Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
66
[1]
Illes, J., Kirschen, M. P. & Gabrieli, J. D. From neuroimaging to neuroethics. Nature Neurosci. 6, 205 (2003). 10.1038/nn0303-205
[2]
Editorial. Brain scam? Nature Neurosci. 7, 683 (2004). 10.1038/nn0704-683
[3]
Jaffe, S. Fake method for research impartiality (fMRI). Scientist 18, 64 (2004).
[4]
Butler, D. Advances in neuroscience 'may threaten human rights'. Nature 391, 316 (1998). 10.1038/34739
[5]
Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. 328 (President's Council on Bioethics/Harper Collins, Washington DC, 2003).
[6]
Editorial. Does neuroscience threaten human values? Nature Neurosci. 1, 535–536 (1998). 10.1038/2878
[7]
Nelkin, D. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1995).
[8]
Neuendorf, K. A. The Content Analysis Guidebook (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 2002).
[9]
Anonymous. Fear of pain may be worse than pain itself. The New York Times (New York) 14 (22 Jun 1999).
[10]
Anonymous. The cutting edge. The Washington Post (Washington) Z05 (17 Dec 1999).
[11]
Anonymous. Acupuncture: brain images demonstrate pain relief. Pain Cent. Nerv. Syst. Week 13 (17 Dec 1999).
[12]
Biskup, A. Fat really does bring pleasure. The Boston Globe (Boston) C3 (13 Apr 2004).
[13]
Cookson, C. Brain can banish unwanted memorie. Financial Times (Lond.) 11 (9 Jan 2004).
[14]
Blakeslee, S. How brain stores languages. Plain Dealer (Cleveland) 2J (27 Jul 1997).
[15]
Anonymous. Brain stores perceptions into small meaningful chunks. The Hindu (India) (27 Jul 2001).
[16]
Sample, I. & Adam, D. The brain can't lie: brain scans reveal how you think and feel and even how you might behave. The Guardian (Lond.) 4 (20 Nov 2003).
[17]
Anonymous. Odds are that gambling addict's brain is built differently. Times–Picayune (New Orleans) 3 (18 Sep 2003).
[18]
Begley, S. How it all starts inside your brain. Newsweek (New York) 137, 40–42 (12 Feb 2001).
[19]
Bacon, J. Group to prove pornography is addictive. The Daily Universe (Brigham Young University) (12 May 2004).
[20]
Hall, S. S. The scientific method: test–tube moms. The New York Times (New York) 22 (5 Apr 1998).
[21]
Editorial. Silence of the neuroengineers. Nature 423, 787 (2003). 10.1038/423787b
[22]
Hoag, H. Neuroengineering: remote control. Nature 423, 796–798 (2003). 10.1038/423796a
[23]
Rudolph, A. Military: brain-machine could benefit millions. Nature 424, 369 (2003). 10.1038/424369b
[24]
Rizzuto, D. S., Breznen, B. & Greger, B. Military-funded research is not unethical. Nature 424, 369 (2003). 10.1038/424369a
[25]
Abella, H. A. fMRI knows your secrets. Diagn. Imaging 9 (1 Mar 2004).
[26]
Conrad, P. Genetic optimism: framing genes and mental illness in the news. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 25, 225–247 (2001). 10.1023/a:1010690427114
[27]
Geller, G., Bernhardt, B. A. & Holtzman, N. A. The media and the public reaction to genetic research. JAMA 287, 773 (2002). 10.1001/jama.287.6.773-jms0213-3-1
[28]
Condit, C. M., Ferguson, A., Thadhani, C. & Parrott, R. An exploratory study on the impact of news headlines on genetic determinism. Sci. Commun. 22, 379–395 (2001). 10.1177/1075547001022004002
[29]
Herculano-Houzel, S. Do you know your brain? A survey on public neuroscience literacy at the closing of the decade of the brain. Neuroscientist 8, 98–110 (2002). 10.1177/107385840200800206
[30]
Diefenbach, G. J., Diefenbach, D., Baumeister, A. & West, M. Portrayal of lobotomy in the popular press: 1935–1960. J. Hist. Neurosci. 8, 60–69 (1999). 10.1076/jhin.8.1.60.1766
[31]
Farah, M. J. & Wolpe, P. R. Monitoring and manipulating brain function: new neuroscience technologies and their ethical implications. Hastings Cent. Rep. 34, 35–45 (2004). 10.2307/3528418
[32]
