journal article Open Access Apr 01, 2021

Optimal operation points for ultrafast, highly coherent Ge hole spin-orbit qubits

View at Publisher Save 10.1038/s41534-021-00386-2
Abstract
AbstractStrong spin-orbit interactions make hole quantum dots central to the quest for electrical spin qubit manipulation enabling fast, low-power, scalable quantum computation. Yet it is important to establish to what extent spin-orbit coupling exposes qubits to electrical noise, facilitating decoherence. Here, taking Ge as an example, we show that group IV gate-defined hole spin qubits generically exhibit optimal operation points, defined by the top gate electric field, at which they are both fast and long-lived: the dephasing rate vanishes to first order in the electric field noise along with all directions in space, the electron dipole spin resonance strength is maximized, while relaxation is drastically reduced at small magnetic fields. The existence of optimal operation points is traced to group IV crystal symmetry and properties of the Rashba spin-orbit interaction unique to spin-3/2 systems. Our results overturn the conventional wisdom that fast operation implies reduced lifetimes and suggest group IV hole spin qubits as ideal platforms for ultra-fast, highly coherent scalable quantum computing.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
81
[1]
Loss, D. & DiVincenzo, D. P. Quantum computation with quantum dots. Phys. Rev. A 57, 120–126 (1998). 10.1103/physreva.57.120
[2]
Fischer, J., Trif, M., Coish, W. & Loss, D. Spin interactions, relaxation and decoherence in quantum dots. Solid State Commun. 149, 1443 – 1450 (2009). 10.1016/j.ssc.2009.04.033
[3]
Chesi, S., Wang, X. J. & Coish, W. A. Controlling hole spins in quantum dots and wells. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129, 86 (2014). 10.1140/epjp/i2014-14086-2
[4]
Lodari, M. et al. Light effective hole mass in undoped Ge/SiGe quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B 100, 041304 (2019). 10.1103/physrevb.100.041304
[5]
Liles, S. D. et al. Spin and orbital structure of the first six holes in a silicon metal-oxide-semiconductor quantum dot. Nat. Commun. 9, 3255 (2018). 10.1038/s41467-018-05700-9
[6]
Watzinger, H. et al. A germanium hole spin qubit. Nat. Commun. 9, 3902 (2018). 10.1038/s41467-018-06418-4
[7]
Watzinger, H. et al. Heavy-hole states in germanium hut wires. Nano Lett. 16, 6879–6885 (2016). 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02715
[8]
Vukušić, L. et al. Single-shot readout of hole spins in Ge. Nano Lett. 18, 7141–7145 (2018). 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03217
[9]
Ares, N. et al. Sige quantum dots for fast hole spin Rabi oscillations. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 263113 (2013). 10.1063/1.4858959
[10]
Mizokuchi, R., Maurand, R., Vigneau, F., Myronov, M. & De Franceschi, S. Ballistic one-dimensional holes with strong g-factor anisotropy in germanium. Nano Lett. 18, 4861–4865 (2018). 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01457
[11]
Bohuslavskyi, H. et al. Pauli blockade in a few-hole PMOS double quantum dot limited by spin-orbit interaction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 193101 (2016). 10.1063/1.4966946
[12]
Zwanenburg, F. A., van Rijmenam, C. E. W. M., Fang, Y., Lieber, C. M. & Kouwenhoven, L. P. Spin states of the first four holes in a silicon nanowire quantum dot. Nano Lett. 9, 1071–1079 (2009). 10.1021/nl803440s
[13]
Spruijtenburg, P. C. et al. Single-hole tunneling through a two-dimensional hole gas in intrinsic silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 192105 (2013). 10.1063/1.4804555
[14]
Brauns, M. et al. Anisotropic Pauli spin blockade in hole quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 94, 041411 (2016). 10.1103/physrevb.94.041411
[15]
