Structure and conductivity of ionomer in PEM fuel cell catalyst layers: a model-based analysis

W. Olbrich; T. Kadyk; U. Sauter; M. Eikerling; J. Gostick

doi:10.1038/s41598-023-40637-0

journal article Open Access Aug 29, 2023

Structure and conductivity of ionomer in PEM fuel cell catalyst layers: a model-based analysis

W. Olbrich

T. Kadyk U. Sauter M. Eikerling J. Gostick

Scientific Reports Vol. 13 No. 1 · Springer Science and Business Media LLC

View at Publisher Save 10.1038/s41598-023-40637-0

Abstract

AbstractEfforts in design and optimization of catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cells hinge on mathematical models that link electrode composition and microstructure with effective physico-chemical properties. A pivotal property of these layers and the focus of this work is the proton conductivity, which is largely determined by the morphology of the ionomer. However, available relations between catalyst layer composition and proton conductivity are often adopted from general theories for random heterogeneous media and ignore specific features of the microstructure, e.g., agglomerates, film-like structures, or the hierarchical porous network. To establish a comprehensive understanding of the peculiar structure-property relations, we generated synthetic volumetric images of the catalyst layer microstructure. In a mesoscopic volume element, we modeled the electrolyte phase and calculated the proton conductivity using numerical tools. Varying the ionomer morphology in terms of ionomer film coverage and thickness revealed two limiting cases: the ionomer can either form a thin film with high coverage on the catalyst agglomerates; or the ionomer exists as voluminous chunks that connect across the inter-agglomerate space. Both cases were modeled analytically, adapting relations from percolation theory. Based on the simulated data, a novel relation is proposed, which links the catalyst layer microstructure to the proton conductivity over a wide range of morphologies. The presented analytical approach is a versatile tool for the interpretation of experimental trends and it provides valuable guidance for catalyst layer design. The proposed model was used to analyze the formation of the catalyst layer microstructure during the ink stage. A parameter study of the initial ionomer film thickness and the ionomer dispersion parameter revealed that the ionomer morphology should be tweaked towards well-defined films with high coverage of catalyst agglomerates. These implications match current efforts in the experimental literature and they may thus provide direction in electrode materials research for polymer electrolyte fuel cells.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

96

[1]

Pollet, B. G., Kocha, S. S. & Staffell, I. Current status of automotive fuel cells for sustainable transport. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 16, 90–95 (2019). 10.1016/j.coelec.2019.04.021

[2]

Raistrick, I. D. Modified gas diffusion electrode for proton exchange membrane fuel cells, In Proceedings of the Symposium on Diaphragms, Separators, and Ion-Exchange Membranes, Vol. 86, 72, (1986).

[3]

Wilson, M. S. & Gottesfeld, S. Thin-film catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cell electrodes. J. Appl. Electrochem. 22, 1–7 (1992). 10.1007/bf01093004

[4]

Gerling, C., Hanauer, M., Berner, U. & Andreas Friedrich, K. Full factorial in situ characterization of ionomer properties in differential PEM fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 168, 084504 (2021). 10.1149/1945-7111/ac1812

[5]

Huang, J., Li, Z. & Zhang, J. Review of characterization and modeling of polymer electrolyte fuel cell catalyst layer: The blessing and curse of ionomer. Front. Energy 11, 334–364 (2017). 10.1007/s11708-017-0490-6

[6]

Eikerling, M. & Kornyshev, A. Modelling the performance of the cathode catalyst layer of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J. Electroanal. Chem. 453, 89–106 (1998). 10.1016/s0022-0728(98)00214-9

[7]

Wang, Q. et al. Functionally graded cathode catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 151(7), A950 (2004). 10.1149/1.1753580

[8]

Song, D. et al. A method for optimizing distributions of Nafion and Pt in cathode catalyst layers of PEM fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 50, 3347–3358 (2005). 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.12.008

[9]

