Statistical Potential for Modeling and Ranking of Protein–Ligand Interactions

Hao Fan; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; John J. Irwin; Guangqiang Dong; Brian K. Shoichet; Andrej Šali

doi:10.1021/ci200377u

journal article Nov 21, 2011

Statistical Potential for Modeling and Ranking of Protein–Ligand Interactions

Hao Fan

Dina Schneidman-Duhovny

John J. Irwin

Guangqiang Dong Brian K. Shoichet Andrej Šali

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling Vol. 51 No. 12 pp. 3078-3092 · American Chemical Society (ACS)

View at Publisher Save 10.1021/ci200377u

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

128

[1]

Brooijmans N. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. (2003) 10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.142532

[2]

Leach A. R. J. Med. Chem. (2006) 10.1021/jm060999m

[3]

Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations

Gerhard Klebe

Drug Discovery Today 2006 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.05.012

[4]

Calculation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities

Michael K. Gilson, Huan-Xiang Zhou

Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Struc... 2007 10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.040306.132550

[5]

Jain A. N. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. (2006) 10.2174/138920306778559395

[6]

de Azevedo W. F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. (2008) 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.08.014

[7]

Dominy B. N. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. (2008) 10.2174/138920108783955155

[8]

Rester U. QSAR Comb. Sci. (2006) 10.1002/qsar.200510183

[9]

Coupez B. Curr. Med. Chem. (2006) 10.2174/092986706778521797

[10]

Assessing Scoring Functions for Protein−Ligand Interactions

Philippe Ferrara, Holger Gohlke, Daniel J. Price et al.

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2004 10.1021/jm030489h

[11]

Wang R. X. J. Med. Chem. (2003) 10.1021/jm0203783

[12]

Gohlke H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. (2002) 10.1002/1521-3773(20020802)41:15<2644::aid-anie2644>3.0.co;2-o

[13]

Lead discovery using molecular docking

Brian K Shoichet, Susan L McGovern, Binqing Wei et al.

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2002 10.1016/s1367-5931(02)00339-3

[14]

A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules

Wendy D. Cornell, Piotr Cieplak, Christopher I. Bayly et al.

Journal of the American Chemical Society 1995 10.1021/ja00124a002

[15]

Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids

William L. Jorgensen, David S. Maxwell, Julian Tirado-Rives

Journal of the American Chemical Society 1996 10.1021/ja9621760

[16]

Parametrization of aliphatic CHn united atoms of GROMOS96 force field

Xavier Daura, Alan E. Mark, Wilfred F. van Gunsteren

Journal of Computational Chemistry 1998 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(19980415)19:5<535::aid-jcc6>3.0.co;2-n

[17]

Glide: A New Approach for Rapid, Accurate Docking and Scoring. 1. Method and Assessment of Docking Accuracy

Richard A. Friesner, Jay L. Banks, Robert B. Murphy et al.

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2004 10.1021/jm0306430

[18]

Merck molecular force field. V. Extension of MMFF94 using experimental data, additional computational data, and empirical rules

Thomas A. Halgren

Journal of Computational Chemistry 1996 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(199604)17:5/6<616::aid-jcc5>3.0.co;2-x

[19]

Meng E. C. J. Comput. Chem. (1992) 10.1002/jcc.540130412

[20]

Zou X. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1999) 10.1021/ja984102p

[21]

Nevins N. J. Comput. Chem. (1996)

[22]

Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field

Matthew Clark, Richard D. Cramer, Nicole Van Opdenbosch

Journal of Computational Chemistry 1989 10.1002/jcc.540100804

[23]

A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: The GROMOS force‐field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6

Chris Oostenbrink, Alessandra Villa, Alan E. Mark et al.

Journal of Computational Chemistry 2004 10.1002/jcc.20090

[24]

Ligand solvation in molecular docking

Brian K. Shoichet, Andrew R. Leach, Irwin D. Kuntz

Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 1999 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19990101)34:1<4::aid-prot2>3.0.co;2-6

[25]

Mysinger M. M. J. Chem. Inf. Model. (2010) 10.1021/ci100214a

[26]

Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function

Garrett M. Morris, David S. Goodsell, Robert S. Halliday et al.

