Habermas revisited: Resurrecting the contested roots of communicative planning theory

Hanna Mattila

doi:10.1016/j.progress.2019.04.001

journal article Oct 01, 2020

Habermas revisited: Resurrecting the contested roots of communicative planning theory

Hanna Mattila

Progress in Planning Vol. 141 pp. 100431 · Elsevier BV

View at Publisher Save 10.1016/j.progress.2019.04.001

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

204

[1]

Adorno (2008)

[2]

Albrechts "Communicative planning, emancipatory politics and postmodernism" (2001)

[3]

The Communicative Turn in Urban Planning: Unravelling Paradigmatic, Imperialistic and Moralistic Dimensions

Philip Allmendinger, Mark Tewdwr-Jones

Space and Polity 2002 10.1080/13562570220137871

[4]

Ambrose (1986)

[5]

Arendt (1992)

[6]

Arendt (1998)

[7]

Austin (1961)

[8]

Austin (1962)

[9]

Baynes "Democracy and the Rechtsstaat: Habermas's Faktizität und Geltung" (1995)

[10]

Baynes "Deliberative democracy and the limits of liberalism" (2002)

[11]

Benhabib (1986)

[12]

Benhabib (1992)

[13]

Benhabib "“Between Facts and Norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. By Jürgen Habermas”. Review by Seyla Benhabib" The American Political Science Review (1997) 10.2307/2952099

[14]

Blaug (1999)

[15]

Bohman "Emancipation and rhetoric: The perlocutions and illocutions of the social critic" Philosophy and Rhetoric (1988)

[16]

Bohman "Complexity, pluralism and the constitutional state: On Habermas's Faktizität und Geltung" Law & Society Review (1994) 10.2307/3054001

[17]

Bohman "Critical theory and democracy" (1996)

[18]

Bond "Negotiating a ‘democratic ethos’: moving beyond the agonistic – Communicative divide" Planning Theory (2011) 10.1177/1473095210383081

[19]

Boucher "The politics of aesthetic affect – A reconstruction of Habermas’ art theory" Parrhesia (2011)

[20]

Calhoun "Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere" (1992)

[21]

Campbell "Just planning. The art of the situated ethical judgment" Journal of Planning Education and Research (2006) 10.1177/0739456x06288090

[22]

Campbell "Ethical frameworks and planning theory" International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (1999) 10.1111/1468-2427.00208

[23]

Utilitarianism’s Bad Breath? A Re-Evaluation of the Public Interest Justification for Planning

Heather Campbell, Robert Marshall

Planning Theory 2002 10.1177/147309520200100205

[24]

Campbell "Towards justice in planning: A reappraisal" European Planning Studies (2006) 10.1080/09654310500418192

[25]

Chambers "Feminist discourse/practical discourse" (1995)

[26]

Cooke "Habermas, feminism and the question of autonomy" (1999)

[27]

Dahlberg "Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis" Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (2001) 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00137.x

[28]

Dahlberg "The Habermasian public sphere: Taking difference seriously?" Theory and Society (2005) 10.1007/s11186-005-0155-z

[29]

Dahlberg "The Internet and discursive exclusion: From deliberative to agonistic public sphere theory" (2007)

[30]

Dahlberg "The Internet, deliberative democracy, and power: Radicalizing the public sphere" International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics (2007) 10.1386/macp.3.1.47_1

[31]

The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation

Peter Dahlgren

Political Communication 2005 10.1080/10584600590933160

[32]

Davidoff "Advocacy and pluralism in planning" Journal of the American Institute of Planners (1965) 10.1080/01944366508978187

[33]

Dean "Discourse in different voices" (1995)

[34]

Deflem "Law in Habermas's theory of communicative action" Vniversitas (2008)

[35]

Deflem "The legal theory of Jürgen Habermas: between the philosophy and the sociology of law" (2013)

[36]

Duvenage (2003)

[37]

Duvenage "Habermas, the public sphere and beyond" Communicatio (2005) 10.1080/02500160508538008

[38]

Fainstein "New directions in planning theory" Urban Affairs Review (2000) 10.1177/107808740003500401

[39]

Fainstein "Planning theory and the city" Journal of Planning Education and Research (2005) 10.1177/0739456x05279275

[40]

Fainstein "Spatial justice and planning" Justice Spatiale – Spatial Justice (2009)

[41]

Fainstein (2010)

[42]

The just city

Susan S. Fainstein

International Journal of Urban Sciences 2014 10.1080/12265934.2013.834643

[43]

Fischer (1990)

[44]

(1993)

[45]

Fischler "Communicative planning theory: A Foucauldian assessment" Journal of Planning Education and Research (2000) 10.1177/0739456x0001900405

[46]

Flyvbjerg (1998)

[47]

Flyvbjerg "Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for civil society?" The British Journal of Sociology (1998) 10.2307/591310

[48]

Flyvbjerg "Planning and Foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory" (2002)

[49]

Forbath "Short-circuit. A critique of Habermas's understanding of law, politics and economic life" (1998)

[50]

Forester "Planning in the face of power" Journal of the American Planning Association (1982) 10.1080/01944368208976167

Showing 50 of 204 references

Cited By

36

Public interest or elite consensus? Contextualizing the construction of public interest in Tehran's urban planning system

Hashem Dadashpoor, Ailin Sheydayi · 2026

Cities

Defining Public Interest in Planning: A Review

Hashem Dadashpoor, Ailin Sheydayi · 2021

Journal of Planning Literature

Metrics

36

Citations

204

References

Details

Published: Oct 01, 2020
Vol/Issue: 141
Pages: 100431
License: View

Authors

H

Hanna Mattila

Department of Built Environment, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; Department of Architecture, Design, and Media Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

Funding

Academy of Finland Award: 288848

Cite This Article

Hanna Mattila (2020). Habermas revisited: Resurrecting the contested roots of communicative planning theory. Progress in Planning, 141, 100431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2019.04.001

Habermas revisited: Resurrecting the contested roots of communicative planning theory

You May Also Like