Instructional support in inquiry-based elementary school science classes: how does it relate to students’ science content knowledge and academic language proficiency?

Birgit Heppt; Sofie Henschel; Ilonca Hardy; Katrin Gabler

doi:10.1007/s10212-022-00653-6

journal article Open Access Dec 03, 2022

Instructional support in inquiry-based elementary school science classes: how does it relate to students’ science content knowledge and academic language proficiency?

Birgit Heppt

Sofie Henschel

Ilonca Hardy

Katrin Gabler

European Journal of Psychology of Education Vol. 38 No. 4 pp. 1377-1401 · Springer Science and Business Media LLC

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/s10212-022-00653-6

Abstract

AbstractInquiry-based science instruction has been proposed as an optimal learning environment for language-integrated teaching. While its potential for developing both content knowledge and language skills has been shown for students with limited language proficiency, research focusing on mainstream classrooms has mainly considered domain-specific learning. Despite the effectiveness of inquiry-based science instruction for student outcomes, research on the role of specific aspects of instructional quality is limited. Addressing this research gap, the present study investigates the relationship between teachers’ instructional support during inquiry-based science classes and elementary school students’ learning gains in science content knowledge and academic language proficiency. Multilevel regression analyses are based on data from 459 German elementary school students from Grades 3 and 4 who participated in a longitudinal intervention study that took place over one school year. Our findings indicate a strong impact of students’ prior knowledge on learning outcomes and compositional effects for the language-related measures. Relations between teachers’ instructional support, as measured by the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS; Pianta et al., 2008), and students’ learning outcomes did not emerge. In interpreting the results, the overall mediocre quality of teachers’ instructional support needs to be considered.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

107

[1]

Adams, R. J., Wu, M. L., Macaskill, G., Haldane, S. A., & Sun, X. S. (2015). ACER ConQuest: Generalised item response modelling software. (Version 4) [Computer software]. Australian Council for Educational Research.

[2]

Adams, R. J., Wu, M. L., Cloney, D., & Wilson, M. R. (2020). ACER ConQuest 5. Generalised item response modelling software. (Version 5) [Computer software]. Australian Council for Educational Research.

[3]

Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2013). Observations of effective teacher-student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the Classroom Assessment Scoring System—Secondary. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087492 10.1080/02796015.2013.12087492

[4]

Alvarez, L., Catechis, N., Chu, H., Hamburger, L., Herpin, S. A., & Walqui, A. (2012). Quality teaching for English learners (QTEL) impact study. WestEd. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3229.6320 10.13140/2.1.3229.6320

[5]

Ardasheva, Y., Newcomer, S. N., Firestone, J. B., & Lamb, R. L. (2017). Mediation in the relationship among EL status, vocabulary, and science reading comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(6), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1175407 10.1080/00220671.2016.1175407

[6]

Ardasheva, Y., Newcomer, S. N., Firestone, J. B., & Lamb, R. L. (2019). Contributions of language-specific and metacognitive skills to science reading comprehension of middle school English learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 42(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2019.1597774 10.1080/15235882.2019.1597774

[7]

August, D., Branum-Martin, L., Cardenas-Hagan, E., & Francis, D. J. (2009). The impact of an instructional intervention on the science and language learning of middle grade English language learners. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740903217623 10.1080/19345740903217623

[8]

August, D., Branum-Martin, L., Cárdenas-Hagan, E., Francis, D. J., Powell, J., Moore, S., & Haynes, E. F. (2014). Helping ELLs meet the common core state standards for literacy in science: The impact of an instructional intervention focused on academic language. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(1), 54–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2013.836763 10.1080/19345747.2013.836763

[9]

Babinski, L. M., Amendum, S. J., Knotek, S. E., Sánchez, M., & Malone, P. (2018). Improving young English learners’ language and literacy skills through teacher professional development: A randomized controlled trial. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217732335 10.3102/0002831217732335

[10]

Bailey, A. L. (Ed.). (2007). The language demands of school. Putting academic English to the test. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211404199. 10.1177/0265532211404199

[11]

Becker, M., Kocaj, A., Jansen, M., Dumont, H., & Lüdtke, O. (2022). Class-average achievement and individual achievement development: Testing achievement composition and peer spillover effects using five German longitudinal studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(1), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000519 10.1037/edu0000519

[12]

Becker-Mrotzek, M., & Roth, H.-J. (2017). Sprachliche Bildung – Grundlegende Begriffe und Konzepte [Language support across the curriculum – Basic terms and concepts]. In M. Becker-Mrotzek & H.-J. Roth (Eds.), Sprachliche Bildung – Grundlagen und Handlungsfelder (pp. 11–36). Waxmann. 10.31244/9783830983897

