From least-cost to SDG-optimal sectoral allocation of Paris Agreement-compatible mitigation efforts

Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Twenty-First Session, Held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015. Part One: Proceedings (UNFCCC, 2016).

[2]

Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (United Nation, 2015); https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

[3]

Schmidt Tagomori, I. et al. Climate policy and the SDGs agenda: how does near-term action on nexus SDGs influence the achievement of long-term climate goals?. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 054001 (2024). 10.1088/1748-9326/ad3973

[4]

Analysing interactions among Sustainable Development Goals with Integrated Assessment Models

Heleen L. van Soest, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Jérôme Hilaire et al.

Global Transitions 2019 10.1016/j.glt.2019.10.004

[5]

von Stechow, C. et al. 2 °C and SDGs: united they stand, divided they fall?. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 034022 (2016). 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034022

[6]

A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda

Bjoern Soergel, Elmar Kriegler, Isabelle Weindl et al.

Nature Climate Change 2021 10.1038/s41558-021-01098-3

[7]

Fujimori, S. et al. Measuring the sustainable development implications of climate change mitigation. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, E085004 (2020). 10.1088/1748-9326/ab9966

[8]

Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

David L. McCollum, Wenji Zhou, Christoph Bertram et al.

Nature Energy 2018 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z

[9]

Iyer, G. et al. Implications of sustainable development considerations for comparability across nationally determined contributions. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 124–129 (2018). 10.1038/s41558-017-0039-z

[10]

Moreno, J. et al. Assessing synergies and trade-offs of diverging Paris-compliant mitigation strategies with long-term SDG objectives. Glob. Environ. Change 78, 102624 (2023). 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102624

[11]

Moreno, J. et al. The impacts of decarbonization pathways on Sustainable Development Goals in the European Union. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 1–14 (2024). 10.1038/s43247-024-01309-7

[12]

Hermwille, L. et al. Ensuring an Effective Global Stocktake with a Sectoral Perspective (Wuppertal Institute, 2022); https://doi.org/10.48506/opus-8033 10.48506/opus-8033

[13]

van de Ven, D. J. et al. Energy and socioeconomic system transformation through a decade of IPCC-assessed scenarios. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 218–226 (2025). 10.1038/s41558-024-02198-6

[14]

Fuhrman, J. et al. Ambitious efforts on residual emissions can reduce CO2 removal and lower peak temperatures in a net-zero future. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 064012 (2024). 10.1088/1748-9326/ad456d

[15]

Stenzel, F. et al. Irrigation of biomass plantations may globally increase water stress more than climate change. Nat. Commun. 12, 1512 (2021). 10.1038/s41467-021-21640-3

[16]

Hirata, A. et al. The choice of land-based climate change mitigation measures influences future global biodiversity loss. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 259 (2024). 10.1038/s43247-024-01433-4

[17]

Hof, C. et al. Bioenergy cropland expansion may offset positive effects of climate change mitigation for global vertebrate diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 13294–13299 (2018). 10.1073/pnas.1807745115

[18]

Madhu, K., Pauliuk, S., Dhathri, S. & Creutzig, F. Understanding environmental trade-offs and resource demand of direct air capture technologies through comparative life-cycle assessment. Nat. Energy 6, 1035–1044 (2021). 10.1038/s41560-021-00922-6

[19]

Rogelj, J. et al. Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 325–332 (2018). 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3

[20]

Edelenbosch, O. Y. et al. Reducing sectoral hard-to-abate emissions to limit reliance on carbon dioxide removal. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 715–722 (2024). 10.1038/s41558-024-02025-y

[21]

Nikas, A., Doukas, H. & Papandreou, A. in Understanding Risks and Uncertainties in Energy and Climate Policy: Multidisciplinary Methods and Tools for a Low Carbon Society (eds Doukas, H., Flamos, A. & Lieu, J.) (Springer, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03152-7 10.1007/978-3-030-03152-7

[22]

Dekker, M. M. et al. Identifying energy model fingerprints in mitigation scenarios. Nat. Energy 8, 1395–1404 (2023). 10.1038/s41560-023-01399-1

[23]

Kowarsch, M. in Understanding and Evaluating the IAM-Based Economics (Springer, 2016); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43281-6_7 10.1007/978-3-319-43281-6_7

[24]

Gambhir, A., Ganguly, G. & Mittal, S. Climate change mitigation scenario databases should incorporate more non-IAM pathways. Joule 6, 2663–2667 (2022). 10.1016/j.joule.2022.11.007

[25]

The Use and Misuse of Models for Climate Policy

Robert S. Pindyck

Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2017 10.1093/reep/rew012

[26]

Sampedro, J. et al. Health co-benefits and mitigation costs as per the Paris Agreement under different technological pathways for energy supply. Environ. Int. 136, 105513 (2020). 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105513

[27]

