journal article May 01, 2018

Putting the art in artificial: Aesthetic responses to computer-generated art.

Rebecca Chamberlain

Caitlin Mullin Bram Scheerlinck Johan Wagemans

Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts Vol. 12 No. 2 pp. 177-192 · American Psychological Association (APA)

View at Publisher Save 10.1037/aca0000136

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

Cited By

165

Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst for Change in Higher Education Art Study Programs

Anna Ansone, Zinta Zālīte-Supe · 2025

Computers

AI: An Active and Innovative Tool for Artistic Creation

Charis Avlonitou, Eirini Papadaki · 2025

Arts

Reflecting on cultural labour in the time of AI

Hye-Kyung Lee · 2024

Media, Culture & Society

Humans versus AI: whether and why we prefer human-created compared to AI-created artwork

Lucas Bellaiche, Rohin Shahi · 2023

Cognitive Research: Principles and...

Does human–AI collaboration lead to more creative art? Aesthetic evaluation of human-made and AI-generated haiku poetry

Jimpei Hitsuwari, Yoshiyuki Ueda · 2023

Computers in Human Behavior

Investigating the negative bias towards artificial intelligence: Effects of prior assignment of AI-authorship on the aesthetic appreciation of abstract paintings

Salvatore G. Chiarella, Giulia Torromino · 2022

Computers in Human Behavior

Understanding and Creating Art with AI: Review and Outlook

Eva Cetinic, James She · 2022

ACM Transactions on Multimedia Comp...

Using an AI creativity system to explore how aesthetic experiences are processed along the brain’s perceptual neural pathways

Vanessa Utz, Steve DiPaola · 2020

Cognitive Systems Research

Metrics

165

Citations

0

References

Details

Published: May 01, 2018
Vol/Issue: 12(2)
Pages: 177-192

Authors

Rebecca Chamberlain

Bram Scheerlinck

Cite This Article

Rebecca Chamberlain, Caitlin Mullin, Bram Scheerlinck, et al. (2018). Putting the art in artificial: Aesthetic responses to computer-generated art.. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(2), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000136

Related

You May Also Like

Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods.

Paul J. Silvia, Beate P. Winterstein · 2008

593 citations

Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis.

Michelle M. Hammond, Nicole L. Neff · 2011

541 citations

Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS).

James C. Kaufman · 2012

350 citations

How art is appreciated.

Helmut Leder, Gernot Gerger · 2012

147 citations

Dance as a subject for empirical aesthetics.

Julia F. Christensen, Beatriz Calvo-Merino · 2013

63 citations