journal article Apr 01, 1967

Distribution of latex in the plant kingdom

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/bf02897859
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
61
[1]
Addicott, F. T. 1944. A differential stain for rubber in Guayule. Stain Techn.19: 99–102. 10.3109/10520294409105837
[2]
Artschwager, E. 1943. Contribution to the morphology and anatomy of Gua-yule(Parthenium argentatum). U. S. Dept. Agr., Washington, D.C. Tech. Bull. 842.
[3]
Ashplant, H. 1928. Investigations intoHevea anatomy. Bull. Rubber Growers Ass.10: 484–490.
[4]
Bonner, J. & Galston, A. W. 1947. The physiology and biochemistry of rubber formation in plants. Bot. Rev.13: 543–588. 10.1007/bf02861372
[5]
Bouychou, J. G. 1952. The latex forming system and the components of latex by tissue culture. Int. Biochem. Congr., 2e Congr., Paris, p. 316.
[6]
Cameron, D. 1936. An investigation of the latex systems inEuphorbia marginata, with particular attention to the distribution of latex in the embryo. Trans. & Proc. Bot. Soc. Edinb.32: 187–194. 10.1080/13594863609441509
[7]
Carlquist, S. 1958. Anatomy of Guayana Mutisieae. II. Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard.10: 157–184.
[8]
Cook, F. 1943. Natural rubber. Ann. Rep Smithsonian Inst. 363–411.
[9]
Dippel, L. 1865. Entstechungder Milchsaftgefäsze und deren Stellung in dem Gefäszbündelsystem der milchenden Gewächase. Rotterdam.
[10]
Esau, K. 1965. Plant anatomy. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.
[11]
Fairbairn, J. W. 1966. The latex ofPapaver somniferum. (Unpublished paper contributed to the symposium of which a summary of the present article formed a part.)
[12]
Foster, A. S. 1958. Practical plant anatomy. 2nd ed. Van Nostrand. (On pp. 142–150 there are useful practical directions for examining laticifers microscopically.)
[13]
Frey-Wyssling, A. M. 1931. Étude sur la relation existant entre le diamêtre des tubes à latex et la production du caoutchouc dans l’Heveabrasiliensis. Bull. Econ. Indochine34: 341–374.
[14]
Gooding, E.G. B. 1952. Studies on tho physiology of latex. III. Effects of various factors on the concentration of latex ofHevea brasiliensis. New Phytol.51(2): 139–152. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1952.tb06122.x
[15]
Gunnery, H. 1935. Yield prediction in Hevea—a study of sieve-tube structure in relation to latex yield. J. Rubber Res. Inst., Malaya6: 8–20.
[16]
Hammond, B. L. & Polhamus, L. G. 1965. Research on Guayule(Parthenium argentatum) 1942-1959. U. S. Dept. Agr., Washington, D.C. Tech. Bull. 1327.
[17]
Hoffman, 1933. Developmental morphology ofAllium Bot. Gaz.95: 279–299. 10.1086/334386
[18]
Kapoor, L.D. & Sharma, M. 1963.Argemone mexicana L. Organography and floral anatomy with reference to the laticiferous system. Phytomorphology13: 465–473.
[19]
Kaussmann, B. 1963.Pflanzenanatomie. Gustav Fischer Verlag: Jena. (Contains a useful survey on laticiferous elements on pp. 237-247, with bibliography.)
[20]
Lloyd, F. E. 1911. Guayule (Parthenium argentatum Gray), a rubber plant of the Chihuahuan desert. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 139, 213 pp. 10.5962/bhl.title.42144
[21]
Mahabale, T. S. 1949. The laticiferous system ofRegnellidium diphyllum Lind. Curr. Sci.18: 449–450.
[22]
Mahlberg, P. G. 1959a. Karyolinesis in the non-articulated laticifers ofNerium oleander L. Phytomorphology9: 110–118.
[23]
— 1959b. Development of the non-articulated laticifers in proliferated embryosEuphorbia marginata Pursh. Phytomorphology9: 156–162.
[24]
— 1961. Embryology and histogenesis inNerium oleander II. Origin and development of the non-articulated laticifers. Amer. J. Bot.48: 90–99. 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1961.tb11608.x
[25]
— 1963. Development of non-articulated laticifers in seedling axis ofNerium oleander. Bot. Gaz.124: 224–231. 10.1086/336195
[26]
Mann, L. K. & Stearn, W. T. 1960. Rakkyo or Ch’iao T’au(Allium chinense G. Don, syn.A. Bakeri Regel.) a little known vegetable crop. Econ. Bot.14: 69–83. 10.1007/bf02859367
[27]
Metcalfe, R. 1947–48. Lesser rubber plants. Research1: 438–446.
[28]
