journal article Apr 01, 2012

Interactive ontology revision

View at Publisher Save 10.1016/j.websem.2011.12.002
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
21
[1]
Nikitina "Reasoning-supported interactive revision of knowledge bases" (2011)
[2]
Nikitina "Wheat and chaff practically feasible interactive ontology revision" (2011)
[3]
On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions

Carlos E. Alchourrón, Peter Gärdenfors, David Makinson

The Journal of Symbolic Logic 1985 10.2307/2274239
[4]
M. Dalal, Investigations into a theory of knowledge base revision: preliminary report, in: Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-88), 1988, pp. 475–479.
[5]
Satoh "Nonmonotonic reasoning by minimal belief revision" (1988)
[6]
Schlobach "Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies" (2003)
[7]
Qi "A survey of revision approaches in description logics" (2008)
[8]
B. Motik, P.F. Patel-Schneider, B. Parsia, OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax, W3C Recommendation, 2009, Available at <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/>.
[9]
R. Shearer, I. Horrocks, Exploiting partial information in taxonomy construction, in: 8th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2009), vol. 5823, 2009, pp. 569–584. 10.1007/978-3-642-04930-9_36
[10]
OWL 2 Direct Semantics, OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Direct Semantics, W3C Recommendation, 2009, Available at <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-direct-semantics/>.
[11]
B. Cuenca Grau, B. Motik, Z. Wu, A. Fokoue, C. Lutz, OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Profiles, W3C Recommendation, 2009, Available at <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/>.
[12]
Kazakov "RIQ and SROIQ are harder than SHOIQ" (2008)
[13]
B. Konev, C. Lutz, D. Ponomaryov, F. Wolter, Decomposing description logic ontologies, in: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’10), 2010, pp. 236–246.
[14]
W. OWL Working Group, OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Document Overview, W3C Recommendation, 2009, Available at <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/>.
[15]
Nikitina "Semi-automatic revision of formalized knowledge" (2010)
[16]
Meilicke "Supporting manual mapping revision using logical reasoning" (2008)
[17]
Jiménez-Ruiz "Ontology integration using mappings: towards getting the right logical consequences" (2009)
[18]
Jiménez-Ruiz "Building ontologies collaboratively using ContentCVS" (2009)
[19]
Ganter (1997)
[20]
Rudolph "Exploring relational structures via FLE" (2004)
[21]
F. Baader, B. Ganter, B. Sertkaya, U. Sattler, Completing description logic knowledge bases using formal concept analysis, in: Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2007), 2007, pp. 230–235.
Metrics
25
Citations
21
References
Details
Published
Apr 01, 2012
Vol/Issue
12-13
Pages
118-130
License
View
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Cite This Article
Nadeschda Nikitina, Sebastian Rudolph, Birte Glimm (2012). Interactive ontology revision. Journal of Web Semantics, 12-13, 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2011.12.002
Related

You May Also Like

Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner

Evren Sirin, Bijan Parsia · 2007

1,699 citations

Scaling up knowledge graph creation to large and heterogeneous data sources

Enrique Iglesias, Samaneh Jozashoori · 2023

23 citations

Decentralized Collaborative Knowledge Management Using Git

Natanael Arndt, Patrick Naumann · 2019

19 citations