journal article Dec 01, 2008

Spatial behaviour of European minkMustela lutreola and polecatMustela putorius in southwestern France

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/bf03195195
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
63
[1]
Arambarri R., Rodriguez A. F. and Belamendia G. 1997. Habitat selection, mortality and new contribution to the distribution of the European Mink (Mustela lutreola) in Alava. Estudios del Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Alava 12: 217–225.
[2]
Arthur S. M., Krohn W. B. and Gilbert J. A. 1989. Home range characteristics of adult fishers. The Journal of Wildlife Management 53: 674–679. 10.2307/3809196
[3]
Baghli A. and Verhagen A. 2003. The distribution and status of the polecatMustela putorius in Luxembourg. Mammal Review 33: 57–68. 10.1046/j.1365-2907.2003.00006.x
[4]
Baghli A. and Verhagen A. 2004. Home ranges and movement patterns in a vulnerable poleacatMustela putorius population. Acta Theriologica 49: 247–258.
[5]
Baghli A. and Verhagen A. 2005. Activity patterns and use of resting sites by polecats in an endangered population. Mammalia 69: 211–222. 10.1515/mamm.2005.018
[6]
Birks J. D. S. 1989. What regulates the numbers of feral mink? Nature in Devon 10: 45–61.
[7]
Birks J. D. S. 2000. The recovery of the polecat,Mustela putorius, in Britain. [In: Mustelids in a modern world. Management and conservation aspects of small carnivore: human interactions. H. I. Griffiths, ed]. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 141–152.
[8]
Birks J. D. S. and Kitchener A. C. 1999. The distribution and status of the polecatMustela putorius in Britain in the 1990s. The Vincent Wildlife Trust, London: 1–152.
[9]
Blandford P. R. S. 1987. Biology of the polecatMustela putorius: A literature review. Mammal Review 17: 155–198. 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1987.tb00282.x
[10]
Brzeziński M., Jędrzejewski W. and Jędrzejewska B. 1992. Winter home ranges and movements of polecatsMustela putorius in Białowieża Primaveral Forest, Poland. Acta Theriologica 37: 181–191.
[11]
Buskirk S. W. and MacDonald D. W. 1989. Analysis of variability in home-range size of the American marten. The Journal of Wildlife Management 53: 997–1004. 10.2307/3809601
[12]
Ceña J. C. 2003. Aspectos de la ecología y composición de la poplación de Visón europeoMustela lutreola (Linnaeus, 1761) en la cuenca alta del río Ebro. [In: Proceedings book of the International Conference on the Conservation of European Mink (Mustela lutreola), 5–8 November 2003, Logroño, Spain. G. de La Rioja, ed]. Gobierno de La Rioja, Logroño: 63–84.
[13]
Davison A., Griffiths H. I., Brookes R., Maran T., Macdonald D. W., Sidorovich V. E., Kitchener A. C., Irizar I., Villate I., González-Esteban J., Ceña J. C., Ceña A., Moya I. and Palazón S. 2000. Mitochondrial DNA and paleontological evidence for the origins of endangered European Mink,Mustela lutreola. Animal Conservation 4: 345–355. 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00119.x
[14]
Fournier P., Maizeret C., Jimenez D., Chusseau J. P., Aulagnier S. and Spitz F. 2007. Habitat utilization by sympatric European minkMustela lutreola and polecatsMustela putorius in south-western France. Acta Theriologica 52: 1–12.
[15]
Fournier-Chambrillon C., Chusseau J. P., Dupuch J., Maizeret C. and Fournier P. 2003a. Immobilization of free-ranging European mink (Mustela lutreola) an polecat (Mustela putorius) with medetomidine-ketamine and reversal with atipamezole. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 39: 393–399. 10.7589/0090-3558-39.2.393
[16]
Fournier-Chambrillon C., Dassé B., Delas G., Lanièce S., Letellier Y., Millet P., Pouzenc P. and Fournier P. 2003b. Causes of mortality in free-ranging European mink (Mustela lutreola) from France. [In: Proceedings book of the International Conference on the Conservation of European Mink (Mustela lutreola), 5–8 November 2003, Logroño, Spain. G. de La Rioja, ed]. Gobierno de La Rioja, Logroño: 325.
[17]
Garin I., Zuberogoitia I., Zabala J., Aihartza J., Clevenger A. P. and Rallo A. 2002. Home ranges of European minkMustela lutreola in southwestern Europe. Acta Theriologica 47: 55–62.
[18]
Garland T. 1983. Scaling the ecological cost of transport to body mass in terrestrial mammals. The American Naturalist 121: 571–587. 10.1086/284084
[19]
Gerell R. 1970. Home ranges and movements of the minkMustela vison Schreber in southern Sweden. Oikos 21: 160–173. 10.2307/3543672
[20]
Gittleman J. L. and Harvey P. H. 1982. Carnivore home-range size, metabolic needs and ecology. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 10: 57–63. 10.1007/bf00296396
[21]
Goeta V. and Kranz A. 1999. The European mink (Mustela lutreola) in the Danube delta. Small Carnivore Conservation 21: 23–25.
[22]
Goszczyński J. 1986. Locomotory activity of terrestrial predators and its consequences. Acta Theriologica 31: 79–85.
[23]
Harestad A. S. and Bunnell F. L. 1979. Home range and body weight — a reevaluation. Ecology 60: 389–404. 10.2307/1937667
[24]
Herrmann M. 1994. Habitat use and spatial organization by the Stone marten. [In: Habitat use and spatial organization by the Stone marten. R. A. Powell, ed]. Cornell University Press, Ithaca: 122–136.
[25]
