journal article May 06, 2012

On the reality of the quantum state

View at Publisher Save 10.1038/nphys2309
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
23
[1]
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen

Physical Review 1935 10.1103/physrev.47.777
[2]
Popper, K. R. in Quantum Theory and Reality (ed. Bunge, M.) Ch. 1 (Springer, 1967).
[3]
Ballentine, L. E. The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 358–381 (1970).
[4]
Peierls, R. E. Surprises in Theoretical Physics 32 (Princeton Univ. Press, 1979).
[5]
Jaynes, E. T. in Foundations of Radiation Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics (ed. Barut, A. O.) (Plenum, 1980).
[6]
Zeilinger, A. Letter. Phys. Today 52, 13–15 (February, 1999).
[7]
Caves, C. M., Fuchs, C. A. & Schack, R. Quantum probabilities as bayesian probabilities. Phys. Rev. A 65, 022305 (2002). 10.1103/physreva.65.022305
[8]
Spekkens, R. W. Evidence for the epistemic view of quantum states: A toy theory. Phys. Rev. A 75, 032110 (2007). 10.1103/physreva.75.032110
[9]
Jaynes, E. T. in Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information (ed. Zurek, W. H.) 381 (Addison-Wesley, 1990).
[10]
Harrigan, N. & Spekkens, R. W. Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states. Found. Phys. 40, 125–157 (2010). 10.1007/s10701-009-9347-0
[11]
Caves, C. M., Fuchs, C. A. & Schack, R. Conditions for compatibility of quantum-state assignments. Phys. Rev. A 66, 062111 (2002). 10.1103/physreva.66.062111
[12]
Gibbs, A. L. & Su, F. E. On choosing and bounding probability metrics. Int. Stat. Rev. 70, 419–435 (2002). 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00178.x
[13]
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox

J. S. Bell

Physics Physique Fizika 1964 10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195
[14]
Hall, M. J. W. Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations based on relaxing measurement independence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 250404 (2010). 10.1103/physrevlett.105.250404
[15]
Barrett, J. & Gisin, N. How much measurement independence is needed to demonstrate nonlocality? Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 100406 (2011). 10.1103/physrevlett.106.100406
[16]
Lewis, P. G., Jennings, D., Barrett, J. & Rudolph, T. The quantum state can be interpreted statistically. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.6554 (2012).
[17]
Spekkens, R. W. Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements. Phys. Rev. A 71, 052108 (2005). 10.1103/physreva.71.052108
[18]
Einstein, A. Letter to Schrödinger (1935). Translation from Howard, D. Einstein on locality and separability. Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 16, 171–201 (1985). 10.1016/0039-3681(85)90001-9
[19]
Hardy, L. Quantum ontological excess baggage. Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. B 35, 267–276 (2004).
[20]
Montina, A. Exponential complexity and ontological theories of quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A 77, 022104 (2008). 10.1103/physreva.77.022104
[21]
Montina, A. State-space dimensionality in short-memory hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. A 83, 032107 (2011). 10.1103/physreva.83.032107
[22]
Regev, O. & Klartag, B. Proc. 43rd Annual ACM Symp. Theory Comput., STOC’11 31–40 (ACM, 2011). 10.1145/1993636.1993642
[23]
Fuchs, C. A. QBism, the perimeter of quantum Bayesianism. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.5209 (2010).
Metrics
514
Citations
23
References
Details
Published
May 06, 2012
Vol/Issue
8(6)
Pages
475-478
License
View
Cite This Article
Matthew F. Pusey, Jonathan Barrett, Terry Rudolph (2012). On the reality of the quantum state. Nature Physics, 8(6), 475-478. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2309
Related

You May Also Like