[13]

Bihler, L. M., Agache, A., Schneller, K., Willard, J. A., & Leyendecker, B. (2018). Expressive morphological skills of dual language learning and monolingual German children: Exploring links to duration of preschool attendance, classroom quality, and classroom composition. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 888. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00888 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00888

[14]

Bravo, M. A., & Cervetti, G. N. (2014). Attending to the language and literacy needs of English learners in science. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(2), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2014.900418 10.1080/10665684.2014.900418

[15]

Bunch, G. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37, 298–341. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12461772 10.3102/0091732x12461772

[16]

Burchinal, M., Vandergrift, N., Pianta, R., & Mashburn, A. (2010). Threshold analysis of association between child care quality and child outcomes for low-income children in pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECRESQ.2009.10.004 10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.10.004

[17]

mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations inR

Stef van Buuren, Karin Groothuis-Oudshoorn

Journal of Statistical Software 10.18637/jss.v045.i03

[18]

Cadima, J., Leal, T., & Burchinal, M. (2010). The quality of teacher-student interactions: Associations with first graders’ academic and behavioral outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 48(6), 457–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.09.001 10.1016/j.jsp.2010.09.001

[19]

Decristan, J., Hondrich, A. L., Büttner, G., Hertel, S., Klieme, E., Kunter, M., Lühken, A., Adl-Amini, K., Djakovic, S.-K., Mannel, S., Naumann, A., & Hardy, I. (2015). Impact of additional guidance in science education on primary students’ conceptual understanding. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(5), 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.899957 10.1080/00220671.2014.899957

[20]

Eckhardt, A. G. (2008). Sprache als Barriere für den schulischen Erfolg. Potentielle Schwierigkeiten beim Erwerb schulbezogener Sprache für Kinder mit Migrationshintergrund [Language as a barrier for academic success. Potential difficulties in acquiring academic language competence for students with a migration background]. Waxmann.

[21]

Estrella, G., Au, J., Jaeggi, S. M., & Collins, P. (2018). Is inquiry science instruction effective for English language learners? A Meta-Analytic Review. AERA Open, 4(2), 2332858418767402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418767402 10.1177/2332858418767402

[22]

Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:18135 10.25656/01:18135

[23]

Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A., Büttner, G., Klieme, E., Hardy, I., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882 10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882

[24]

Fauth, B., Atlay, C., Dumont, H., & Decristan, J. (2021). Does what you get depend on who you are with? Effects of student composition on teaching quality. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101355 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101355

[25]

Fischer, L., Rohm, T., Gnambs, T., & Carstensen, C. H. (2016). Linking the data of the competence tests (NEPS Survey Paper No. 1). Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories, National Educational Panel Study. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28728.96004 10.13140/rg.2.2.28728.96004

[26]

Foster, T. J., Burchinal, M., & Yazejian, N. (2020). The relation between classroom age composition and children’s language and behavioral outcomes: Examining peer effects. Child Development, 91(6), 2103–2122. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13410 10.1111/cdev.13410

[27]

Francis, D., & Stephens, E. (2018). English learners in STEM subjects: Transforming classrooms, schools, and lives. The National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/2518 10.17226/2518

[28]

Frändberg, B., Lincoln, P., & Wallin, A. (2013). Linguistic resources used in grade 8 students’ submicro level explanations—Science items from TIMSS 2007. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2387–2406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9363-0 10.1007/s11165-013-9363-0

[29]

Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206 10.3102/0034654312457206

[30]

A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status

Harry B.G. Ganzeboom, Paul M. De Graaf, Donald J. Treiman

Social Science Research 1992 10.1016/0049-089x(92)90017-b

[31]

Garza, T., Huerta, M., Lara-Alecio, R., Irby, B. J., & Tong, F. (2018). Pedagogical differences during a science and language intervention for English language learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(4), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1302913 10.1080/00220671.2017.1302913

[32]

Geary, D. C., Nicholas, A., Li, Y., & Sun, J. (2017). Developmental change in the influence of domain-general abilities and domain-specific knowledge on mathematics achievement: An eight-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000159 10.1037/edu0000159

[33]

Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Heinemann.

