Abstract
AbstractLight is often characterized only by its classical properties, like intensity or coherence. When looking at its quantum properties, described by photon correlations, new information about the state of the matter generating the radiation can be revealed. In particular the difference between independent and entangled emitters, which is at the heart of quantum mechanics, can be made visible in the photon statistics of the emitted light. The well-studied phenomenon of superradiance occurs when quantum–mechanical correlations between the emitters are present. Notwithstanding, superradiance was previously demonstrated only in terms of classical light properties. Here, we provide the missing link between quantum correlations of the active material and photon correlations in the emitted radiation. We use the superradiance of quantum dots in a cavity-quantum electrodynamics laser to show a direct connection between superradiant pulse emission and distinctive changes in the photon correlation function. This directly demonstrates the importance of quantum–mechanical correlations and their transfer between carriers and photons in novel optoelectronic devices.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
31
[1]
Loudon., R. The quantum theory of light 2 edition Clarendon Press (1983).
[2]
Wiersig, J. et al. Direct observation of correlations between individual photon emission events of a microcavity laser. Nature 460, 245–249 (2009). 10.1038/nature08126
[3]
Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission

M. Gross, S. Haroche

Physics Reports 1982 10.1016/0370-1573(82)90102-8
[4]
Brandes, T. Coherent and collective quantum optical effects in mesoscopic systems. Phys. Rep. 408, 315–474 (2005). 10.1016/j.physrep.2004.12.002
[5]
Scheibner, M. et al. Superradiance of quantum dots. Nat. Phys. 3, 106–110 (2007). 10.1038/nphys494
[6]
Kozub, M., Pawicki, L. & Machnikowski, P. Enhanced spontaneous optical emission from inhomogeneous ensembles of quantum dots is induced by short-range coupling. Phys. Rev. B 86, 121305 (2012). 10.1103/physrevb.86.121305
[7]
Mlynek, J. A., Abdumalikov, A. A., Eichler, C. & Wallraff, A. Observation of dicke superradiance for two artificial atoms in a cavity with high decay rate. Nat. Commun. 5, 5186 (2014). 10.1038/ncomms6186
[8]
Bohnet, J. G. et al. A steady-state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon. Nature 484, 78–81 (2012). 10.1038/nature10920
[9]
Ii, G. T. N. et al. Giant superfluorescent bursts from a semiconductor magneto-plasma. Nat. Phys. 8, 219–224 (2012). 10.1038/nphys2207
[10]
Bhatti, D., von Zanthier, J. & Agarwal., G. S. Superbunching and nonclassicality as new hallmarks of superradiance. Sci. Rep. 5, 17335 (2015). 10.1038/srep17335
[11]
Temnov, V. V. & Woggon, U. Photon statistics in the cooperative spontaneous emission. Opt. Express 17, 5774–5782 (2009). 10.1364/oe.17.005774
[12]
Aufféves, A., Gerace, D., Portolan, S., Drezet, A. & Santos, M. F. Few emitters in a cavity: from cooperative emission to individualization. New J. Phys. 13, 093020 (2011). 10.1088/1367-2630/13/9/093020
[13]
Meiser, D. & Holland, M. J. Intensity fluctuations in steady-state superradiance. Phys. Rev. A 81, 063827 (2010). 10.1103/physreva.81.063827
[14]
Strauf, S. et al. Self-tuned quantum dot gain in photonic crystal lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 127404 (2006). 10.1103/physrevlett.96.127404
[15]
Ulrich, S. M. et al. Photon statistics of semiconductor microcavity lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 043906 (2007). 10.1103/physrevlett.98.043906
[16]
Nomura, M., Kumagai, N., Iwamoto, S., Ota, Y. & Arakawa, Y. Laser oscillation in a strongly coupled single-quantum-dotnanocavity system. Nat. Phys. 6, 279–283 (2010). 10.1038/nphys1518