Journal of Computational Chemistry 1998 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(19981115)19:14<1639::aid-jcc10>3.0.co;2-b

[27]

Muegge I. J. Med. Chem. (1999) 10.1021/jm980536j

[28]

Mitchell J. B. O. J. Comput. Chem. (1999) 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(199908)20:11<1177::aid-jcc8>3.0.co;2-0

[29]

Mitchell J. B. O. J. Comput. Chem. (1999) 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(199908)20:11<1165::aid-jcc7>3.0.co;2-a

[30]

Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions

Holger Gohlke, Manfred Hendlich, Gerhard Klebe

Journal of Molecular Biology 2000 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3371

[31]

Gehlhaar D. K. Chem. Biol. (1995) 10.1016/1074-5521(95)90050-0

[32]

Stahl M. J. Med. Chem. (2001) 10.1021/jm0003992

[33]

Ishchenko A. V. J. Med. Chem. (2002) 10.1021/jm0105833

[34]

Ozrin V. D. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. (2004) 10.1023/b:jcam.0000046819.20241.16

[35]

Velec H. F. G. J. Med. Chem. (2005) 10.1021/jm050436v

[36]

Kirtay C. K. QSAR Comb. Sci. (2005) 10.1002/qsar.200430926

[37]

Catana C. J. Chem. Inf. Model. (2007) 10.1021/ci600357t

[38]

Huang S. Y. J. Comput. Chem. (2006) 10.1002/jcc.20504

[39]

Huang S. Y. J. Comput. Chem. (2006) 10.1002/jcc.20505

[40]

Huang S. Y. J. Chem. Inf. Model. (2010) 10.1021/ci9002987

[41]

Murray C. W. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. (1998) 10.1023/a:1008040323669

[42]

Eldridge M. D. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. (1997) 10.1023/a:1007996124545

[43]

Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function

Garrett M. Morris, David S. Goodsell, Robert S. Halliday et al.

Journal of Computational Chemistry 1998 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(19981115)19:14<1639::aid-jcc10>3.0.co;2-b

[44]

Wang S. M. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. (2002) 10.1023/a:1016357811882

[45]

Hu X. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. (2004) 10.1016/j.jmgm.2003.11.002

[46]

Krammer A. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. (2005) 10.1016/j.jmgm.2004.11.007

[47]

Antes I. J. Chem. Inf. Model. (2005) 10.1021/ci050036g

[48]

Springer C. J. Med. Chem. (2005) 10.1021/jm0493360

[49]

Linusson A. J. Chem. Inf. Model. (2006) 10.1021/ci050323k

[50]

Klebe G. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. (2008) 10.1002/prot.22058

Showing 50 of 128 references

Cited By

70

Normalized Protein–Ligand Distance Likelihood Score for End-to-End Blind Docking and Virtual Screening

Song Xia, Yaowen Gu · 2025

Journal of Chemical Information and...

Archiving and disseminating integrative structure models

Brinda Vallat, Benjamin Webb · 2019

Journal of Biomolecular NMR

Molecular Docking: Challenges, Advances and its Use in Drug Discovery Perspective

Surovi Saikia, Manobjyoti Bordoloi · 2019

Current Drug Targets

Aromatic interactions at the ligand–protein interface: Implications for the development of docking scoring functions

Michal Brylinski · 2017

Chemical Biology & Drug Design

Beware of docking!

Yu-Chian Chen · 2015

Trends in Pharmacological Sciences

Optimized atomic statistical potentials: assessment of protein interfaces and loops

Guang Qiang Dong, Hao Fan · 2013

Bioinformatics

Metrics

70

Citations

128

References

Details

Published: Nov 21, 2011
Vol/Issue: 51(12)
Pages: 3078-3092

Authors

H

Hao Fan

Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco; Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco

D

Dina Schneidman-Duhovny

Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco

J

John J. Irwin

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco

G

Guangqiang Dong

Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco

B

Brian K. Shoichet

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco

A

Andrej Šali

Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, San Francisco

Cite This Article

Hao Fan, Dina Schneidman-Duhovny, John J. Irwin, et al. (2011). Statistical Potential for Modeling and Ranking of Protein–Ligand Interactions. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 51(12), 3078-3092. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200377u

Statistical Potential for Modeling and Ranking of Protein–Ligand Interactions

You May Also Like