Salfi, J., Mol, J. A., Culcer, D. & Rogge, S. Charge-insensitive single-atom spin-orbit qubit in silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 246801 (2016). 10.1103/physrevlett.116.246801
[16]
Salfi, J., Tong, M., Rogge, S. & Culcer, D. Quantum computing with acceptor spins in silicon. Nanotechnology 27, 244001 (2016). 10.1088/0957-4484/27/24/244001
[17]
Hung, J.-T., Marcellina, E., Wang, B., Hamilton, A. R. & Culcer, D. Spin blockade in hole quantum dots: Tuning exchange electrically and probing Zeeman interactions. Phys. Rev. B 95, 195316 (2017). 10.1103/physrevb.95.195316
[18]
Terrazos, L. A. et al. Qubits Based on Hole Quantum Dots in Strained Ge. Phys. Rev. B Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.10320. (2018).
[19]
van der Heijden, J. et al. Readout and control of the spin-orbit states of two coupled acceptor atoms in a silicon transistor. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat9199 (2018). 10.1126/sciadv.aat9199
[20]
Chekhovich, E. A. et al. Nuclear spin effects in semiconductor quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 12, 494 EP – (2013). 10.1038/nmat3652
[21]
Kyrychenko, F. V. & Kossut, J. Diluted magnetic semiconductor quantum dots: an extreme sensitivity of the hole Zeeman splitting on the aspect ratio of the confining potential. Phys. Rev. B 70, 205317 (2004). 10.1103/physrevb.70.205317
[22]
Nadj-Perge, S., Frolov, S. M., Bakkers, E. P. A. M. & Kouwenhoven, L. P. Spin-orbit qubit in a semiconductor nanowire. Nature 468, 1084 EP (2010). 10.1038/nature09682
[23]
Golovach, V. N., Khaetskii, A. & Loss, D. Spin relaxation at the singlet-triplet crossing in a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. B 77, 045328 (2008). 10.1103/physrevb.77.045328
[24]
Rossi, A. et al. Detection of variable tunneling rates in silicon quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 133506 (2011). 10.1063/1.3573991
[25]
Yoneda, J. et al. A quantum-dot spin qubit with coherence limited by charge noise and fidelity higher than 99.9%. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 102–106 (2018). 10.1038/s41565-017-0014-x
[26]
Stano, P. et al. Orbital effects of a strong in-plane magnetic field on a gate-defined quantum dot. Phys. Rev. B 99, 085308 (2019). 10.1103/physrevb.99.085308
[27]
Bulaev, D. V. & Loss, D. Electric dipole spin resonance for heavy holes in quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 097202 (2007). 10.1103/physrevlett.98.097202
[28]
Golovach, V. N., Borhani, M. & Loss, D. Electric-dipole-induced spin resonance in quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 74, 165319 (2006). 10.1103/physrevb.74.165319
[29]
Coish, W. A., Golovach, V. N., Egues, J. C. & Loss, D. Measurement, control, and decay of quantum-dot spins. Phys. Status Solid. 243, 3658–3672 (2006). 10.1002/pssb.200642348
[30]
Szumniak, P., Bednarek, S., Pawłowski, J. & Partoens, B. All-electrical control of quantum gates for single heavy-hole spin qubits. Phys. Rev. B 87, 195307 (2013). 10.1103/physrevb.87.195307
[31]
Budich, J. C., Rothe, D. G., Hankiewicz, E. M. & Trauzettel, B. All-electric qubit control in heavy hole quantum dots via non-abelian geometric phases. Phys. Rev. B 85, 205425 (2012). 10.1103/physrevb.85.205425
[32]
Salis, G. et al. Electrical control of spin coherence in semiconductor nanostructures. Nature 414, 619–622 (2001). 10.1038/414619a
[33]
Pribiag, V. S. et al. Electrical control of single hole spins in nanowire quantum dots. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 170 EP – (2013). 10.1038/nnano.2013.5
[34]
Khaetskii, A. V. Spin relaxation in semiconductor mesoscopic systems. Phys. E10, 27 – 31 (2001). 10.1016/s1386-9477(01)00047-9
[35]
Gvozdić, D. M. & Ekenberg, U. Superiority of p-type spin transistors. Phys. Scripta T126, 21–26 (2006). 10.1088/0031-8949/2006/t126/005
[36]
