engineering analysis. New York Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1972.
[17]
Haitz C., Margueirat C., Torrent R. J.—The determination of the distribution of stresses in the French briquette by the finite element method. National Institute of Industrial Technology (I.N.T.I.), Internal report, Buenos Aires, December 1976.
[18]
Duriez M., Arrambide J.—Nouveau traité de matériaux de construction. Paris, Dunod, 1961, pt. 1, p. 759.
[19]
Coker E. G., Filon L. N.—A treatise on photo-elasticity. Cambridge, University Press, 1957, pp. 578–583.
Metrics
16
Citations
19
References
Details
Published
Jul 01, 1977
Vol/Issue
10(4)
Pages
187-196
License
View
Cite This Article
R. J. Torrent (1977). A general relation between tensile strength and specimen geometry for concrete-like materials. Matériaux et Constructions, 10(4), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02478688