journal article Open Access Jun 01, 2020

Twenty‐First Century Drought Projections in the CMIP6 Forcing Scenarios

View at Publisher Save 10.1029/2019ef001461
Abstract
AbstractThere is strong evidence that climate change will increase drought risk and severity, but these conclusions depend on the regions, seasons, and drought metrics being considered. We analyze changes in drought across the hydrologic cycle (precipitation, soil moisture, and runoff) in projections from Phase Six of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The multimodel ensemble shows robust drying in the mean state across many regions and metrics by the end of the 21st century, even following the more aggressive mitigation pathways (SSP1‐2.6 and SSP2‐4.5). Regional hotspots with strong drying include western North America, Central America, Europe and the Mediterranean, the Amazon, southern Africa, China, Southeast Asia, and Australia. Compared to SSP3‐7.0 and SSP5‐8.5, however, the severity of drying in the lower warming scenarios is substantially reduced and further precipitation declines in many regions are avoided. Along with drying in the mean state, the risk of the historically most extreme drought events also increases with warming, by 200–300% in some regions. Soil moisture and runoff drying in CMIP6 is more robust, spatially extensive, and severe than precipitation, indicating an important role for other temperature‐sensitive drought processes, including evapotranspiration and snow. Given the similarity in drought responses between CMIP5 and CMIP6, we speculate that both generations of models are subject to similar uncertainties, including vegetation processes, model representations of precipitation, and the degree to which model responses to warming are consistent with observations. These topics should be further explored to evaluate whether CMIP6 models offer reasons to have increased confidence in drought projections.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
95
[8]
Boucher O. Denvil S. Caubel A. &Foujols M. A.(2018).IPSL IPSL‐CM6A‐LR model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP.https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1534
[14]
Climate Change and Drought: From Past to Future

Benjamin I. Cook, Justin S. Mankin, Kevin J. Anchukaitis

Current Climate Change Reports 10.1007/s40641-018-0093-2
[16]
Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models

Aiguo Dai

Nature Climate Change 10.1038/nclimate1633
[18]
Danabasoglu G.(2019).NCAR CESM2 model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical.https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.7627
[19]
Danabasoglu G.(2019).NCAR CESM2‐WACCM model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP amip.https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.10041
[22]
Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization

Veronika Eyring, Sandrine Bony, Gerald A. Meehl et al.

Geoscientific Model Development 10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
[24]
Good P. Sellar A. Tang Y. Rumbold S. Ellis R. Kelley D. &Kuhlbrodt T.(2019).MOHC UKESM1.0‐LL model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP ssp245.https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6339
[31]
Guo H. John J. G. Blanton C. McHugh C. Nikonov S. Radhakrishnan A. Rand K. Zadeh N. T. Balaji V. Durachta J. Dupuis C. Menzel R. Robinson T. Underwood S. Vahlenkamp H. Bushuk M. Dunne K. A. Dussin R. Gauthier P. PG. Ginoux P. Griffies S. M. Hallberg R. Harrison M. Hurlin W. Malyshev S. Naik V. Paulot F. Paynter D. J. Ploshay J. Reichl B. G. Schwarzkopf D. M. Seman C. J. Shao A. Silvers L. Wyman B. Yan X. Zeng Y. Adcroft A. Dunne J.P. Held I. M. Krasting J. P. Horowitz L. W. Milly P. C. D. Shevliakova E. Winton M. Zhao M. &Zhang R.(2018).NOAA‐GFDL GFDL‐CM4 model output.https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1402
[36]
On the Increased Frequency of Mediterranean Drought

Martin Hoerling, Jon Eischeid, Judith Perlwitz et al.

Journal of Climate 10.1175/jcli-d-11-00296.1
[39]
IPCC (2013)
[44]
Krasting J. P. John J. G. Blanton C. McHugh C. Nikonov S. Radhakrishnan A. Krasting J. P. John J. G. Blanton C. McHugh C. Nikonov S. Radhakrishnan A. Rand K. Zadeh N. T. Balaji V. Durachta J. Dupuis C. Menzel R. Robinson T. Underwood S. Vahlenkamp H. Dunne K. A. Gauthier P. P. G. Ginoux P. Griffies S. M. Hallberg R. Harrison M. Hurlin W. Malyshev S. Naik V. Paulot F. Paynter D. J. Ploshay J. Schwarzkopf D. M. Seman C. J. Silvers L. Wyman B. Zeng Y. Adcroft A. Dunne J. P. Guo H. Held I. M. Horowitz L. W. Milly P. C. D. Shevliakova E. Stock C. Winton M. &Zhao M.(2018).NOAA‐GFDL GFDL‐ESM4 model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical.https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.8597

Showing 50 of 95 references

Cited By
796
Water Resources Research
Hydroclimate volatility on a warming Earth

Daniel L. Swain, Andreas F. Prein · 2025

Nature Reviews Earth & Environm...
Warming accelerates global drought severity

Solomon H. Gebrechorkos, Justin Sheffield · 2025

Nature
Global Change Biology
Nature Geoscience
Journal of Mountain Science
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Wetting and drying trends under climate change

Benjamin F. Zaitchik, Matthew Rodell · 2023

Nature Water
Nature Sustainability
Trends in Plant Science
Related

You May Also Like

A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions

Prajal Pradhan, Luís Costa · 2017

1,348 citations

Observed Impacts of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Wildfire in California

A. Park Williams, John T. Abatzoglou · 2019

895 citations

Global projections of river flood risk in a warmer world

Lorenzo Alfieri, Berny Bisselink · 2017

703 citations

Assessment to China's Recent Emission Pattern Shifts

Yuru Guan, Yuli Shan · 2021

573 citations