Abstract
To obtain bulk surface flux estimates approaching the ±10 W m−2 accuracy desired for the Tropical Ocean‐Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean‐Atmosphere Response Experiment (COARE) program, bulk water temperature data from ships and buoys must be corrected for cool‐skin and diurnal warm‐layer effects. In this paper we describe two simple scaling models to estimate these corrections. The cool‐skin model is based on the standard Saunders [1967] treatment, including the effects of solar radiation absorption, modified to include both shear‐driven and convectively driven turbulence through their relative contributions to the near‐surface turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate. Shear and convective effects are comparable at a wind speed of about 2.5 m s−1. For the R/V Moana Wave COARE data collected in the tropical western Pacific, the model gives an average cool skin of 0.30 K at night and an average local noon value of 0.18 K. The warm‐layer model is based on a single‐layer scaling version of a model by Price et al. [1986]. In this model, once solar heating of the ocean exceeds the combined cooling by turbulent scalar heat transfer and net longwave radiation, then the main body of the mixed layer is cut off from its source of turbulence. Thereafter, surface inputs of heat and momentum are confined to a depth DT that is determined by the subsequent integrals of the heat and momentum. The model assumes linear profiles of temperature‐induced and surface‐stress‐induced current in this “warm layer.” The model is shown to describe the peak afternoon warming and diurnal cycle of the warming quite accurately, on average, with a choice of a critical Richardson number of 0.65. For a clear day with a 10‐m wind speed of 1 m s−1, the peak afternoon warming is about 3.8 K with a warm‐layer depth of 0.7 m, decreasing to about 0.2 K and 19 m at a wind speed of 7 m s−1. For an average over 70 days sampled during COARE, the cool skin increases the average atmospheric heat input to the ocean by about 11 W m−2; the warm layer decreases it by about 4 W m−2 (but the effect can be 50 W m−2 at midday).
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
23
[1]
Carslaw H. A. (1971)
[2]
Coppin P. A. Measurements of sea surface temperature aboard R/V Franklin during TOGA COARETOGA COARE Data WorkshopCent. Natl. d'Etudes SpatialeToulouse France 1994.
[6]
Fairall C. W. "Integrated shipboard measurements of the marine boundary layer" J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. (1996)
[7]
Fedorov K. N. (1992)
[9]
Lukas R. Observations of air‐sea interaction in the western Pacific warm pool during WEPOCSWestern Pacific International Meeting and Workshop for TOGA COAREInst. Fr. de Rech. Sci. pour le Dev. en Coop. (ORSTOM)Noumea New Caledonia 1989.
[10]
Panofsky H. A. (1984)
[13]
Ravier‐Hay P. J. S.Godfrey A model of diurnal changes in sea surface temperature for the western equatorial Pacific TOGA Notes 11 5–8 Nova Southeast. Univ. Dania Fla. 1993.
[17]
Shigayeva V. V. "Study of temperature surface film by results of sea observations" Meteorol. Gidrol. (1982)
[18]
Soloviev A. V. "On the vertical structure of the ocean thin surface layer at light wind" Dokl. Acad. Sci. USSR, Earth Sci. Ser. (1982)
Cited By
658
Journal of Geophysical Research: At...
Atmosphere‐ocean coupled processes in the Madden‐Julian oscillation

Charlotte A. DeMott, Nicholas P. Klingaman · 2015

Reviews of Geophysics
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oc...
Continental Shelf Research
Metrics
658
Citations
23
References
Details
Published
Jan 15, 1996
Vol/Issue
101(C1)
Pages
1295-1308
License
View
Cite This Article
C. W. Fairall, E. F. Bradley, J. S. Godfrey, et al. (1996). Cool‐skin and warm‐layer effects on sea surface temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 101(C1), 1295-1308. https://doi.org/10.1029/95jc03190