Iman R. L. 1974. A power study of rank transform for the two-way classification model when interaction may be present. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 2: 227–229. 10.2307/3314695
[26]
Janeau G. 1998. Localisation de balises radio-émettrices VHF portées par des mammifères terrestres: principes, précision, limites et contraintes. Arvicola 97: 11–18.
[27]
Johnson D. D. P., Macdonald D. W. and Dickman A. J. 2000. An analysis and review of models of the sociobiology of the Mustelidae. Mammal Review 30: 171–196. 10.1046/j.1365-2907.2000.00066.x
[28]
Kelt D. A. and Van Vuren D. 1999. Energetic constraints and the relationship between body size and home range area in mammals. Ecology 80: 337–340. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0337:ecatrb]2.0.co;2
[29]
Kenward R. E. 1987. Wildlife radio tagging: equipment, field techniques and data analysis. Academic Press, London: 1–192.
[30]
Kenward R. E. and Hodder K. H. 1996. Ranges V. An analysis system for biological location data. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Dorset: 1–66.
[31]
Lindstedt E. R., Miller B. J. and Buskirk S. W. 1986. Home range, time and body size in mammals. Ecology 67: 413–418. 10.2307/1938584
[32]
Lodé T. 1993. Stratégies d’utilisation de l’espace chez le putois européen Mustela putorius dans l’ouest de la France. Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie) 48: 305–322. 10.3406/revec.1993.2109
[33]
Lodé T. 1996. Polecat predation on frogs and toads at breeding sites in western France. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 8: 115–124. 10.1080/08927014.1996.9522922
[34]
Lodé T. 1999. Comparative measurement of terrestrial and aquatic locomotion in Mustela lutreola and M. putorius. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 64: 1–6.
[35]
Lodé T., Guiral G. and Peltier D. 2005. European mink-polecat hybridization events: hazards from natural process? Journal of Heredity 96: 1–8. 10.1093/jhered/esi021
[36]
Macdonald D. W. 1983. The ecology of carnivore social behaviour. Nature 301: 379–384. 10.1038/301379a0
[37]
McNab B. K. 1963. Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size. The American Naturalist 97: 133–140. 10.1086/282264
[38]
Maizeret C., Migot P., Galineau H., Grisser P. and Lodé T. 1998. Répartition et habitats du Vison d’Europe (Mustela lutreola) en France. Arvicola 97: 67–72.
[39]
Maizeret C., Migot P., Rosoux R., Chusseau J. P., Gatelier T., Maurin H. and Fournier-Chambrillon C. 2002. The distribution of the European mink (Mustela lutreola) inFrance: towards a short term extinction? Mammalia 66: 525–532. 10.1515/mamm.2002.66.4.525
[40]
Maran T. 2003a. European mink: setting of goal for conservation and the Estonian case study. Galemys 15: 1–11.
[41]
Maran T. 2003b. Conservation of the European mink,Mustela lutreola, in Estonia: an update 2001–2003. [In: Proceedings book of the International Conference on the Conservation of European Mink (Mustela lutreola), 5-8 November 2003, Logroño, Spain. G. de La Rioja, ed]. Gobierno de La Rioja, Logroño: 131–142.
[42]
Maran T. and Henttonen H. 1995. Why is the European mink disappearing? — A review of the processes and hypotheses. Annales Zoologici Fennici 32: 47–54.
[43]
Maran T., Macdonald D. W., Kruuk H., Sidorovich V. E. and Rozhov V. V. 1998. The continuing decline of the European minkMustela lutreola: evidence for the intraguild aggression hypothesis. [In: Behaviour and ecology of riparian mammals. N. Dunstone and M. Gorman, eds]. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 297–324. 10.1017/cbo9780511721830.018
[44]
Niemimaa J. 1995. Activity patterns and home ranges of the American MinkMustela vison in the Finnish outer archipelago. Annales Zoologici Fennici 32: 117–121.
[45]
Palazón S. 1998. [Distribution, morphology and ecology of European mink (Mustela lutreola) in Iberian Peninsula]. PhD thesis, University of Barcelona, Barcelona: 1–278.
[46]
Palazón S., Ceña J. C., Ruiz-Olmo J., Ceña A., Gozálbez J. and Gómez-Gayubo A. 2003. Trends in distribution of the European mink (Mustela lutreola) in Spain: 1950–1999. Mammalia 67: 473–484. 10.1515/mamm-2003-0401
[47]
Palazón S. and Ruiz-Olmo J. 1998. A preliminary study of the behaviour of the European MinkMustela lutreola in Spain, by means of radiotracking. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 71: 93–105.
[48]
Phillips D. M., Harrison D. J. and Payer D. C. 1998. Seasonal changes in home-range area and fidelity of martens. Journal of Mammalogy 79: 180–190. 10.2307/1382853
[49]
Powell R. A. 1994. Structure and spacing ofMartes populations. [In: Structure and spacing of martes populations. R. A. Powell, ed]. Cornell University Press, Ithaca: 101–121.
[50]
Roger M. 1990. Analyse d’un système proies — prédateur: le modle “lapin — petits rongeurs — putois”. These de l’Université Paris VI, Paris: 1–268.

Showing 50 of 63 references

Metrics
16
Citations
63
References
Details
Published
Dec 01, 2008
Vol/Issue
53(4)
Pages
343-354
License
View
Cite This Article
Pascal Fournier, Christian Maizeret, Christine Fournier-Chambrillon, et al. (2008). Spatial behaviour of European minkMustela lutreola and polecatMustela putorius in southwestern France. Mammal Research, 53(4), 343-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03195195
Related

You May Also Like