Soergel, B. et al. Combining ambitious climate policies with efforts to eradicate poverty. Nat. Commun. 12, 2342 (2021). 10.1038/s41467-021-22315-9

[28]

Ambrósio, G., Doelman, J. C., Schipper, A. M., Stehfest, E. & van Vuuren, D. Global sustainability scenarios lead to regionally different outcomes for terrestrial biodiversity. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 104055 (2024). 10.1088/1748-9326/ad73eb

[29]

Séférian, R., Rocher, M., Guivarch, C. & Colin, J. Constraints on biomass energy deployment in mitigation pathways: the case of water scarcity. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 054011 (2018). 10.1088/1748-9326/aabcd7

[30]

Emissions Gap Report 2023: Broken Record—Temperatures Hit New Highs, Yet World Fails to Cut Emissions (Again) (United Nations Environment Programme, 2023); https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/43922 10.59117/20.500.11822/43922

[31]

van de Ven, D.-J. et al. A multimodel analysis of post-Glasgow climate targets and feasibility challenges. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 570–578 (2023). 10.1038/s41558-023-01661-0

[32]

Forouli, A., Nikas, A., Van de Ven, D. J., Sampedro, J. & Doukas, H. A multiple-uncertainty analysis framework for integrated assessment modelling of several sustainable development goals. Environ. Model. Softw. 131, 104795 (2020). 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104795

[33]

Nikas, A. Projecting progress in sustainable development goals vis-à-vis climate action in climate–economy models. PLoS Clim. 3, e0000449 (2024). 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000449

[34]

The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview

Keywan Riahi, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Elmar Kriegler et al.

Global Environmental Change 2017 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009

[35]

Gupta, A. in Handbook of Environmental and Sustainable Finance (Elsevier, 2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803615-0.00001-7 10.1016/b978-0-12-803615-0.00001-7

[36]

What Role for Short-Lived Climate Pollutants in Mitigation Policy?

J. K. Shoemaker, D. P. Schrag, M. J. Molina et al.

Science 2013 10.1126/science.1240162

[37]

Fekete, H. et al. A review of successful climate change mitigation policies in major emitting economies and the potential of global replication. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 137, 110602 (2021). 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110602

[38]

Koasidis, K., Koutsellis, T., Xexakis, G., Nikas, A. & Doukas, H. Understanding expectations from and capabilities of climate-economy models for measuring the impact of crises on sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 414, 137585 (2023). 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137585

[39]

Defining a sustainable development target space for 2030 and 2050

Detlef P. van Vuuren, Caroline Zimm, Sebastian Busch et al.

One Earth 2022 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.01.003

[40]

Zimm, C. et al. Justice considerations in climate research. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 22–30 (2024). 10.1038/s41558-023-01869-0

[41]

Peng, W. et al. Climate policy models need to get real about people—here’s how. Nature 594, 174–176 (2021). 10.1038/d41586-021-01500-2

[42]

Byers, E. et al. AR6 scenarios database. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5886912 (2022). 10.5281/zenodo.5886912

[43]

Fuss, S. et al. Negative emissions—part 2: costs, potentials and side effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063002 (2018). 10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f

[44]

Crippa, M. et al. GHG emissions of all world countries (Publications Office of the European Union, 2023); https://doi.org/10.2760/953322 10.2760/953322

[45]

Hausfather, Z. & Peters, G. P. Emissions—the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature 577, 618–620 (2020). 10.1038/d41586-020-00177-3

[46]

Calvin, K. et al. GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems. Geosci. Model Dev. 12, 677–698 (2019). 10.5194/gmd-12-677-2019

[47]

Zhao, X. et al. Core Model Proposal #399: Updating the SSP Database (v3.0) (Population, GDP, and Labor Force) and Labor Productivity (KLEM) (US Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information, 2024); https://doi.org/10.2172/2999947 10.2172/2999947

[48]

Sampedro, J. et al. Residential energy demand, emissions, and expenditures at regional and income-decile level for alternative futures. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 084031 (2024). 10.1088/1748-9326/ad6015

[49]

Waldhoff, S. et al. Analyzing the distributional impacts of global change on food access and availability in a multi-sector dynamics, human–earth system model. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts GC22B-06 (AGU, 2023).

[50]

gcam_sdg. GitHub https://github.com/bc3LC/gcam_sdg (2025).

Showing 50 of 67 references

Metrics

0

Citations

67

References

Details

Published: Apr 07, 2026
License: View

Authors

European University of Lefke

Konstantinos Koasidis

Funding

European Commission Award: 101056306

Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme Award: 101003866

Cite This Article

Dirk-Jan Van de Ven, Clàudia Rodés-Bachs, Théo Rouhette, et al. (2026). From least-cost to SDG-optimal sectoral allocation of Paris Agreement-compatible mitigation efforts. Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-026-02602-3

From least-cost to SDG-optimal sectoral allocation of Paris Agreement-compatible mitigation efforts

You May Also Like