Peripersonal space in social context is modulated by action reward, but differently in males and females

Maria Francesca Gigliotti; Patrícia Soares Coelho; Joana Coutinho; Yann Coello

doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01242-x

journal article Sep 06, 2019

Peripersonal space in social context is modulated by action reward, but differently in males and females

Maria Francesca Gigliotti Patrícia Soares Coelho Joana Coutinho Yann Coello

Psychological Research Vol. 85 No. 1 pp. 181-194 · Springer Science and Business Media LLC

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/s00426-019-01242-x

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

75

[1]

Anderson, B. A. (2013). A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 13, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.3.7. 10.1167/13.3.7

[2]

Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (2001). Equilibrium theory revisited: Mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators, & Virtual Environments, 10(6), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601753272844. 10.1162/105474601753272844

[3]

Bailey, K. G., Hartnett, J. J., & Gibson, F. W., Jr. (1972). Implied threat and the territorial factor in personal space. Psychological Reports, 30(1), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1972.30.1.263. 10.2466/pr0.1972.30.1.263

[4]

Contribution of the motor system to the perception of reachable space: an fMRI study

Angela Bartolo, Yann Coello, Martin G. Edwards et al.

European Journal of Neuroscience 2014 10.1111/ejn.12742

[5]

Bassolino, M., Finisguerra, A., Canzoneri, E., Serino, A., & Pozzo, T. (2015). Dissociating effect of upper limb non-use and overuse on space and body representations. Neuropsychologia, 70, 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.028. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.028

[6]

Baumeister, R. F., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.38. 10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.38

[7]

Baxter, J. C. (1970). Interpersonal spacing in natural settings. Sociometry, 33(4), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786318. 10.2307/2786318

[8]

Blini, E., Desoche, C., Salemme, R., Kabil, A., Hadj-Bouziane, F., & Farnè, A. (2018). Mind the depth: Visual perception of shapes is better in peripersonal space. Psychological Science, 29(11), 1868–1877. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618795679. 10.1177/0956797618795679

[9]

Bourgeois, J., & Coello, Y. (2012). Effect of visuomotor calibration and uncertainty on the perception of peripersonal space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(6), 1268–1283. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0316-x. 10.3758/s13414-012-0316-x

[10]

Bourgeois, J., Farnè, A., & Coello, Y. (2014). Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space. Acta Psychologica, 148, 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.008. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.008

[11]

Brozzoli, C., Makin, T. R., Cardinali, L., Holmes, N. P., & Farne, A. (2011). Peripersonal space: A multisensory interface for body-object interactions. In M. M. Murray & M. T. Wallace (Eds.), The neural bases of multisensory processes (pp. 449–466). London: Taylor, & Francis. 10.1201/9781439812174-29

[12]

An Action Field Theory of Peripersonal Space

Rory J. Bufacchi, Gian Domenico Iannetti

Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2018 10.1016/j.tics.2018.09.004

[13]

Byrne, K. A., & Worthy, D. A. (2015). Gender differences in reward sensitivity and information processing during decision-making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 50(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-015-9206-7. 10.1007/s11166-015-9206-7

[14]

Camara, E., Manohar, S., & Husain, M. (2013). Past rewards capture spatial attention and action choices. Experimental Brain Research, 230(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3654-6. 10.1007/s00221-013-3654-6

[15]

Canzoneri, E., Ubaldi, S., Rastelli, V., Finisguerra, A., Bassolino, M., & Serino, A. (2013). Tool-use reshapes the boundaries of body and peripersonal space representations. Experimental Brain Research, 228(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3532-2. 10.1007/s00221-013-3532-2

[16]

Cardinali, L., Brozzoli, C., Urquizar, C., Salemme, R., Roy, A. C., & Farnè, A. (2011). When action is not enough: tool-use reveals tactile-dependent access to body schema. Neuropsychologia, 49(13), 3750–3757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.033. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.033

[17]

Cartaud, A., Ruggiero, G., Ott, L., Iachini, T., & Coello, Y. (2018). Physiological response to facial expressions in peripersonal space determines interpersonal distance in a social interaction context. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00657. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00657

[18]

Chelazzi, L., Perlato, A., Santandrea, E., & Della Libera, C. (2013). Rewards teach visual selective attention. Vision Research, 85, 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.12.005. 10.1016/j.visres.2012.12.005

[19]

Christov-Moore, L., Simpson, E. A., Coudé, G., Grigaityte, K., Iacoboni, M., & Ferrari, P. F. (2014). Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 604–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001

[20]

Cléry, J., Guipponi, O., Wardak, C., & Hamed, S. B. (2015). Neuronal bases of peripersonal and extrapersonal spaces, their plasticity and their dynamics: Knowns and unknowns. Neuropsychologia, 70, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.022. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.022

[21]

Coello, Y., Bourgeois, J., & Iachini, T. (2012). Embodied perception of reachable space: How do we manage threatening objects? Cognitive Processing, 13(1), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0470-z. 10.1007/s10339-012-0470-z

[22]

Coello, Y., & Iachini, T. (2016). Embodied perception of objects and people in space. Towards a unified theoretical framework. In Y. Coello & M. Fischer (Eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition (pp. 198–219). New York: Psychology Press.