—, & Chalk, L. 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons (2 vols.). Clarendon Press, Oxford. (Families in which laticifers are known to occur are listed on pp. 1347 and 1349 respectively, and further particulars are given in the text under the families concerned.)
[29]
Milanez, F. R. 1949. Segunda nota sôbre os laticíferos. Lillow16: 193–211.
[30]
— 1952a Sôbre os núcleos dos laticíferos deEuphorbia phosphorea Mart. Rodriguesia15: 163–179.
[31]
—. 1952b. Ontogênese dos laticíferos do caule deEuphorbia phosphorea Mart. Arq. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro12: 17–35.
[32]
— 1954a. Origem das ramificações dos laticíferos do caule deEuphorbia phosphorea Mart. Arq. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro13: 95–113.
[33]
— 1954b. Sobre os laticíferos foliares deFicus retasa. Rodriguesia16– 17: 159–92.
[34]
— 1960–61. Contribuição ao conhecimento anatmico deCryptostegia grandiflora II. Sôbre os laticíferos da estrutura primária (Asclepiaceae). Rodriguesia23–24: 99–128.
[35]
—. & Machado, R. D. 1956. Aplicaçäo da microscopía eletrônica do estudo dos laticíferos embrionários deEuphorbia pulcherrima Willd. Rodriguesia18–19: 425–440.
[36]
— & Neto, H. M. 1956. Origem dos laticíferos do embrião deEuphorbia pulcherrima Willd. Rodriguésia18– 19: 351–395.
[37]
Rao, A.R. & Malaviya, M. 1964. On the latex-cells and latex ofJatropha. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci.60B: 95–106. 10.1007/bf03052354
[38]
Rendle, A. B. 1889. On the vesicular vessels of the onion. Ann. Bot.3: 169–176. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a089989
[39]
Riches, J. P. & Gooding, E. G. B. 1952. Studies in the physiology of latex. I Latex flow on tapping-theoretical considerations. New Phytol.51: 1–10. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1952.tb06111.x
[40]
Ross, H. 1908. Der anatomische Bau der mexikanischen Kautschukpflanze “Guayule”,Parthenium argentatum Gray. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges.26A: 248–263. (The earliest account of the structure of the Guayule plant.)
[41]
Sárkány et al. 1964. Studien über die Feinstruktur der jungen Milchrohren, bzw. des Milchsaftes vonPapaver somniferum L. 3rd Europ. Reg. Conf. Electron Microscopy, 161–162.
[42]
Sassen, M. M. A. 1965. Breakdown of the plant cell wall during the cell-fusion process. Acta Bot. Néerl.14: 165–196. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1965.tb00188.x
[43]
Schmalhausen, J. 1877. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Milchsaftbehälter der Pflanzen. Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petersburg, ser.7, 24: 1–27. (One of the outstanding classical papers on laticifers.)
[44]
Scott, D. H. 1882. The development of articulated laticiferous vessels. Quart. J. Micros. Sci.22: 136–153.
[45]
— 1884. On the laticiferous tissue ofManihot glaziovii (the Ceara Rubber). Quart. J. Micros. Sci.24: 193–203.
[46]
— 1884. Note on the laticiferous tissue ofHevea spruceana. Quart. J. Micros. Sci.24: 204–6.
[47]
— 1886 On the occurrence of articulated laticiferous vessels inHevea. J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.)21: 566–573. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1885.tb00579.x
[48]
Siqueira-Jaccoud, R. J. de. 1956. Contribuição para o estudo daEuphorbia brasiliensis Lam. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz.54: 103–113. 10.1590/s0074-02761956000100005
[49]
Skutch, A. F. 1927. Anatomy of leaf of banana,Musa sapientum L. var. hort. Gros Michel. Bot. Gaz.84: 337–391. 10.1086/333800
[50]
—. 1932. Anatomy of the axis of the banana. Bot. Gaz.93: 233–258. 10.1086/334256

Showing 50 of 61 references

Metrics
151
Citations
61
References
Details
Published
Apr 01, 1967
Vol/Issue
21(2)
Pages
115-127
License
View
Cite This Article
C. R. Metcalfe (1967). Distribution of latex in the plant kingdom. Economic Botany, 21(2), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02897859
Related

You May Also Like

Theories and Major Hypotheses in Ethnobotany

Orou G. Gaoue, Michael A. Coe · 2017

228 citations

Ethnobotany of caiçaras of the Atlantic Forest coast (Brazil)

Silvia C. Rossato, HermóGenes F. De LeitãO-Filho · 1999

181 citations