Engagement training effect of EFL learners’ willingness to communicate (WTC) and engagement in classroom activities

Shuping Zeng; Qin Chen

doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08731-w

journal article Jan 19, 2026

Engagement training effect of EFL learners’ willingness to communicate (WTC) and engagement in classroom activities

Shuping Zeng Qin Chen

Current Psychology Vol. 45 No. 3 · Springer Science and Business Media LLC

View at Publisher Save 10.1007/s12144-025-08731-w

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

79

[1]

Anani Sarab, M. R., & Jabbarzadeh Sani, B. (2024). Enhancing elementary EFL learners’ willingness to communicate through communication strategy training. English Teaching & Learning, 48(1), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-022-00133-6 10.1007/s42321-022-00133-6

[2]

Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176821 10.2307/1176821

[3]

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-7435(02)00048-8 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00048-8

[4]

Benhadj, Y. (2021). A quasi-experimental study on the impact of blendedlearning on EFL students’ language proficiency. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 3(3), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v2i3.668 10.36892/ijlls.v2i3.668

[5]

Boykin, A. W., & Noguera, P. (2011). Creating the opportunity to learn: Moving from research to practice to close the achievement gap. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://www.ascd.org/books/creating-the-opportunity-to-learn?variant=107016

[6]

Brenneman, K. (2011). Assessment for preschool science learning and learning environments. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 13(1), 1–9.

[7]

Çeliktürk, H., & Bektaş-Çetinkaya, Y. (2023). The impact of a digital game on EFL students’ willingness to communicate in English. Eurasian Journal of Language Teaching & Linguistic Studies (EAJLTLS), 3(1).

[8]

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0 10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0

[9]

Christenson, S., Reshly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7

[10]

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203029053

[11]

Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar, & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development: Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 43–77). Erlbaum.

[12]

Connell, J. P., Halpern-Felsher, B. L., Clifford, E., Crichlow, W., & Usinger, P. (1995). Hanging in there: Behavioral, psychological, and contextual factors affecting whether African American adolescents stay in school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743554895101004 10.1177/0743554895101004

[13]

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

[14]

Dariyemez, T. (2023). Teaching speaking skills through flipped classroom model: EFL students’ autonomy, willingness to communicate, and anxiety. i-Manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 13(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.13.2.19444 10.26634/jelt.13.2.19444

[15]

Davis, H. A., Summers, J. J., & Miller, L. M. (2012). An interpersonal approach to classroom management: Strategies for improving student engagement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483387383 10.4135/9781483387383

[16]

Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement

Don C. Des Jarlais, Cynthia Lyles, Nicole Crepaz

American Journal of Public Health 2004 10.2105/ajph.94.3.361

[17]

Epstein, J. L., & Mcpartland, J. M. (1976). The concept and measurement of the quality of school life. American Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/000283120130010 10.3102/000283120130010

[18]

Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. (Rep. No. NCES-93-470). National Center for Education Statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED505962. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2003/10/student-engagement-at-school_g1gh397d/9789264018938-en.pdf

[19]

Academic success among students at risk for school failure.

Jeremy D. Finn, Donald A. Rock

Journal of Applied Psychology 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.221

[20]

Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2013). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5

[21]

Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Voelkl, K. E. (1995). Disruptive and inattentive withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. Elementary School Journal, 95(5), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1086/461853 10.1086/461853

[22]

School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence

Jennifer A Fredricks, Phyllis C Blumenfeld, Alison H Paris

Review of Educational Research 10.3102/00346543074001059

[23]

Gettinger, M., & Ball, C. (2007). Best practices in increasing academic engaged time. In A. Thomas, & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1043–1075). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists. Reading Horizons.

[24]

Gettinger, M., & Walter, M. J. (2013). Classroom strategies to enhance academic engaged time. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 653–673). Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_31

[25]

Great Schools Partnership (2016). The glossary of education reform. Retrieved from edglossary.org: http://edglossary.org/student-engagement/

[26]

Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). Classroom environments and developmental processes. In J. L. Meece, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development (pp. 25–41). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874844 10.4324/9780203874844

[27]

Hancock, V., & Betts, F. (2002). Back to the future: Preparing learne rs for academic success in 2004. Learning & Leading with Technology, 29(7), 10–14.

[28]

Hancock, K. J., & Zubrick, S. R. (2015). Children and young people at risk of disengagement from school. University of Western Australia.

