journal article Open Access Jul 26, 2019

Strong primary care and patients’ survival

View at Publisher Save 10.1038/s41598-019-47344-9
Abstract
AbstractPrimary healthcare is the cornerstone of any healthcare system. A major health system reform to strengthen primary care has been implemented in Germany since 2008. Key components include: voluntary participation, intensive management of patients with chronic diseases, coordination of access to medical specialists, continuous quality improvement, and capitation-based reimbursement. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of this reform on survival of enrolled patients. We conducted a comparative cohorts study with 5-year follow-up, starting in the year 2012 in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. Participants were 1,003,336 enrolled patients and 725,310 control patients. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to compare survival of enrolled patients with a composed control cohort of non-enrolled patients, adjusted for a range of patient and physician characteristics. Average age of enrolled patients was 57.3 years and 56.1% were women. Compared to control patients, they had lower mortality (Hazard Ratio: 0.978; 95% CI: 0.968; 0.989). Participation in chronic disease management programs had independent impact on survival rate (Hazard Ratio 0.744, 95% CI: 0.734; 0.753). We concluded that strong primary care is safe and potentially beneficial in terms of patients’ survival.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
18
[1]
Phillips, R. L. et al. The future role of the family physician in the United States: a rigorous exercise in definition. Ann. Fam. Med. 12, 250–255 (2014). 10.1370/afm.1651
[2]
Starfield, B., Shi, L. & Macinko, J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 83, 457–502 (2005). 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x
[3]
Friedberg, M. W., Rosenthal, M. B., Werner, R. M., Volpp, K. G. & Schneider, E. C. Effects of a Medical Home and Shared Savings Intervention on quality and utilization of care. JAMA Intern. Med. 175, 1362–1368 (2015). 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2047
[4]
Ellner, A. L. & Phillips, R. S. The coming primary care revolution. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 32, 380–386 (2017). 10.1007/s11606-016-3944-3
[5]
Sessums, L. L., McHugh, S. J. & Rajkumar., R. Medicare’s vision for advanced primary care. New directions for care delivery and payment. JAMA 315, 2665–2666 (2016). 10.1001/jama.2016.4472
[6]
Wensing, M., Szecsenyi, J., Stock, C., Kaufmann-Kolle, P. & Laux, G. Evaluation of a program to strengthen general practice care for patients with chronic disease in Germany. BMC Health Serv. Res. 17, 62, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2000-2 (2017). 10.1186/s12913-017-2000-2
[7]
Wensing, M., Kaufmann-Kolle, P., Szecsenyi, J., Stock, C. & Laux, G. Effects of a program to strengthen general practice care on hospitalisation rates: a comparative observational study. Scan. J. Prim. Care. 36, 109–114 (2018). 10.1080/02813432.2018.1459429
[8]
Schneider, A. et al. Costs of coordinated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: results of of a routine data analysis in Bavaria. BMJ Open 6, e011621, https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/6/e011621.long (2016). 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011621
[9]
Friedberg, M. W., Schneider, E. C., Rosenthal, M. B., Volpp, K. G. & Werner, R. M. Association between participation in multilayer medical home intervention and changes in quality, utilization and costs of care. JAMA 311, 815–825 (2014). 10.1001/jama.2014.353
[10]
Bodenheimer, T., Ghorob, A., Willard-Grace, R. & Grumbach, K. The 10 building blocks of high-performing primary care. Ann. Fam. Med. 12, 166–171 (2014). 10.1370/afm.1616
[11]
Reynolds, R. et al. A systematic review of chronic disease management interventions in primary care. BMC Fam Pract 19, 11, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0692-3 (2018). 10.1186/s12875-017-0692-3
[12]
Gerlach, F. M., Szecsenyi, J. & Haefeli, W. E. Evaluation der Hausarztzentrierten Versorgung (HZV) nach §73B SGB V in Baden-Württemberg (2011–2016). (Johann Wolfgang-Goethe Universität Frankfurt und Universitätsklinikum, Heidelberg 2018).
[13]
Gerlach, F. M., Szescenyi, J. & Haefeli, W. E. Evaluation der Hausarztzentrierten Versorgung (HZV) in Baden-Württemberg. Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse 2011–2016. (Johann Wolfgang-Goethe Universität Frankfurt und Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, 2018).
[14]
Sundararajan, V. et al. New ICD‐10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in‐hospital mortality. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 57, 1288–1294 (2004). 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.012
[15]
De Boer, M. R., Waterlander, W. E., Kuijper, L. D. J., Steenhuis, I. H. M. & Twisk, J. W. R. Testing for baseline difference in randomized controlled trials: an unhealthy research behaviour that is hard to eradicate. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Acti 12, 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0162-z (2015). 10.1186/s12966-015-0162-z
[16]
Lin, D., Wei, L. J. & Ying, Z. Checking the Cox Model with Cumulative Sums of Martingale-Based Residuals. Biometrika 80, 557–572 (1993). 10.1093/biomet/80.3.557
[17]
Donithan, M., Van Natta, M. & Tonascia, J. Cox regression analyses using SAS/PHREG. Control. Clin. Trials 13(5), 420 (1992). 10.1016/0197-2456(92)90146-q
[18]
Mansournia, M. A. & Altman, D. G. Population attributable fraction. BMJ 360, k757 (2018). 10.1136/bmj.k757
Metrics
23
Citations
18
References
Details
Published
Jul 26, 2019
Vol/Issue
9(1)
License
View
Funding
AOK Baden-Wuerttemberg (health insurance organisation). There no specific grant number.
AOK Baden Wuerttemberg
Cite This Article
Michel Wensing, Joachim Szecsenyi, Petra Kaufmann-Kolle, et al. (2019). Strong primary care and patients’ survival. Scientific Reports, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47344-9