How Smart Governance Shapes Resident Wellbeing: The Mediating Role of Institutional Trust

Yang Xin; Hu Weina; Deng Yan; Deng Shusheng

doi:10.1007/s11205-026-03830-y

journal article Mar 01, 2026

How Smart Governance Shapes Resident Wellbeing: The Mediating Role of Institutional Trust

Yang Xin

Hu Weina

Deng Yan

Deng Shusheng

Social Indicators Research Vol. 182 No. 2 · Springer Science and Business Media LLC

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/s11205-026-03830-y

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

45

[1]

Bai, X., & Yang, L. (2025). Digital literacy’s impact on digital village participation in rural left-behind women through serial mediation of political trust and self-efficacy. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Article 34226. 10.1038/s41598-025-16093-3

[2]

Bi, S., Maes, M., Stevens, G. W., de Heer, C., Li, J. B., Sun, Y., & Finkenauer, C. (2025). Trust and subjective well-being across the lifespan: A multilevel meta-analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations. Psychological Bulletin, 151(6), 737–766. 10.1037/bul0000480

[3]

Biswas, B., Nur Ullah, M., Rahman, M. M., & Al Masud, A. (2024). Service quality, satisfaction, and intention to use Pourasava Digital Center in Bangladesh: The moderating effect of citizen participation. PloS one, 19(6), e0304178. 10.1371/journal.pone.0304178

[4]

Chang, S., & Smith, M. K. (2023). Residents’ quality of life in smart cities: A systematic literature review. Land, 12(4), Article 876. 10.3390/land12040876

[5]

Chen, Z., & Chan, I. C. C. (2023). Smart cities and quality of life: A quantitative analysis of citizens’ support for smart city development. Information Technology & People, 36(1), 263–285. 10.1108/itp-07-2021-0577

[6]

Ciziceno, M., & Travaglino, G. A. (2019). Perceived corruption and individuals’ life satisfaction: The mediating role of institutional trust. Social Indicators Research, 141(2), 685–701. 10.1007/s11205-018-1850-2

[7]

Cole, A., & Tran, E. (2022). Trust and the smart city: The Hong Kong paradox. China Perspectives, 2022/3, 9–20. 10.4000/chinaperspectives.14039

[8]

Egamberdiev, S. (2025). Institutional trust and subjective well-being in post-Soviet countries: The role of perceptions of corruption. Comparative Economic Studies, 1–27. 10.1057/s41294-025-00259-z

[9]

Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2016). Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 524–534. 10.1016/j.giq.2016.03.002

[10]

Glatz, C., & Eder, A. (2020). Patterns of trust and subjective well-being across Europe: New insights from repeated cross-sectional analyses based on the European social survey 2002–2016. Social Indicators Research, 148(2), 417–439. 10.1007/s11205-019-02212-x

[11]

Gracias, J. S., Parnell, G. S., Specking, E., Pohl, E. A., & Buchanan, R. (2023). Smart cities—a structured literature review. Smart Cities, 6(4), 1719–1743. 10.3390/smartcities6040080

[12]

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Knies, E. (2017). Validating a scale for citizen trust in government organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 583–601. 10.1177/0020852315585950

[13]

Gu, E., Meng, T., Wang, H., & Zhang, A. (2023). E-government use, perceived transparency, public knowledge of government performance, and satisfaction with government: An analysis of mediating, moderating, and framing mechanisms based on the COVID-19 outbreak control survey data from China. Social Indicators Research, 169(1), 79–124. 10.1007/s11205-023-03135-4

[14]

Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.

[15]

Hardi, R., Nurmandi, A., Purwaningsih, T., & Manaf, H. A. (2025). Smart city governance and interoperability: Enhancing human security in Yogyakarta and Makassar, Indonesia. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, Article 1553177. 10.3389/fpos.2025.1553177

[16]

Hartley, K. (2023). Public perceptions about smart cities: Governance and quality-of-life in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 166(3), 731–753. 10.1007/s11205-023-03087-9

[17]

Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford.

[18]

Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2018). World Happiness Report 2018. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

[19]

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

Li‐tze Hu, Peter M. Bentler

Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary... 1999 10.1080/10705519909540118

[20]

Hu, R., et al. (2023). Human-centric vs. technology-centric approaches in a top-down smart city development regime: Evidence from 341 Chinese cities. Cities, 137, Article 104271. 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104271

[21]

Kaluarachchi, Y. (2022). Implementing data-driven smart city applications for future sustainable urban development. Smart Cities, 5(2), 455–474. 10.3390/smartcities5020025

[22]

Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2012). E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 819–828. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.x

[23]

Kruhlov, V., & Dvorak, J. (2025). Social inclusivity in the smart city governance: Overcoming the digital divide. Sustainability, 17(13), Article 5735. 10.3390/su17135735

[24]

