Explaining the Chile–Uruguay Divergence in Democratic Inclusion: Left Parties and the Political Articulation Hypothesis

Gabriel Chouhy

doi:10.1017/ssh.2021.50

journal article Open Access Jan 01, 2022

Explaining the Chile–Uruguay Divergence in Democratic Inclusion: Left Parties and the Political Articulation Hypothesis

Gabriel Chouhy

Social Science History Vol. 46 No. 2 pp. 401-430 · JSTOR

View at Publisher Save 10.1017/ssh.2021.50

Abstract

AbstractThis article develops a political articulation-based explanation of divergence in democratic inclusion between two champions of liberal democracy in Latin America: Chile and Uruguay. Political articulation scholars depart from the traditional reflection models of political parties as mere expression of preexisting social cleavages, highlighting the relative autonomy of parties’ practices and their strategic role in structuring state-society relations. My work extends this current trend in comparative-historical sociology to the Latin American Left turn after the demise of the market-fundamentalist Washington Consensus, empirically identifying a set of strategies that boost Left parties’ capacity to articulate on a specifically class basis. These strategies, I argue, are endowed with causal efficacy, driving democratic variation beyond the restrictions and opportunities of the institutional environment. Combining process tracing account of historical sequences with my own analyses of labor statistics, protest events, and party linkages and manifestos, I show that differences in Left parties’ ability to build linkages with labor and advance its institutional representation as a class actor are at the root of the divergence in political inclusion between these two countries. This finding has substantial implications for contemporary democratic theory: after neoliberalism, strongly organized mass parties of the Left may not be a necessary condition for a given democracy’s stability and consolidation, but they may be a sufficient condition for a particular democracy’s realization of the normative ideal of political equality.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

79

[1]

Lanzaro (2011)

[2]

Della Porta (2017)

[3]

Ziblatt (2017) 10.1017/9781139030335

[4]

de Leon (2015)

[5]

RedLat (2017) “La Construcción del Trabajo Decente en América Latina.” Red Latinoamericana de Investigaciones sobre Compañías Multinacionales (ed.) - 2016. São Paulo.

[6]

Castañeda, J. G. (2006) “Latin America’s left turn.” Foreign Affairs (85): 28–43. 10.2307/20031965

[7]

Oxhorn, P. (1994) “Where did all the protesters go? Popular mobilization and the transition to democracy in Chile.” Latin American Perspectives (21): 49–68. 10.1177/0094582x9402100304

[8]

10.3998/mpub.2556282

[9]

Álvarez-Rivadulla, M. J. (2012) “Clientelism or something else? Squatter politics in Montevideo.” Latin American Politics and Society: 37–63. 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2012.00142.x

[10]

Riley, D. , and Fernández, J. J. (2014) “Beyond strong and weak: Rethinking postdictatorship civil societies.” American Journal of Sociology (120): 432–503. 10.1086/678272

[11]

Bejarano (2011)

[12]

10.1017/cbo9781139343299

[13]

Mahoney (2010) 10.1017/cbo9780511750328

[14]

Etchemendy "Uruguay and contemporary theories of wage coordination: Origins and stabilization of segmented neocorporatism, 2005–2019" Latin American Politics and Society (2021) 10.1017/lap.2021.5

[15]

Markarian (2016) 10.1525/california/9780520290006.001.0001

[16]

Moore (1993)

[17]

Durán, Gonzalo , and Kremerman, Marco (2015) “Sindicatos y negociación colectiva. Panorama estadístico nacional y evidencia comparada.” Documento de trabajo área Sindicatos y Negociación Colectiva. Fundación SOL.

[18]

Amarante, V. , and Vigorito, A. (2012) Investigación y Políticas sociales: La Colaboración Entre la Udelar y el Mides Para la Implementación del PANES. Montevideo, Uruguay: Universidad de la República.

[19]

Luna, J. P. , and Filgueira, F. (2009) “The left turns as multiple paradigmatic Crises.” Third World Quarterly (30): 371–95. 10.1080/01436590802681108

[20]

Fishman (2019) 10.1093/oso/9780190912871.001.0001

[21]

Riley (2010) 10.1353/book.458

[22]

Traverso, D. B. , Moreno, E. A. , and Drouillas, O. (2012) “Removed from the bargaining table: The CUT during the Bachelet administration.” Latin American Perspectives (39): 85–101. 10.1177/0094582x12441525

[23]

Korpi (2018) 10.4324/9780429441714

[24]

Scully (1992)

[25]

10.1353/jod.0.0180

[26]

Mudge (2018)

[27]

Demasi (2009)

[28]

Markoff "Really existing democracy: Learning from Latin America in the late 1990s." New Left Review (1997)

[29]

Markoff, J. (2011) “A moving target: Democracy.” European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie (52): 239–76. 10.1017/s0003975611000105

[30]

Romero, M. J. (2009) “Plebiscitos y reglas de juego en la transición a la democracia: Chile y Uruguay.” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política (18): 117–36.

[31]

Yaffé (2005)

[32]

Esping-Andersen (1990)

[33]

Bidegain (2017) 10.1057/978-1-137-59955-1_6

[34]

Altman (2010) 10.1017/cbo9780511933950

[35]

Eidlin (2018) 10.1017/9781316227183

[36]

Schneider (2012) 10.1017/cbo9781139004244

[37]

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199642649.001.0001

[38]

Political Articulation: Parties and the Constitution of Cleavages in the United States, India, and Turkey

Cedric De Leon, Manali Desai, Cihan Tuğal

Sociological Theory 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01345.x

[39]

10.1093/oso/9780190870041.001.0001

[40]

Lehmann, P. , Matthieß, T. , Merz, N. , Regel, S. , and Werner, A. (2016) “The manifesto data collection: South America. Manifesto Project,” in W. B. f. S. (WZB) (ed.). Manifesto Project.

[41]

Skocpol, T. , and Somers, M. (1980) “The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History (22): 174–97. 10.1017/s0010417500009282

[42]

Somma (2017) 10.1057/978-1-137-59955-1_2

[43]

Levitsky (2011) 10.1353/book.1866

[44]

Esping-Andersen (2017)

[45]

Handlin (2011)

[46]

Valenzuela (1992)

[47]

10.1177/0003122416643758

[48]

Silva (2009) 10.1017/cbo9780511803222

[49]

Kitschelt (2013)

[50]

Joignant (1999)

Showing 50 of 79 references

Metrics

2

Citations

79

References

Details

Published: Jan 01, 2022
Vol/Issue: 46(2)
Pages: 401-430
License: View

Authors

G

Gabriel Chouhy

Cite This Article

Gabriel Chouhy (2022). Explaining the Chile–Uruguay Divergence in Democratic Inclusion: Left Parties and the Political Articulation Hypothesis. Social Science History, 46(2), 401-430. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2021.50

Explaining the Chile–Uruguay Divergence in Democratic Inclusion: Left Parties and the Political Articulation Hypothesis

You May Also Like