Woods, L. M., Reinecke, T. L. & Kotlyar, R. Hole spin relaxation in quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 69, 125330 (2004). 10.1103/physrevb.69.125330
[37]
Hsieh, C.-Y., Cheriton, R., Korkusinski, M. & Hawrylak, P. Valence holes as Luttinger spinor based qubits in quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 80, 235320 (2009). 10.1103/physrevb.80.235320
[38]
Kloeffel, C., Trif, M. & Loss, D. Strong spin-orbit interaction and helical hole states in Ge/Si nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 84, 195314 (2011). 10.1103/physrevb.84.195314
[39]
Machnikowski, P., Gawarecki, K. & Cywiński, L. Hyperfine interaction for holes in quantum dots: k ⋅ p model. Phys. Rev. B 100, 085305 (2019). 10.1103/physrevb.100.085305
[40]
Szumniak, P., Bednarek, S., Partoens, B. & Peeters, F. M. Spin-orbit-mediated manipulation of heavy-hole spin qubits in gated semiconductor nanodevices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 107201 (2012). 10.1103/physrevlett.109.107201
[41]
Khaetskii, A. V. & Nazarov, Y. V. Spin relaxation in semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 61, 12639–12642 (2000). 10.1103/physrevb.61.12639
[42]
Khaetskii, A. V., Loss, D. & Glazman, L. Electron spin decoherence in quantum dots due to interaction with nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 186802 (2002). 10.1103/physrevlett.88.186802
[43]
Fischer, J. & Loss, D. Hybridization and spin decoherence in heavy-hole quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 266603 (2010). 10.1103/physrevlett.105.266603
[44]
Kobayashi, T. et al. Engineering long spin coherence times of spin–orbit qubits in silicon. Nat. Mater. 20, 38–42, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0743-3 (2021). 10.1038/s41563-020-0743-3
[45]
Yamahata, G. et al. Magnetic field dependence of Pauli spin blockade: a window into the sources of spin relaxation in silicon quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 86, 115322 (2012). 10.1103/physrevb.86.115322
[46]
Hendrickx, N. W., Franke, D. P., Sammak, A., Scappucci, G. & Veldhorst, M. Fast two-qubit logic with holes in germanium. Nature 577, 487 (2020). 10.1038/s41586-019-1919-3
[47]
Durnev, M. V., Glazov, M. M. & Ivchenko, E. L. Spin-orbit splitting of valence subbands in semiconductor nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B 89, 075430 (2014). 10.1103/physrevb.89.075430
[48]
Marcellina, E., Hamilton, A. R., Winkler, R. & Culcer, D. Spin-orbit interactions in inversion-asymmetric two-dimensional hole systems: A variational analysis. Phys. Rev. B 95, 075305 (2017). 10.1103/physrevb.95.075305
[49]
Bermeister, A., Keith, D. & Culcer, D. Charge noise, spin-orbit coupling, and dephasing of single-spin qubits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 192102 (2014). 10.1063/1.4901162
[50]
Culcer, D., Hu, X. & Das Sarma, S. Dephasing of si spin qubits due to charge noise. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 073102 (2009). 10.1063/1.3194778

Showing 50 of 81 references

Metrics
80
Citations
81
References
Details
Published
Apr 01, 2021
Vol/Issue
7(1)
License
View
Cite This Article
Zhanning Wang, Elizabeth Marcellina, Alex. R. Hamilton, et al. (2021). Optimal operation points for ultrafast, highly coherent Ge hole spin-orbit qubits. npj Quantum Information, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-021-00386-2
Related

You May Also Like

Practical challenges in quantum key distribution

Eleni Diamanti, Hoi-Kwong Lo · 2016

685 citations

Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system

Jay M. Gambetta, Jerry M. Chow · 2017

480 citations

IBM Q Experience as a versatile experimental testbed for simulating open quantum systems

Guillermo García-Pérez, Matteo A. C. Rossi · 2020

296 citations

Universal quantum control through deep reinforcement learning

Murphy Yuezhen Niu, Sergio Boixo · 2019

294 citations