Kummitha, R. K. R. (2025). Smart city governance: Assessing modes of active citizen engagement. Regional Studies, 59(1), Article 2399262. 10.1080/00343404.2024.2399262

[25]

Lai, C. M. T., Cole, A., & Stivas, D. (2025). Understanding trust in the smart city through focus groups in Hong Kong. Urban Science, 9(4), Article 123. 10.3390/urbansci9040123

[26]

Lee, T., Lee, B. K., & Lee-Geiller, S. (2020). The effects of information literacy on trust in government websites: Evidence from an online experiment. International Journal of Information Management, 52, Article 102098. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102098

[27]

Lee-Geiller, S. (2024). The moderating effect of digital literacy on the link between e-government effectiveness and trust in government. Journal of Policy Studies, 39(4), 77–101. 10.52372/jps.e672

[28]

Li, Y., & Shang, H. (2023). How does e-government use affect citizens’ trust in government? Empirical evidence from China. Information & Management, 60(7), 103844. 10.1016/j.im.2023.103844

[29]

Luo, C., Hasan, N. A. M., & Ahmad, A. M. Z. (2024). Exploring satisfaction and trust as key drivers of e-government continuance intention: Evidence from China for sustainable digital governance. Sustainability, 16(24), Article 11068. 10.3390/su162411068

[30]

Macke, J., Sarate, J. A. R., & de Atay Moschen, S. (2019). Smart sustainable cities evaluation and sense of community. Journal of Cleaner production, 239, Article 118103. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118103

[31]

Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance

Albert Meijer, Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar

International Review of Administrative Sciences 2016 10.1177/0020852314564308

[32]

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén.

[33]

Oliveira, T. A., Oliver, M., & Ramalhinho, H. (2020). Challenges for connecting citizens and smart cities: ICT, e-governance and blockchain. Sustainability, 12(7), Article 2926. 10.3390/su12072926

[34]

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2020). Smart cities and inclusive growth. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/smart-cities-and-inclusive-growth_8a4ce475-en.html

[35]

Paquin, V., Miconi, D., Aversa, S., Johnson-Lafleur, J., Côté, S., Geoffroy, M. C., & Gülöksüz, S. (2025). Social and mental health pathways to institutional trust: A cohort study. Social Science & Medicine, 379, Article 118199. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118199

[36]

Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

Philip M. Podsakoff, Scott B. MacKenzie, Nathan P. Podsakoff

Journal of Applied Psychology 2003 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

[37]

Sharifi, A. (2019). A critical review of selected smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 1269–1283. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.172

[38]

Shi, F., & Shi, W. (2023). A critical review of smart city frameworks: New criteria to consider when building smart city framework. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(9), Article 364. 10.3390/ijgi12090364

[39]

Shin, S. Y., Kim, D., & Chun, S. A. (2021). Digital divide in advanced smart city innovations. Sustainability, 13(7), Article 4076. 10.3390/su13074076

[40]

Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS)

Alexander J.A.M. van Deursen, Ellen J. Helsper, Rebecca Eynon

Information, Communication & Society 2016 10.1080/1369118x.2015.1078834

[41]

Weigl, L., Roth, T., Amard, A., & Zavolokina, L. (2024). When public values and user-centricity in e-government collide–A systematic review. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), Article 101956. 10.1016/j.giq.2024.101956

[42]

Xin, Y., Weina, H., & Yan, D. (2025). Digital literacy impacts quality of life among older adults through hierarchical mediating mechanisms. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 19288. 10.1038/s41598-025-04472-9

[43]

Yang, X., Hu, W., & Deng, Y. (2025). Smart community governance experience and resident wellbeing: The mediating role of community participation and moderating effect of reality-expectation gap. Acta Psychologica, 259, Article 105319. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105319

[44]

Zheng, J. J. (2020). The measurement and status quo of Chinese citizens’ perceived better life: the relationship among sense of gain, sense of security and subjective being-well. Cass Journal of Political Science, 89–103.

[45]

Zheng, J., & Zhang, T. (2025). Patterns of trust and subjective well-being across societies: The role of long-term versus short-term orientation. BMC Psychology, 13(1), Article 697. 10.1186/s40359-025-03048-6

Metrics

0

Citations

45

References

Details

Published: Mar 01, 2026
Vol/Issue: 182(2)
License: View

Authors

Funding

2023 Guangxi Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Research Project Award: No.: 23CSH015

Innovation Project of Health Economic and Social Development Research Center Award: NO.:2025RWB15

Cite This Article

Yang Xin, Hu Weina, Deng Yan, et al. (2026). How Smart Governance Shapes Resident Wellbeing: The Mediating Role of Institutional Trust. Social Indicators Research, 182(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-026-03830-y

How Smart Governance Shapes Resident Wellbeing: The Mediating Role of Institutional Trust

You May Also Like