[34]

Golinkoff, R. M., Hoff, E., Rowe, M. L., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2018). Language matters: Denying the existence of the 30-million-word gap has serious consequences. Child Development, 90(3), 985–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13128 10.1111/cdev.13128

[35]

Grund, S., Lüdtke, O., & Robitzsch, A. (2017). Multiple imputation of missing data for multilevel models. Organizational Research Methods, 21(1), 111–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117703686 10.1177/1094428117703686

[36]

Grund, S., Robitzsch, A., & Lüdtke, O. (2021). mitml: Tools for multiple imputation in multilevel modeling. (R package version 0.4–1) [Computer software]. Retrieved August 17, 2022, from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mitml/index.html

[37]

Null relations between CLASS scores and gains in children’s language, math, and executive function skills: A replication and extension study

Paola Guerrero-Rosada, Christina Weiland, Meghan McCormick et al.

Early Childhood Research Quarterly 2021 10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.07.009

[38]

Guo, Y., Wang, S., Hall, A. H., Breit-Smith, A., & Busch, J. (2015). The effects of science instruction on young children’s vocabulary learning: A research synthesis. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(4), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0721-6 10.1007/s10643-015-0721-6

[39]

Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., Markman, J. M., & Rivkin, S. G. (2003). Does peer ability affect student achievement? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(5), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.741 10.1002/jae.741

[40]

Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Möller, K., & Stern, E. (2006). Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students’ understanding of “floating and sinking”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.307 10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.307

[41]

Haug, B. S., & Ødegaard, M. (2014). From words to concepts: Focusing on word knowledge when teaching for conceptual understanding within an inquiry-based science setting. Research in Science Education, 44(5), 777–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9402-5 10.1007/s11165-014-9402-5

[42]

Henrichs, L. F., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2014). Early science instruction and academic language development can go hand in hand. The promising effects of a low-intensity teacher-focused intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 36(17), 2978–2995. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.948944 10.1080/09500693.2014.948944

[43]

Heppt, B., Köhne-Fuetterer, J., Eglinsky, J., Volodina, A., Stanat, P., & Weinert, S. (2020). BiSpra 2-4. Test zur Erfassung bildungssprachlicher Kompetenzen bei Grundschulkindern der Jahrgangsstufen 2 bis 4 [BiSpra 2-4. Test for the assessment of academic language skills for elementary school children from grades 2 through 4]. Waxmann.

[44]

Heppt, B., Henschel, S., Hardy, I., Hettmannsperger-Lippolt, R., Gabler, K., Sontag, C., Mannel, S., & Stanat, P. (2022). Professional development for language support in science classrooms: Evaluating effects for elementary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103518 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103518

[45]

Hill, H. C., Charalambous, C. Y., & Kraft, M. A. (2012). When rater reliability is not enough: Teacher observation systems and a case for the generalizability study. Educational Researcher, 41(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12437203 10.3102/0013189x12437203

[46]

Hox, J. J. (1998). Multilevel modeling: When and why. In I. Balderjahn, R. Mathar, & M. Schader (Eds.), Classification, data analysis, and data highways (pp. 147–154). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-72087-1_17

[47]

Hu, B. Y., Fan, X., Gu, C., & Yang, N. (2016). Applicability of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System in Chinese preschools based on psychometric evidence. Early Education and Development, 27(5), 714–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1113069 10.1080/10409289.2016.1113069

[48]

Kalinowski, E., Egert, F., Gronostaj, A., & Vock, M. (2020). Professional development on fostering students’ academic language proficiency across the curriculum—A meta-analysis of its impact on teachers’ cognition and teaching practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102971 10.1016/j.tate.2019.102971

[49]

Kempert, S., Schalk, L., & Saalbach, H. (2019). Sprache als Werkzeug des Lernens: Ein Überblick zu den kommunikativen und kognitiven Funktionen der Sprache und deren Bedeutung für den fachlichen Wissenserwerb [Language as a tool for learning: A review of the communicative and cognitive functions of language and its relevance for academic learning]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 65, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2378/peu2018.art19d 10.2378/peu2018.art19d

[50]

Kleickmann, T., Hardy, I., Möller, K., Pollmeier, J., Tröbst, S., & Beinbrech, C. (2010). Die Modellierung naturwissenschaftlicher Kompetenz im Grundschulalter: Theoretische Konzeption und Testkonstruktion [Modeling scientific competence of primary school children: Theoretical background and test construction]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 265–283.

Showing 50 of 107 references

Metrics

10

Citations

107

References

Details

Published: Dec 03, 2022
Vol/Issue: 38(4)
Pages: 1377-1401
License: View

Authors

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Award: 01JI1602A

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Cite This Article

Birgit Heppt, Sofie Henschel, Ilonca Hardy, et al. (2022). Instructional support in inquiry-based elementary school science classes: how does it relate to students’ science content knowledge and academic language proficiency?. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(4), 1377-1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00653-6

Instructional support in inquiry-based elementary school science classes: how does it relate to students’ science content knowledge and academic language proficiency?

You May Also Like