journal article May 01, 1992

Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement

View at Publisher Save 10.1029/91wr03087
Abstract
Cross borehole electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) was used to image the resistivity distribution before and during two infiltration experiments. In both cases water was introduced into the vadose zone, and the change in resistivity associated with the plume of wetted soil was imaged as a function of time. The primary purpose of this work was to study the capabilities and limitations of ERT to image underground structure and ground water movement in the vadose zone. A secondary goal was to learn specifics of unsaturated flow in a complex geologic setting. Tomographs of electrical resistivity taken before infiltration image coarser, well‐drained soils (sands and gravels) as more resistive zones, whereas finer grained soils (silts and clays), which hold more water by capillarity, are imaged as more conductive. Images of changes in resistivity during infiltration show growth of the water infiltration plume with time that is consistent with known geology. In the ERT images we see the effects of capillary barriers and infer differences between capillary‐driven flow through fine sediments and gravity‐driven flow through very permeable sediments. Images are consistent with numerical flow simulations using hydrological parameter values consistent with soil types inferred from well logs. ERT can be a useful tool to monitor movement of circuitous moisture fronts in a heterogeneous field setting that would go undetected by borehole measurements.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
37
[1]
Archie G. E. "The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics" Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng. (1942)
[2]
Bard Y. (1974)
[4]
Bishop D. J. D. W.Rice L. L.Rogers C. P.Webster‐Scholten Comparison of field‐based distribution coefficients (KdS) and retardation factors (Rs) to laboratory and other determinations of KdsRep. UCRL‐AR‐105002Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab. Livermore Calif. 1990.
[6]
Carpenter D. W. Assessment of contamination in soils and ground water at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory site Sandia National Laboratories Livermore and adjacent propertiesRep. UCAR‐10160Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab. Livermore Calif. 1984.
[10]
Dresen M. D. F.Hoffman Volatile organic compounds found in water west of LLNLRep. UCRL‐53740Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab. Livermore Calif. 1986.
[13]
Hearst J. R. (1985)
[16]
Huebner K. H. (1982)
[18]
Keller G. V. (1966)
[20]
LaBrecque D. J. Cross‐borehole resistivity modeling and model fitting Ph.D. thesis Univ. of Utah Salt Lake City 1989.
[24]
Sasaki Y. Model studies of resistivity tomography using boreholesSociety of Exploration Geophysicists International Symposium on Borehole Geophysics: Petroleum Hydrogeology Mining and Engineering ApplicationsSoc. of Explor. Geophys.Tucson Ariz.Feb. 1990.
[25]
Scalmanini J. C. V. H.Scott Design and operational criteria for artificial groundwater recharge facilities Water Sci. Eng. Pap. 2009 Dep. of Land Air and Water Resour. Univ. of Calif. Davis 1979.
[26]
Schlumberger C. (1920)
[27]
Stone R. M. R.Ruggieri Ground‐water quality and movement at Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryRep. UCRL‐53474Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab. Livermore Calif. 1983.
[28]
Stone R. M. R.Ruggieri L. L.Rogers D. O.Emerson R. W.Buddemeir Potential for saturated ground‐water system contamination at the Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryRep. UCRL‐53426Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab. Livermore Calif. 1982.
[29]
Toney K. C. A hydrogeological investigation of ground water recharge near the drainage retention basin Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore California thesis Dep. of Geol. San Jose State Univ. San Jose Calif. Aug.1990.
[30]
Two-dimensional resistivity inversion

A. C. Tripp, G. W. Hohmann, C. M. Swift

Geophysics 10.1190/1.1441578
[31]
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1991)
[32]
A Closed‐form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils

M. Th. van Genuchten

Soil Science Society of America Journal 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
[33]
Wannamaker P. E. J. A.Stodt L.Rijo PW2D finite element program for solution of magnetotelluric responses of two‐dimensional Earth resistivity structureRep. ESL‐158 40Earth Sci. Lab. Univ. of Utah Res. Inst. Salt Lake City 1987.
[34]
Weiss Associates Ground water investigation at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CaliforniaRep. UCRL‐15835Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab. Livermore Calif. 1985.
[36]
Yorkey T. J. Comparing reconstruction methods for electrical resistance tomography Ph.D. thesis Univ. of Wisconsin Madison 1986.
Metrics
433
Citations
37
References
Details
Published
May 01, 1992
Vol/Issue
28(5)
Pages
1429-1442
License
View
Cite This Article
William Daily, Abelardo Ramirez, Douglas LaBrecque, et al. (1992). Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement. Water Resources Research, 28(5), 1429-1442. https://doi.org/10.1029/91wr03087