Identifying patterns and recommendations of and for sustainable open data initiatives: A benchmarking-driven analysis of open government data initiatives among European countries

Martin Lnenicka; Anastasija Nikiforova; Mariusz Luterek; Petar Milic; Daniel Rudmark; Sebastian Neumaier; Caterina Santoro; Cesar Casiano Flores; Marijn Janssen; Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar

doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101898

journal article Mar 01, 2024

Identifying patterns and recommendations of and for sustainable open data initiatives: A benchmarking-driven analysis of open government data initiatives among European countries

Martin Lnenicka Anastasija Nikiforova Mariusz Luterek Petar Milic Daniel Rudmark Sebastian Neumaier Caterina Santoro Cesar Casiano Flores Marijn Janssen

Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar

Government Information Quarterly Vol. 41 No. 1 pp. 101898 · Elsevier BV

View at Publisher Save 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101898

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

47

[1]

Bannister "The curse of the benchmark: An assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons" International Review of Administrative Sciences (2007) 10.1177/0020852307077959

[2]

Breaugh "Leadership and institutional design in collaborative government digitalisation: Evidence from Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, and the UK" Government Information Quarterly (2023) 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101788

[3]

Chopard "Methods brief: Case studies" Justice Research and Statistics Association (2021)

[4]

Dawes "Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach" Government Information Quarterly (2016) 10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003

[5]

Building Theories from Case Study Research

Kathleen M. Eisenhardt

The Academy of Management Review 1989 10.2307/258557

[6]

Franklin "Idea generation and exploration: Benefits and limitations of the policy Delphi research method" Innovative Higher Education (2007) 10.1007/s10755-006-9022-8

[7]

Gharawi "Issues and strategies for conducting cross-national e-government comparative research" (2009)

[8]

González (2017)

[9]

Heeks "Benchmarking e-government: Improving the national and international measurement, evaluation and comparison of e-government" (2008)

[10]

Jacobs "A theoretical framework of organizational change" Journal of Organizational Change Management (2013) 10.1108/jocm-09-2012-0137

[11]

de Juana-Espinosa "Open government data portals in the European Union: Considerations, development, and expectations" Technological Forecasting and Social Change (2019) 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119769

[12]

Karlöf "Benchmarking" (2003)

[13]

Kassen "Open data and its institutional ecosystems: A comparative cross-jurisdictional analysis of open data platforms" Canadian Public Administration (2018) 10.1111/capa.12251

[14]

Kawashita "An assessment of open government data benchmark instruments" (2020)

[15]

Ki "Public service motivation and government officials' willingness to learn in public sector benchmarking process" Public Management Review (2021) 10.1080/14719037.2019.1708437

[16]

Kubler "Comparison of metadata quality in open data portals using the analytic hierarchy process" Government Information Quarterly (2018) 10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.003

[17]

Kuhlmann "Performance measurement and benchmarking as “reflexive institutions” for local governments: Germany, Sweden and England compared" International Journal of Public Sector Management (2018) 10.1108/ijpsm-01-2017-0004

[18]

Kuhlmann (2019)

[19]

Lijphart "Comparative politics and the comparative method" American Political Science Review (1971) 10.2307/1955513

[20]

Linstone "The Delphi technique" (1985)

[21]

Lnenicka "Benchmarking open data efforts through indices and rankings: Assessing development and contexts of use" Telematics and Informatics (2022) 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101745

[22]

Lnenicka "A theoretical framework to evaluate ICT disparities and digital divides: Challenges and implications for e-government development" Review of Economic Perspectives (2022) 10.2478/revecp-2022-0002

[23]

Machova "Reframing e-government development indices with respect to new trends in ICT" Review of Economic Perspectives (2015) 10.1515/revecp-2015-0027

[24]

Machova "Evaluating the quality of open data portals on the national level" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research (2017) 10.4067/s0718-18762017000100003

[25]

Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews

Ines Mergel, Noella Edelmann, Nathalie Haug

Government Information Quarterly 2019 10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

[26]

Meuleman "Open government data for sustainable development: Trends, policies and assessment: Continuing the pilot assessment of the open government data index (OGDI)" (2022)

[27]

Michener "Policy evaluation via composite indexes: Qualitative lessons from international transparency policy indexes" World Development (2015) 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.04.016

[28]

Mullen "Delphi: Myths and reality" Journal of Health Organization and Management (2003) 10.1108/14777260310469319

[29]

Nardo (2008)

[30]

Neumaier "Automated quality assessment of metadata across open data portals" Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ) (2016) 10.1145/2964909

[31]

Nikiforova "Open government data portal usability: A user-centred usability analysis of 41 open government data portals" Telematics and Informatics (2021) 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101539

[32]

Nikiforova "Towards High-Value Datasets determination for data-driven development: a systematic literature review" (2023)

[33]

Quarati "Geospatial open data usage and metadata quality" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (2021) 10.3390/ijgi10010030

[34]

Rose "Comparing forms of comparative analysis" Political Studies (1991) 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb01622.x

[35]

Sammut-Bonnici "Benchmarking" (2015)

[36]

Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2016). Toward an integrative assessment of open government: Proposing conceptual lenses and practical components. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1–2), 170–192. 10.1080/10919392.2015.1125190

[37]

Sayogo "Exploring the motive for data publication in open data initiative: Linking intention to action" (2012)

[38]

‘Just like I thought’: Street‐level bureaucrats trust AI recommendations if they confirm their professional judgment

Friso Selten, Marcel Robeer, Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen

Public Administration Review 2023 10.1111/puar.13602

[39]

Styrin "Open data ecosystems: An international comparison" Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy (2017) 10.1108/tg-01-2017-0006

[40]

Susha "Benchmarks for evaluating the progress of open data adoption: Usage, limitations, and lessons learned" Social Science Computer Review (2015) 10.1177/0894439314560852

[41]

Vancauwenberghe "Assessing the openness of spatial data infrastructures (SDI): Towards a map of open SDI" International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research (2018)

[42]

Veljkovic "Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective" Government Information Quarterly (2014) 10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.011

[43]

Welle Donker "How to assess the success of the open data ecosystem?" International Journal of Digital Earth (2017) 10.1080/17538947.2016.1224938

[44]

Yin (2018)

[45]

Zheng "Evaluating global open government data: Methods and status" (2020)

[46]

Zuiderwijk "Comparing open data benchmarks: Which metrics and methodologies determine countries' positions in the ranking lists?" Telematics and Informatics (2021) 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101634

[47]

Zuiderwijk "Open data disclosure and use: Critical factors from a case study" (2015)

Metrics

54

Citations

47

References

Details

Published: Mar 01, 2024
Vol/Issue: 41(1)
Pages: 101898
License: View

Authors

M

Martin Lnenicka

A

Anastasija Nikiforova

WU Vienna, Austria

Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar

University of Granada, Spain

Cite This Article

Martin Lnenicka, Anastasija Nikiforova, Mariusz Luterek, et al. (2024). Identifying patterns and recommendations of and for sustainable open data initiatives: A benchmarking-driven analysis of open government data initiatives among European countries. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101898

Identifying patterns and recommendations of and for sustainable open data initiatives: A benchmarking-driven analysis of open government data initiatives among European countries

You May Also Like