Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

Marijn Janssen; Paul Brous; Elsa Estevez; Luis S. Barbosa; Tomasz Janowski

doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493

journal article Jul 01, 2020

Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

Marijn Janssen

Paul Brous Elsa Estevez Luis S. Barbosa Tomasz Janowski

Government Information Quarterly Vol. 37 No. 3 pp. 101493 · Elsevier BV

View at Publisher Save 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

29

[1]

Executive Office of the President (2016)

[2]

Abraham "Data governance: A conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda" International Journal of Information Management (2019) 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.008

[3]

Benfeldt "Data governance as a collective action problem" Information Systems Frontiers (2020) 10.1007/s10796-019-09923-z

[4]

Beretta (2018)

[5]

Brackett (2009)

[6]

Brous (2020)

[7]

Cuganesan "Managing information sharing and stewardship for public-sector collaboration: A management control approach" Public Management Review (2017) 10.1080/14719037.2016.1238102

[8]

Dasu "Data glitches: Monsters in your data" (2013)

[9]

Dawes "Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency" Government Information Quarterly (2010) 10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.001

[10]

De Haes "COBIT 5 and enterprise governance of information technology: Building blocks and research opportunities" Journal of Information Systems (2013) 10.2308/isys-50422

[11]

Dunphy "A first look at identity management schemes on the blockchain" IEEE Security & Privacy (2018) 10.1109/msp.2018.3111247

[12]

European Commission

[13]

Hammer "Reengineering work: don’t automate, obliterate" Harvard Business Review (1990)

[14]

Janssen "The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance" Government Information Quarterly (2016) 10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.011

[15]

Janssen (2017)

[16]

Janssen "Big and open linked data (BOLD) to create smart cities and citizens: Insights from smart energy and mobility cases" (2015)

[17]

Janssen "Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government" Government Information Quarterly (2016) 10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.003

[18]

Khatri "Designing data governance" Communications of the ACM (2010) 10.1145/1629175.1629210

[19]

Koltay "Data governance, data literacy and the management of data quality" IFLA Journal (2016) 10.1177/0340035216672238

[20]

Ladley (2019)

[21]

Levi "Political trust and trustworthiness" Annual Review of Political Science (2000) 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475

[22]

Mullon "An integrated framework to elevate information governance to a national level in South Africa" Records Management Journal (2019) 10.1108/rmj-09-2018-0030

[23]

Ølnes "Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing" Government Information Quarterly (2017) 10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007

[24]

European Parliament and European Council "Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing directive 95/46" Official Journal of the European Union (2016)

[25]

Plotkin (2013)

[26]

Rothstein "Risk and the limits of governance: Exploring varied patterns of risk-based governance across Europe" Regulation & Governance (2013) 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01153.x

[27]

Strong "Data quality in context" Communications of the ACM (1997) 10.1145/253769.253804

[28]

Wihlborg ""The Computer Says No!"--A Case Study on Automated Decision-Making in Public Authorities" (2016)

[29]

Yang "Trustworthiness of public service" (2013)

Cited By

512

A Review of Construction and Demolition Waste Management: Resource Coordination and Multidimensional Interaction

Yi-Hsin Lin, Weidong Yuan · 2026

Buildings

Advancing public administration research: integrating digital governance, institutional resilience, and participatory pathways for public value

Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar · 2026

International Review of Administrat...

The Implementation Gap: A Socio-Technical Analysis of AI-Assisted Redaction Adoption in UK Public Authorities

Yijun Chen · 2026

Digital Government: Research and Pr...

Trustworthy artificial intelligence and organisational trust: a scoping review using socio-technical systems analysis

Rebecca Vining, Sajjad Karimian · 2025

Ergonomics

Artificial intelligence in knowledge management: Identifying and addressing the key implementation challenges

Mojtaba Rezaei · 2025

Technological Forecasting and Socia...

Algorithms for a new season? Mapping a decade of research on the artificial intelligence-driven digital transformation of public administration

Yanto Chandra, Naikang Feng · 2025

Public Management Review

Blockchain enabled collective and combined deep learning framework for COVID19 diagnosis

Sudhakar Periyasamy, Prabu Kaliyaperumal · 2025

Scientific Reports

Implementing artificial intelligence in academic and administrative processes through responsible strategic leadership in the higher education institutions

Suleman Ahmad Khairullah, Sheetal Harris · 2025

Frontiers in Education

Federated Learning for 6G Networks: Navigating Privacy Benefits and Challenges

Chamara Sandeepa, Engin Zeydan · 2025

IEEE Open Journal of the Communicat...

Artificial intelligence-empowered collection and characterization of microplastics: A review

Pengwei Guo, Yuhuan Wang · 2024

Journal of Hazardous Materials

AI-Driven Intelligent Data Analytics and Predictive Analysis in Industry 4.0: Transforming Knowledge, Innovation, and Efficiency

Zhijuan Zong, Yu Guan · 2024

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

Can chatbots represent? Examining the potential for symbolic representation in automated service agents

Brian Stelbotsky, Sanghee Park · 2024

Public Management Review

Navigating challenges and opportunities of machine learning in hydrogen catalysis and production processes: Beyond algorithm development

Mohd Nur Ikhmal Salehmin, Sieh Kiong Tiong · 2024

Journal of Energy Chemistry

Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices

Bo Li, Peng Qi · 2023

ACM Computing Surveys

AI adoption and diffusion in public administration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda

Rohit Madan, Mona Ashok · 2023

Government Information Quarterly

Bureaucrat or artificial intelligence: people’s preferences and perceptions of government service

Dongfang Gaozhao, James E. Wright · 2023

Public Management Review

Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and ‘the dark side’ of AI

Patrick Mikalef, Kieran Conboy · 2022

European Journal of Information Sys...

Digital government transformation in turbulent times: Responses, challenges, and future direction

Seok-Jin Eom, Jooho Lee · 2022

Government Information Quarterly

Artificial intelligence for the public sector: results of landscaping the use of AI in government across the European Union

Colin van Noordt, Gianluca Misuraca · 2022

Government Information Quarterly

Seizing the opportunity window of artificial intelligence in China: Towards an innovation policy mix framework for emerging technologies from an evolution perspective

Jing Liu, Mengbo Wang · 2022

Systems Research and Behavioral Sci...

Metrics

512

Citations

29

References

Details

Published: Jul 01, 2020
Vol/Issue: 37(3)
Pages: 101493
License: View

Authors

Cite This Article

Marijn Janssen, Paul Brous, Elsa Estevez, et al. (2020). Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493

Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

You May Also Like