journal article Aug 11, 2021

Do Voters Trust Deliberative Minipublics? Examining the Origins and Impact of Legitimacy Perceptions for the Citizens’ Initiative Review

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/s11109-021-09742-6
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
103
[1]
Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2017). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400888740
[2]
Adams, B. (2004). Public meetings and the democratic process. Public Administration Review, 64, 43–54. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00345.x
[3]
Bagg, S. (2018). The power of the multitude: Answering epistemic challenges to democracy (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3245406). Social science research network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3245406
[4]
Bedock, C., & Pilet, J.-B. (2021). Who supports citizens selected by lot to be the main policymakers? A study of French citizens. Government and Opposition, 56(3), 485–504. 10.1017/gov.2020.1
[5]
Black, L. W. (2008). Deliberation, storytelling, and dialogic moments. Communication Theory, 18(1), 93–116. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00315.x
[6]
Böker, M. (2017). Justification, critique and deliberative legitimacy: The limits of mini-publics. Contemporary Political Theory, 16(1), 19–40. 10.1057/cpt.2016.11
[7]
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2017). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield.
[8]
Boulianne, S. (2018). Mini-publics and public opinion: two survey-based experiments. Political Studies, 66(1), 119–136. 10.1177/0032321717723507
[9]
Boulianne, S. (2019). Building faith in democracy: Deliberative events, political trust and efficacy. Political Studies, 67(1), 4–30. 10.1177/0032321718761466
[10]
Braithwaite, V., & Levi, M. (2003). Trust and governance. Russell Sage Foundation.
[11]
Caluwaerts, D., & Reuchamps, M. (2016). Generating democratic legitimacy through deliberative innovations: The role of embeddedness and disruptiveness. Representation, 52(1), 13–27. 10.1080/00344893.2016.1244111
[12]
Chakravarti, S. (2019). Radical enfranchisement in the jury room and public life. University of Chicago Press.
[13]
How citizens evaluate participatory processes: a conjoint analysis

Henrik Serup Christensen

European Political Science Review 2020 10.1017/s1755773920000107
[14]
Christensen, H. S., Karjalainen, M., & Nurminen, L. (2015). Does crowdsourcing legislation increase political legitimacy? The case of avoin ministeriö in finland. Policy & Internet, 7(1), 25–45. 10.1002/poi3.80
[15]
Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12, 289–314. 10.1007/bf00992337
[16]
Crosby, N. (1995). Citizens Juries: One solution for difficult environmental questions. In O. Renn, T. Webler, & P. Wiedemann (Eds.), Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse (pp. 157–174). Kluwer Academic. 10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_8
[17]
Curato, N., & Böker, M. (2016). Linking mini-publics to the deliberative system: A research agenda. Policy Sciences, 49(2), 173–190. 10.1007/s11077-015-9238-5
[18]
Cutler, F., Johnston, R., Carty, R. K., Blais, A., & Fournier, P. (2008). Deliberation, information, and trust: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly as agenda setter. In M. E. Warren & H. Pearse (Eds.), Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly (pp. 166–191). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/cbo9780511491177.010
[19]
de Tocqueville, A. (1835). Democracy in America. Schocken.
[20]
Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 141–155. 10.1353/jod.2015.0009
[21]
The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation

John S. Dryzek, André Bächtiger, Simone Chambers et al.