Illes, J. & Kirschen, M. New prospects and ethical challenges for neuroimaging within and outside the health care system. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 24, 1932–1934 (2003).
[33]
Thompson, R. A. & Nelson, C. A. Developmental science and the media. Am. Psychol. 56, 5–15 (2001). 10.1037/0003-066x.56.1.5
[34]
Schmitz, M. F., Filippone, P. & Edelman, E. M. Social representations of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder 1988–1997. Cult. Psychol. 9, 383–406 (2003). 10.1177/1354067x0394004
[35]
Goldman, L. S., Genel, M., Bezman, R. & Slanetz, P. J. Diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. JAMA 279, 1100–1107 (1998). 10.1001/jama.279.14.1100
[36]
Diller, L. H. The run on Ritalin: attention deficit disorder and stimulant treatment in the 1990s. Hastings Cent. Rep. 26, 12–18 (1996). 10.2307/3528571
[37]
Rose, S. P. 'Smart drugs': do they work? Are they ethical? Will they be legal? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3, 975–979 (2002). 10.1038/nrn984
[38]
Farah, M. J. et al. Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 5, 421–425 (2004). 10.1038/nrn1390
[39]
Racine, E., Gareau, I. & Doucet, H. The press and public debate: a study of genomics in francophone press (1992–2001). GE3LS Symposium,Vancouver, Canada, 5 Feb 2004.
[40]
Moreno, C., Lujan, J. & Moreno, L. La ingeníera genética humana en la prensa: Analisis de contenido de ABC, El Pais, y La Vanguardia (1988–1993). (Instituto de Estudios Avanzados (CSIC), Madrid, 1996).
[41]
Mulkay, M. Embryos in the news. Public Underst. Sci. 3, 33–51 (1994). 10.1088/0963-6625/3/1/003
[42]
Kohring, M. & Matthes, J. The face(t)s of biotech in the nineties: how the German press framed modern biotechnology. Public Underst. Sci. 11, 143–154 (2002). 10.1088/0963-6625/11/2/304
[43]
Priest, S. H. & Talbert, J. Mass media and the ultimate technological fix: newspaper coverage of biotechnology. SWMCJ 10, 76–85 (1994).
[44]
Craig, D. A. Ethical language and themes in news coverage of genetic testing. J&MCQ 77, 160–174 (2000).
[45]
Petersen, A. Biofantasies: genetics and medicine in the print news media. Soc. Sci. Med. 52, 1255–1268 (2001). 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00229-x
[46]
Monasterky, R. Land mines in the world of mental maps. The Chronicle of Higher Education (USA) 20 (2 Nov 2001).
[47]
Tambor, E. S., Bernhardt, B. A., Rodgers, J., Holtzman, N. A. & Geller, G. Mapping the human genome: an assessment of media coverage and public reaction. Genet. Med. 4, 31–36 (2002). 10.1097/00125817-200201000-00006
[48]
Gostin, L. O. Ethical considerations of psychosurgery: the unhappy legacy of the prefrontal lobotomy. J. Med. Ethics 6, 149–156 (1980). 10.1136/jme.6.3.149
[49]
Kulynych, J. Legal and ethical issues in neuroimaging research: human subjects protection, medical privacy, and the public communication of research results. Brain Cogn. 50, 345–357 (2002). 10.1016/s0278-2626(02)00518-3
[50]
Illes, J. & Racine, E. Imaging or Imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. Am. J. Bioeth. (in the press). 10.1080/15265160590923358

Showing 50 of 66 references

Cited By
274
Metrics
274
Citations
66
References
Details
Published
Feb 01, 2005
Vol/Issue
6(2)
Pages
159-164
License
View
Cite This Article
Eric Racine, Ofek Bar-Ilan, Judy Illes (2005). fMRI in the public eye. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(2), 159-164. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1609
Related

You May Also Like

Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain

Maurizio Corbetta, Gordon L. Shulman · 2002

12,753 citations

Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience

Katherine S. Button, John P. A. Ioannidis · 2013

5,996 citations

The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?

Karl Friston · 2010

5,864 citations