Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning

Janette R. Hill; Michael J. Hannafin

doi:10.1007/bf02504914

journal article Sep 01, 2001

Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning

Janette R. Hill

Michael J. Hannafin

Educational technology research and development Vol. 49 No. 3 pp. 37-52 · Springer Science and Business Media LLC

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/bf02504914

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

76

[1]

Allee, V. (1997).The knowledge evolution: Expanding organizational intelligence. New York: Butterworth-Heinemann.

[2]

ALA & AECT (1998).Information power: Building partnerships for learning. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.

[3]

Anderson-Inman, L., & Zeitz, L. (1993). Computer-based concept mapping: Active studying for active learners.The Computing Teacher, 21(1), 6–11.

[4]

Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., & Tarule, J.M. (1997).Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic.

[5]

Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.),Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361–392), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

[6]

Berryman, S.E. (1991).Designing effective learning environments: Cognitive apprenticeship models. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 337 689)

[7]

Beswick, N. (1990).Resource-base learning. London: Heinemann.

[8]

Boettcher, J.V. (1998). The turtle is moving …Syllabus, 12(2), 28, 44–45.

[9]

Boland, R.J., Tenkasi, R.V., & Te'eni, D. (1994). Designing information technology to support distributed cognition.Organization science, 5(3), 456–475. 10.1287/orsc.5.3.456

[10]

Breivik, P.S. (1996). Information literacy: When computers aren't enough.Learning and Leading with Technology, 23, 65–67.

[11]

Breivik, P.S. (1998).Student learning in the information age. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.

[12]

Bruce, B.C., Carragher, B.O., Damon, B.M., Dawson, M.J., Eurell, J.A., Gregory, C.D., Lauterbur, P.C., Marjanovic, M.M., Mason-Fossum, B., Morris, H.D., Potter, C.S., & Thakkar, U. (1997).Chickscope: An interactive MRI classroom curriculum innovation for K-12.Computers and Education, 29(2/3), 73–87 10.1016/s0360-1315(97)00023-7

[13]

Cavalier, R. (1998). Issues and trends.Syllabus, 12(2), 24, 26, 28.

[14]

Chandler, D. (1999).Semiotics for beginners [on-line]. Available:http://www.argyroneta.com/s4b/.

[15]

Chang, S.J., & Rice, R.E. (1993). Browsing: A multidimensional framework.Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, (28), 231–76.

[16]

Cull, P. (1991).Resource-based learning: A strategy for rejuvenating Canadian history at the intermediate school level. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 343 829)

[17]

Dehoney, J., & Reeves, T.C. (1999). Instructional and social dimensions of class Web pages.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 10(2), 19–41. 10.1007/bf02948721

[18]

Dennick, R., & Exley, K. (1997). Tomorrow's doctors today: Innovations in medical teaching and learning—responding to the challenge of tomorrow's doctors.Biochemical Education, 25, 6–11. 10.1016/s0307-4412(96)00149-5

[19]

Dewey, J. (1933).How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. New York: D.C. Heath.

[20]

Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996).The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.), New York, Harper Collins.

[21]

Doiron, R., & Davies, J. (1998).Partners in learning: Students, teachers, and the school library. Englewood Cliffs, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

[22]

Fitzgerald, M.A. (1998).The cognitive process of information evaluation: A collective case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens.

[23]

Francis, J.W. (1997, December/January). Technology enhanced research in the science classroom: Student track down proteins through the Internet maze.JCST, 192–196.

[24]

Fraser, A.B. (1998). Fraser's rule.Syllabus, 12(2), 45, 58–59.

[25]

Freire, P. (1993).Pedagogy of the oppressed: New revised 20th anniversary edition. New York: Continuum.

[26]

Galbreath, J. (1997). The Internet: Past, present, and future.Educational Technology, 37(6), 39–45.

[27]

Gamas, W., & Nordquist, N. (1997). Expanding learning opportunities through on-line technology.NASSP Bulletin, 8(592), 16–22. 10.1177/019263659708159204

[28]

Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (1998).Integrating technology for meaningful learning (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

[29]

Hannafin, M.J., Hannafin, K.M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1997). Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 101–117. 10.1007/bf02299733

[30]

Hannafin, M.J., Hill, J.R., & Glazer, E. (in press). Designing grounded learning environments: The value of multiple perspectives in design practice. In G. Anglin (Ed.),Critical issues in instructional technology. Englewood Cliffs, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

[31]

Hannafin, M.J., Hill, J.R., & Land, S.M. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implications.Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94–99.