Science 2019 10.1126/science.aaw2694
[22]
Du Bois, W. E. B. (1903). The souls of Black folk: Essays and sketches. A. C. McClurg.
[23]
Dzur, A. W. (2012). Punishment, participatory democracy, and the jury. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199874095.001.0001
[24]
Eliasoph, N. 1998. Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/cbo9780511583391
[25]
Farrell, D. M., & Suiter, J. (2019). Reimagining democracy: Lessons in deliberative democracy from the Irish front line. Cornell University Press. 10.7591/9781501749346
[26]
Felicetti, A., Niemeyer, S., & Curato, N. (2016). Improving deliberative participation: Connecting mini-publics to deliberative systems. European Political Science Review, 8(3), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773915000119 10.1017/s1755773915000119
[27]
Fishkin, J. S. (2018a). Democracy when the people are thinking: revitalizing our politics through public deliberation. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198820291.001.0001
[28]
Fishkin, J. S. (2018b). Random assemblies for lawmaking? Prospects and limits. Politics & Society, 46(3), 359–379. 10.1177/0032329218789889
[29]
Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2017). The signs of deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 5–15. 10.1353/jod.2017.0000
[30]
Fournier, P., van der Kolk, H., Carty, R. K., Blais, A., & Rose, J. (2011). When citizens decide: Lessons from citizen assemblies on electoral reform. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567843.001.0001
[31]
Friedman, W., & Schleifer, D. (2019). America’s hidden common ground on divisiveness in American public life. Public Agenda.
[32]
Fung, A. (2005). Deliberation before the revolution—Toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world. Political Theory, 33, 397–419. 10.1177/0090591704271990
[33]
Fung, A. (2007). Minipublics: Deliberative designs and their consequences. In S. W. Rosenberg (Ed.), Deliberation, participation and democracy: Can the people govern? (pp. 159–183). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230591080_8
[35]
Gastil, J., Bacci, C., & Dollinger, M. (2010). Is deliberation neutral? Patterns of attitude change during “The Deliberative Polls.” Journal of Public Deliberation, 6(2). https://delibdemjournal.org/articles/abstract/107/ 10.16997/jdd.107
[36]
Gastil, J., Deess, E. P., Weiser, P. J., & Simmons, C. (2010). The jury and democracy: How jury deliberation promotes civic engagement and political participation. Oxford University Press.
[37]
Gastil, J., & Knobloch, K. (2020). Hope for democracy: How citizens can bring reason back into politics. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190084523.001.0001
[38]
Assessing the Electoral Impact of the 2010 Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review

John Gastil, Katherine R. Knobloch, Justin Reedy et al.

American Politics Research 2018 10.1177/1532673x17715620
[39]
Gastil, J., & Levine, P. (Eds.). (2005). The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the Twenty-First Century. Jossey-Bass.
[40]
Gastil, J., Rosenzweig, E., Knobloch, K. R., & Brinker, D. (2016). Does the public want mini-publics? Voter responses to the Citizens’ Initiative Review. Communication and the Public, 1(2), 174–192. 10.1177/2057047316648329
[41]
Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens

Martin Gilens, Benjamin I. Page

Perspectives on Politics 2014 10.1017/s1537592714001595
[42]
Goodin, R. E., & Dryzek, J. S. (2006). Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics and Society, 34, 219–244. 10.1177/0032329206288152
[43]
Grönlund, K., Bachtiger, A., & Setälä, M. (Eds.). (2014). Deliberative mini-publics: Involving citizens in the democratic process. ECPR Press.
[44]
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (2012). The spirit of compromise: Why governing demands it and campaigning undermines it. Princeton University Press.
[45]
Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation crisis (T. A. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.
[46]
Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2010). Winner-take-all politics: public policy, political organization, and the precipitous rise of top incomes in the United States. Politics & Society, 38(2), 152–204. 10.1177/0032329210365042
[47]
Hale, D. (2016). The jury in America: Triumph and decline. University Press of Kansas. 10.1353/book44731
[48]
Hamm, J. A., PytlikZillig, L. M., Tomkins, A. J., Herian, M. N., Bornstein, B. H., & Neeley, E. M. (2011). Exploring separable components of institutional confidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29(1), 95–115. 10.1002/bsl.965
[49]
Herian, M. N., Hamm, J. A., Tomkins, A. J., & Zillig, L. M. P. (2012). Public participation, procedural fairness, and evaluations of local governance: The moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 815–840. 10.1093/jopart/mur064
[50]
Himmelroos, S. (2017). Discourse quality in deliberative citizen forums: A comparison of four deliberative mini-publics. Journal of Public Deliberation, 13(1). http://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/541/ 10.16997/jdd.269

Showing 50 of 103 references

Metrics
22
Citations
103
References
Details
Published
Aug 11, 2021
Vol/Issue
45(3)
Pages
975-994
License
View
Funding
Pennsylvania State University
Cite This Article
Kristinn Már, John Gastil (2021). Do Voters Trust Deliberative Minipublics? Examining the Origins and Impact of Legitimacy Perceptions for the Citizens’ Initiative Review. Political Behavior, 45(3), 975-994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09742-6