Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
38
[1]
IPCC Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation Vol. 582 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).
[2]
McDowell, N. et al. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol. 178, 719–739 (2008). 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x
[3]
Körner, C. Carbon limitation in trees. J. Ecol. 91, 4–17 (2003). 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00742.x
[4]
Reichstein, M. et al. Climate extremes and the carbon cycle. Nature 500, 287–295 (2013). 10.1038/nature12350
[5]
Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011). 10.1126/science.1201609
[6]
Ciais, P. et al. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437, 529–533 (2005). 10.1038/nature03972
[7]
Zha, T. S. et al. Gross and aboveground net primary production at Canadian forest carbon flux sites. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 174–175, 54–64 (2013). 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.02.004
[8]
Guillemot, J. et al. The dynamic of the annual carbon allocation to wood in European tree species is consistent with a combined source–sink limitation of growth: implications for modelling. Biogeosciences 12, 2773–2790 (2015). 10.5194/bg-12-2773-2015
[9]
Fatichi, S., Leuzinger, S. & Körner, C. Moving beyond photosynthesis: from carbon source to sink-driven vegetation modeling. New Phytol. 201, 1086–1095 (2014). 10.1111/nph.12614
[10]
Klein, T. & Hoch, G. Tree carbon allocation dynamics determined using a carbon mass balance approach. New Phytol. 205, 147–159 (2015). 10.1111/nph.12993
[11]
Ruehr, N. et al. Effects of drought on allocation of recent carbon: from beech leaves to soil respiration. New Phytol. 184, 950–961 (2009). 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03044.x
[12]
Arndt, S. K., Clifford, S. C., Wanek, W., Jones, H. G. & Popp, M. Physiological and morphological adaptations of the fruit tree Ziziphus rotundifolia in response to progressive drought stress. Tree Physiol. 21, 705–715 (2001). 10.1093/treephys/21.11.705
[13]
Galvez, D. A., Landhausser, S. M. & Tyree, M. T. Root carbon reserve dynamics in aspen seedlings: does simulated drought induce reserve limitation? Tree Physiol. 31, 250–257 (2011). 10.1093/treephys/tpr012
[14]
Sala, A., Woodruff, D. R. & Meinzer, F. C. Carbon dynamics in trees: feast or famine? Tree Physiol. 32, 764–775 (2012). 10.1093/treephys/tpr143
[15]
Hasibeder, R., Fuchslueger, L., Richter, A. & Bahn, M. Summer drought alters carbon allocation to roots and root respiration in mountain grassland. New Phytol. 205, 1117–1127 (2015). 10.1111/nph.13146
[16]
Ashraf, M. & Foolad, M. R. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59, 206–216 (2007). 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006
[17]
Wiley, E. & Helliker, B. A re-evaluation of carbon storage in trees lends greater support for carbon limitation to growth. New Phytol. 195, 285–289 (2012). 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04180.x
[18]
Unger, S., Máguas, C., Pereira, J. S., David, T. S. & Werner, C. The influence of precipitation pulses on soil respiration – assessing the “Birch effect” by stable carbon isotopes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 1800–1810 (2010). 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.06.019
[19]
Birch, H. F. Mineralisation of plant nitrogen following alternate wet and dry conditions. Plant Soil 20, 43–49 (1964). 10.1007/bf01378096
[20]
Ogle, K. et al. Quantifying ecological memory in plant and ecosystem processes. Ecol. Lett. 18, 221–235 (2015). 10.1111/ele.12399
[21]
Kuzyakov, Y. & Gavrichkova, O. Review: Time lag between photosynthesis and carbon dioxide efflux from soil: a review of mechanisms and controls. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 3386–3406 (2010). 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02179.x
[22]
Volkmann, T., Haberer, K., Gessler, A. & Weiler, M. High-resolution isotope measurements resolve rapid ecohydrological dynamics at the soil-plant interface. New Phytol. 210, 839–849 (2016). 10.1111/nph.13868
[23]
Ectomycorrhizas and water relations of trees: a review