[32]

Hannafin, M.J., Hill, J. R., & McCarthy, J. (in press). Designing resource-based learning and performance support systems. In D. Wiley (Ed.),The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

[33]

Hannafin, M.J., & Land, S. (2000). Technology and student-centered learning in higher education: Issues and practices.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 12(2), 3–30. 10.1007/bf03032712

[34]

Hara, K. (1997). A comparison of three methods of instruction for acquiring information skills.Educational Researcher, 39, 271–286. 10.1080/0013188970390303

[35]

Hay, K.E., Guzdial, M., Jackson, S., Boyle, R.A., Soloway, E. (1994). Students as multimedia composers.Computers and Education, 23(4), 301–317. 10.1016/0360-1315(94)90019-1

[36]

Haycock, C.A. (1991). Resource-based learning: A shift in the roles of teacher, learner.NAASP Bulletin, 75(535), 15–22. 10.1177/019263659107553505

[37]

Hill, J.R. (1999a). A conceptual framework for understanding information seeking in open-ended information systems.Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 5–28. 10.1007/bf02299474

[38]

Hill, J.R. (1999b). Teaching technology: Implementing a problem-centered, activity-based approach.Journal of Computing Research in Education, 31(3), 261–279. 10.1080/08886504.1999.10782254

[39]

Hill, J.R., & Cole, J.C. (1997).DOROTHIE: An expert system for training development [technical report]. Houston, TX: Johnson Space Center.

[40]

Hill, J.R., & Hannafin, M.J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4), 37–64. 10.1007/bf02299682

[41]

Jonassen, D., & Reeves, T. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 693–719). New York: Macmillan.

[42]

Kling, R., Rosenbaum, H., & Hert, C. (1998). Social informatics in information science: An introduction.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(12), 1047–1052. 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1998)49:12<1047::aid-asi1>3.0.co;2-v

[43]

Kuhlthau, C.C. (1996). The process of learning from information. In C.C. Kuhlthau (Ed.),The virtual school library: Gateway to the information superhighway (pp. 95–104). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

[44]

Laffy, J., Tupper, T., Musser, D., & Wedman, J. (1998). A computer-mediated support system for project-based learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 73–86. 10.1007/bf02299830

[45]

Land, S.M., & Hannafin, M.J. (1996). A conceptual framework for the development of theories-inaction with open-ended learning environments.Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 37–53. 10.1007/bf02300424

[46]

Land, S., & Hannafin, M.J. (1997). Patterns of understanding with open-ended learning environments: A qualitative study,Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 47–73. 10.1007/bf02299524

[47]

Land, S., & Hannafin, M.J. (2000). Student-centered learning environments. In D.H. Jonassen, & S.M. Land (Eds.),Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

[48]

Lemay, L., & Tyler, D. (2000).Teach yourself Web publishing with HTML 4 in 21 days (2nd ed.) Indianapolis, IN: Sams.

[49]

Ling, P. (1997). Evaluating teaching initiatives which employ resource based learning.UltiBASE [online]. Available: http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/develop/Articles/lingp2.html.

[50]

Linn, M. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The Scaffolded Knowledge Integration Framework.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(20), 103–126. 10.1007/bf02214052

Showing 50 of 76 references

Cited By

237

Improving student creativity through digital technology products: A literature review

Chaoying Tang, Shibo Mao · 2022

Thinking Skills and Creativity

The effects of group metacognitive scaffolding on group metacognitive behaviors, group performance, and cognitive load in computer-supported collaborative learning

Lanqin Zheng, Xin Li · 2019

The Internet and Higher Education

Supporting self‐regulated learning in computer‐based learning environments: systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education

A. Devolder, J. Van Braak · 2012

Journal of Computer Assisted Learni...

A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON SCAFFOLDING FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION

Tzu-Chiang Lin, Ying-Shao Hsu · 2011

International Journal of Science an...

Metrics

237

Citations

76

References

Details

Published: Sep 01, 2001
Vol/Issue: 49(3)
Pages: 37-52
License: View

Authors

Cite This Article

Janette R. Hill, Michael J. Hannafin (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational technology research and development, 49(3), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02504914

Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning

You May Also Like