[29]

Han, R., Alibakhshi, G., Lu, L., & Labbafi, A. (2024). Digital communication activities and EFL learners’ willingness to communicate and engagement: Exploring the intermediate language learners’ perceptions. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25213 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25213

[30]

Henry, K. L., Knight, K. E., & Thornberry, T. P. (2012). School disengagement as a predictor of dropout, delinquency, and problem substance use during adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12(2), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9665-3 10.1007/s10964-011-9665-3

[31]

Huang, H., & Li, M. (2024). The impact of technology-enhanced language learning environments on second language learners’ willingness to communicate: A systematic review of empirical studies from 2012 to 2023. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73593 10.64152/10125/73593

[32]

Hu, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). The predicting role of EFL teachers’ immediacy behaviors in students’ willingness to communicate and academic engagement. BMC Psychology, 11(1), 318. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01378-x 10.1186/s40359-023-01378-x

[33]

Illowsky, B., & Dean, S. (2017). Introductory statisticcs. Houston, Texas: OpenStax. https://assets.openstax.org/oscms.prodcms/media/documents/IntroductoryBusinessStatistics-OP.pdf

[34]

Jacob, B., & Ludwig, J. (2009). Improving educational outcomes for poor children. In M. Cancian, & S. Danziger (Eds.), Changing poverty, changing policies (pp. 266–300). Russell Sage Foundation.

[35]

Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340893 10.1007/bf03340893

[36]

Jones, R. D. (2008). Strengthening student engagement. Retrieved January 4, 2017, from international center for leadership in education. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-11-2013-0123 10.1108/ejtd-11-2013-0123

[37]

Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287 10.5465/256287

[38]

Kohler, K. M. (2020). Investigating the acceptability and effectiveness of a mindfulness-based professional development with general and special education teacher candidates. The Pennsylvania State University. https://www.proquest.com/openview/187362ce47003319b0652caaa61992ba/1?cbl=18750&diss=y&pq-origsite=gscholar

[39]

Kontos, S., & Wilcox-Herzog, A. (1997). Teachers’ interactions with children: Why are they so important? Research in review. Young Children, 52(2), 4–12.

[40]

Kruk, M. (2022). Dynamicity of perceived willingness to communicate, motivation, boredom and anxiety in Second Life: the case of two advanced learners of English. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35 (1–2), 190–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1677722 10.1080/09588221.2019.1677722

[41]

Kuh, G. D. (2008). Diagnosing why some students don’t succeed. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(16), A72. https://brockinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Kuh.pdf

[42]

Lehr, C. A., Sinclair, M. F., & Christenson, S. L. (2004). Addressing student engagement and truancy prevention during the elementary school years: A replication study of the Check & Connect model. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 9(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327671espr0903_4 10.1207/s15327671espr0903_4

[43]

Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2011). A guide for novice researchers on experimental and quasi-experimental studies in information systems research. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management, 6, 151. https://doi.org/10.28945/1373 10.28945/1373

[44]

Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223 10.1080/10573560308223

[45]

Lumsden, L. S. (1994). Student motivation to learn. ERIC Digest. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED370200.pdf

[46]

Conceptualizing Willingness to Communicate in a L2: A Situational Model of L2 Confidence and Affiliation

Peter D. MacIntyre, Richard Clément, ZOLTÁN DÖRNYEI et al.

The Modern Language Journal 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x

[47]

Conceptualizing Willingness to Communicate in a L2: A Situational Model of L2 Confidence and Affiliation

Peter D. MacIntyre, Richard Clément, ZOLTÁN DÖRNYEI et al.

The Modern Language Journal 1998 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x

[48]

MacIntyre, P., & Vincze, L. (2017). Positive and negative emotions underlie motivation for L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.1.4 10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.1.4

[49]

Willingness to communicate in the L2 about meaningful photos: Application of the pyramid model of WTC

Peter D. MacIntyre, Lanxi Wang

Language Teaching Research 2021 10.1177/13621688211004645

[50]

Mahmoodi, M. H., & Moazam, I. (2014). Willingness to communicate (WTC) and L2 achievement: The case of Arabic language learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1069–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.518 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.518

Showing 50 of 79 references

Metrics

0

Citations

79

References

Details

Published: Jan 19, 2026
Vol/Issue: 45(3)
License: View

Authors

Cite This Article

Shuping Zeng, Qin Chen (2026). Engagement training effect of EFL learners’ willingness to communicate (WTC) and engagement in classroom activities. Current Psychology, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08731-w

Engagement training effect of EFL learners’ willingness to communicate (WTC) and engagement in classroom activities

You May Also Like