Tarja Lehto, Janusz J. Zwiazek

Mycorrhiza 2011 10.1007/s00572-010-0348-9
[24]
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Pervasive drought legacies in forest ecosystems and their implications for carbon models. Science 349, 528–532 (2015). 10.1126/science.aab1833
[25]
Hill, P. W. et al. Living roots magnify the response of soil organic carbon decomposition to temperature in temperate grassland. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 1368–1375 (2015). 10.1111/gcb.12784
[26]
Tognetti, R., Michelozzi, M. & Borghetti, M. The response of European beech seedlings from two Italian populations to drought and recovery. Trees Struct. Funct. 9, 348–354 (1995). 10.1007/bf00202499
[27]
Gallé, A. & Feller, U. Changes of photosynthetic traits in beech under severe drought stress and during recovery. Physiol. Plant. 131, 412–421 (2007). 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00972.x
[28]
Albert, K. R., Mikkelsen, T. N., Michelsen, A., Ro-Poulsen, H. & van der Linden, L. Interactive effects of drought, elevated CO2 and warming on photosynthetic capacity and photosystem performance in temperate heath plants. J. Plant Physiol. 168, 1550–1561 (2011). 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.02.011
[29]
Bader, M. K. F. & Körner, C. No overall stimulation of soil respiration under mature deciduous forest trees after 7 years of CO2 enrichment. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 2830–2843 (2010). 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02159.x
[30]
Lang, S. Q., Bernasconi, S. M. & Früh-Green, G. L. Stable isotope analysis of organic carbon in small (µg C) samples and dissolved organic matter using a GasBench preparation device. Rapid. Comm. Mass Spectrom. 26, 9–16 (2012). 10.1002/rcm.5287
[31]
Högberg, P. et al. High temporal resolution tracing of photosynthate carbon from the tree canopy to forest soil microorganisms. New Phytol. 177, 220–228 (2008). 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02238.x
[32]
Ohlsson, K. E. A. et al. Uncertainties in static closed chamber measurements of the carbon isotopic ratio of soil-respired CO2 . Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 2273–2276 (2005). 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.023
[33]
Subke, J. A. et al. Feedback interactions between needle litter decomposition and rhizosphere activity. Oecologia 139, 551–559 (2004). 10.1007/s00442-004-1540-4
[34]
Erxleben, A., Gessler, A., Vervliet-Scheebaum, M. & Reski, R. Metabolite profiling of the moss Physcomitrella patens reveals evolutionary conservation of osmoprotective substances. Plant Cell Rep. 31, 427–436 (2012). 10.1007/s00299-011-1177-9
[35]
Gessler, A. et al. On the metabolic origin of the carbon isotope composition of CO2 evolved from darkened light-acclimated leaves in Ricinus communis. New Phytol. 181, 374–386 (2009). 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02672.x
[36]
Schneider, S. et al. Soluble N compounds in trees exposed to high loads of N: a comparison of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) grown under field conditions. New Phytol. 134, 103–114 (1996). 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01150.x
[37]
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., Debroy, S. & Sarkar, D., the R Core Team Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models R package version 3.1–118 (CRAN, 2014); http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=nlme
[38]
van Bel, A. The phloem, a miracle of ingenuity. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 125–149 (2003). 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00963.x
Cited By
210
Trends in Microbiology
Nature Reviews Earth & Environm...
Towards a Comparable Quantification of Resilience

Johannes Ingrisch, Michael Bahn · 2018

Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Metrics
210
Citations
38
References
Details
Published
Jul 18, 2016
Vol/Issue
2(8)
License
View
Cite This Article
Frank Hagedorn, Jobin Joseph, Martina Peter, et al. (2016). Recovery of trees from drought depends on belowground sink control. Nature Plants, 2(8). https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.111
Related

You May Also Like