[23]

Coello, Y., Quesque, F., Gigliotti, M. F., Ott, L., & Bruyelle, J. L. (2018). Idiosyncratic representation of peripersonal space depends on the success of one’s own motor actions, but also the successful actions of others! PLoS One, 13(5), e0196874. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196874. 10.1371/journal.pone.0196874

[24]

Cooke, D. F., & Graziano, M. S. (2004). Sensorimotor integration in the precentral gyrus: polysensory neurons and defensive movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(4), 1648–1660. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00955.2003. 10.1152/jn.00955.2003

[25]

Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Tieri, G., Sinigaglia, C., & Committeri, G. (2010). Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Experimental Brain Research, 207(1–2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2435-8. 10.1007/s00221-010-2435-8

[26]

De Vignemont, F., & Iannetti, G. D. (2015). How many peripersonal spaces? Neuropsychologia, 70, 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.018. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.018

[27]

Di Pellegrino, G., & Làdavas, E. (2015). Peripersonal space in the brain. Neuropsychologia, 66, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.011. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.011

[28]

Farnè, A., Iriki, A., & Làdavas, E. (2005). Shaping multisensory action–space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia, 43(2), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.010. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.010

[29]

Fisher, J. D., & Byrne, D. (1975). Too close for comfort: Sex differences in response to invasions of personal space. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078634. 10.1037/h0078634

[30]

Dynamic Social Adaptation of Motion-Related Neurons in Primate Parietal Cortex

Naotaka Fujii, Sayaka Hihara, Atsushi Iriki

PLoS ONE 2007 10.1371/journal.pone.0000397

[31]

Fujii, N., Hihara, S., Nagasaka, Y., & Iriki, A. (2009). Social state representation in prefrontal cortex. Social Neuroscience, 4(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910802046230. 10.1080/17470910802046230

[32]

Gabriel, S., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there” his” and” hers” types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.642. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.642

[33]

Gilet, A. L., Mella, N., Studer, J., Grühn, D., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (2013). Assessing dispositional empathy in adults: A French validation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 45(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030425. 10.1037/a0030425

[34]

Graziano, M. S. A. (2017). The space between us. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[35]

Graziano, M. S. A., & Cooke, D. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia, 44(13), 2621–2635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.009. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.009

[36]

Graziano, M. S., Yap, G. S., & Gross, C. G. (1994). Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science, 266(5187), 1054–1057. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7973661. 10.1126/science.7973661

[37]

Grusser, O. J. (1983). Multimodal structure of extrapersonal space. In A. Hein & M. Jeannerod (Eds.), Spatially oriented behavior (pp. 327–352). New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978-1-4612-5488-1_18

[38]

Hall, E. T. (1966). La dimension cachée. Doubleday.

[39]

Hartnett, J. J., Bailey, K. G., & Gibson, F. W., Jr. (1970). Personal space as influenced by sex and type of movement. The Journal of Psychology, 76(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1970.9916831. 10.1080/00223980.1970.9916831

[40]

Hickey, C., & van Zoest, W. (2012). Reward creates oculomotor salience. Current Biology, 22(7), R219–R220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.007. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.007

[41]

Holmes, N. P., & Spence, C. (2004). The body schema and multisensory representation (s) of peripersonal space. Cognitive Processing, 5(2), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-004-0013-3. 10.1007/s10339-004-0013-3

[42]

Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., Wiel, M. A., & Zeileis, A. (2008). Implementing a class of permutation pests: The coin package. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v028.i08. 10.18637/jss.v028.i08

[43]

Hunley, S. B., & Lourenco, S. F. (2018). What is peripersonal space? An examination of unresolved empirical issues and emerging findings. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1472. 10.1002/wcs.1472

[44]

Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., & Ruggiero, G. (2014). Body space in social interactions: a comparison of reaching and comfort distance in immersive virtual reality. PloS one, 9(11), e111511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111511. 10.1371/journal.pone.0111511

[45]

Iachini, T., Pagliaro, S., & Ruggiero, G. (2015). Near or far? It depends on my impression: Moral information and spatial behavior in virtual interactions. Acta Psychologica, 161, 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.003. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.003

[46]

Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., Senese, V. P., Galante, F., & Ruggiero, G. (2016). Peripersonal and interpersonal space in virtual and real environments: Effects of gender and age. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.004. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.004

[47]

Iachini, T., Ruotolo, F., Vinciguerra, M., & Ruggiero, G. (2017). Manipulating time and space: Collision prediction in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Cognition, 166, 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.024. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.024

[48]

Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones

Atsushi lriki, Michio Tanaka, Yoshiaki Iwamura

NeuroReport 1996 10.1097/00001756-199610020-00010

[49]

Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., Won, B. Y., Cistera, J. D., & Rosenbaum, G. M. (2015). Task specificity of attention training: The case of probability cuing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0747-7. 10.3758/s13414-014-0747-7

[50]

Kennedy, D. P., Gläscher, J., Tyszka, J. M., & Adolphs, R. (2009). Personal space regulation by the human amygdala. Nature Neuroscience, 12(10), 1226. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2381. 10.1038/nn.2381

Showing 50 of 75 references

Cited By

22

Spatial captivity: When consumers dislike or like feeling constrained by material surroundings in service settings

Martin P. Fritze, André Marchand · 2026

International Journal of Research i...

Metrics

22

Citations

75

References

Details

Published: Sep 06, 2019
Vol/Issue: 85(1)
Pages: 181-194
License: View

Authors

M

Maria Francesca Gigliotti

P

Patrícia Soares Coelho

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche Award: ANR-11-EQPX-0023

Cite This Article

Maria Francesca Gigliotti, Patrícia Soares Coelho, Joana Coutinho, et al. (2019). Peripersonal space in social context is modulated by action reward, but differently in males and females. Psychological Research, 85(1), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01242-x

Peripersonal space in social context is modulated by action reward, but differently in males and females

You May Also Like