[17]
Ates, S. et al. Non-resonant dot-cavity coupling and its potential for resonant single-quantum-dot spectroscopy. Nat. Photon 3, 724728 (2009). 10.1038/nphoton.2009.215
[18]
Laucht, A. et al. Temporal monitoring of nonresonant feeding of semiconductor nanocavity modes by quantum dot multiexciton transitions. Phys. Rev. B 81, 241302 (2010). 10.1103/physrevb.81.241302
[19]
Steinhoff, A. et al. Combined influence of Coulomb interaction and polarons on the carrier dynamics in InGaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 88, 205309 (2013). 10.1103/physrevb.88.205309
[20]
Kira, M. & Koch., S. W. Semiconductor Quantum Optics Cambridge University Press (2011). 10.1017/cbo9781139016926
[21]
Florian, M., Gies, C., Jahnke, F., Leymann, H. A. M. & Wiersig, J. Equation-of-motion technique for finite-size quantum-dot systems: cluster expansion method. Phys. Rev. B 87, 165306 (2013). 10.1103/physrevb.87.165306
[22]
Leymann, H. A. M., Foerster, A. & Wiersig, J. Expectation value based equation-of-motion approach for open quantum systems: a general formalism. Phys. Rev. B 89, 085308 (2014). 10.1103/physrevb.89.085308
[23]
Meiser, D., Ye, Y., Carlson, D. R. & Holland, M. J. Prospects for a millihertz-linewidth laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 163601 (2009). 10.1103/physrevlett.102.163601
[24]
Gies, C., Wiersig, J., Lorke, M. & Jahnke, F. Semiconductor model for quantum-dot-based microcavity lasers. Phys. Rev. A 75, 013803 (2007). 10.1103/physreva.75.013803
[25]
Chow, W., Jahnke, F. & Gies, C. Emission properties of nanolasers during transition to lasing. Light: Sci. Appl. 3, e201 (2014). 10.1038/lsa.2014.82
[26]
Ritter, S., Gartner, P., Gies, C. & Jahnke, F. Emission properties and photon statistics of a single quantum dot laser. Opt. Express 18, 9909–9921 (2010). 10.1364/oe.18.009909
[27]
Björk, G. & Yamamoto, Y. Analysis of semiconductor microcavity lasers using rate equations. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27, 2386–2396 (1991). 10.1109/3.100877
[28]
Aßmann, M., Veit, F., Bayer, M., van der Poel, M. & Hvam, J. M. Higher-order photon bunching in a semiconductor microcavity. Science 325, 297–300 (2009). 10.1126/science.1174488
[29]
Aßmann, M. et al. Measuring the dynamics of second-order photon correlation functions inside a pulse with picosecond time resolution. Opt. Express 18, 20229–20241 (2010). 10.1364/oe.18.020229
[30]
Kazimierczuk, T. et al. Photon-statistics excitation spectroscopy of a quantum-dot micropillar laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 027401 (2015). 10.1103/physrevlett.115.027401
[31]
Mandel, L. & Wolf., E. Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics Cambridge University Press (1995). 10.1017/cbo9781139644105
Cited By
148
Photonics and Nanostructures - Fund...
Physical Review Letters
Applied Physics Letters
Nature
IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics
Metrics
148
Citations
31
References
Details
Published
May 10, 2016
Vol/Issue
7(1)
License
View
Cite This Article
Frank Jahnke, Christopher Gies, Marc Aßmann, et al. (2016). Giant photon bunching, superradiant pulse emission and excitation trapping in quantum-dot nanolasers. Nature Communications, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11540
Related

You May Also Like

Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data

Kosuke Yoshihara, Maria Shahmoradgoli · 2013

7,687 citations

Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat

Suoqin Jin, Christian F. Guerrero-Juarez · 2021

6,760 citations

In situ click chemistry generation of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors

Atul Bhardwaj, Jatinder Kaur · 2017

6,689 citations