Secanell, M., Carnes, B., Suleman, A. & Djilali, N. Numerical optimization of proton exchange membrane fuel cell cathodes. Electrochim. Acta 52, 2668–2682 (2007). 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.09.049

[10]

Eikerling, M., Ioselevich, A. & Kornyshev, A. How good are the electrodes we use in PEFC?. Fuel Cells 4, 131–140 (2004). 10.1002/fuce.200400029

[11]

Kobayashi, A. et al. Effect of Pt and ionomer distribution on polymer electrolyte fuel cell performance and durability. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 4, 2307–2317 (2021). 10.1021/acsaem.0c02841

[12]

Ionomer content effect on charge and gas transport in the cathode catalyst layer of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells

Yurii V. Yakovlev, Yevheniia V. Lobko, Maryna Vorokhta et al.

Journal of Power Sources 2021 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229531

[13]

Alink, R. et al. Full parametric study of the influence of ionomer content, catalyst loading and catalyst type on oxygen and ion transport in PEM fuel cell catalyst layers. Molecules 25, 1523 (2020). 10.3390/molecules25071523

[14]

Xing, L. et al. Membrane electrode assemblies for PEM fuel cells: A review of functional graded design and optimization. Energy 177, 445–464 (2019). 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.084

[15]

Materials, technological status, and fundamentals of PEM fuel cells – A review

Yun Wang, Daniela Fernanda Ruiz Diaz, Ken S. Chen et al.

Materials Today 2020 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.06.005

[16]

Suter, T. A. M. et al. Engineering catalyst layers for next generation polymer electrolyte fuel cells: A review of design, materials, and methods. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2101025 (2021). 10.1002/aenm.202101025

[17]

Physically Based Modeling of PEMFC Cathode Catalyst Layers: Effective Microstructure and Ionomer Structure–Property Relationship Impacts

Corey R. Randall, Steven C. DeCaluwe

Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and S... 2020 10.1115/1.4046417

[18]

Kusoglu, A. & Weber, A. Z. New insights into perfluorinated sulfonic-acid ionomers. Chem. Rev. 117, 987–1104 (2017). 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00159

[19]

Lopez-Haro, M. et al. Three-dimensional analysis of Nafion layers in fuel cell electrodes. Nat. Commun. 5, 5229 (2014). 10.1038/ncomms6229

[20]

Morawietz, T., Handl, M., Oldani, C., Friedrich, K. A. & Hiesgen, R. Quantitative in situ analysis of ionomer structure in fuel cell catalytic layers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 27044–27054 (2016). 10.1021/acsami.6b07188

[21]

Komini Babu, S., Chung, H. T., Zelenay, P. & Litster, S. Resolving electrode morphology’s impact on platinum group metal-free cathode performance using nano-CT of 3d hierarchical pore and ionomer distribution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(48), 32764–32777 (2016). 10.1021/acsami.6b08844

[22]

Sun, C.-N., More, K. L. & Zawodzinski, T. A. Investigation of transport properties, microstructure, and thermal behavior of PEFC catalyst layers. ECS Trans. 33, 1207–1215 (2010). 10.1149/1.3484614

[23]

Park, Y.-C., Tokiwa, H., Kakinuma, K., Watanabe, M. & Uchida, M. Effects of carbon supports on Pt distribution, ionomer coverage and cathode performance for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J. Power Sources 315, 179–191 (2016). 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.091

[24]

Doo, G. et al. Tuning the ionomer distribution in the fuel cell catalyst layer with scaling the ionomer aggregate size in dispersion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 17835–17841 (2018). 10.1021/acsami.8b01751

[25]

Susac, D., Berejnov, V., Hitchcock, A. P. & Stumper, J. STXM study of the ionomer distribution in the PEM fuel cell catalyst layers. ECS Trans. 41, 629–635 (2011). 10.1149/1.3635596

[26]

Zeng, R. et al. Possible scenario of forming a catalyst layer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. RSC Adv. 10(9), 5502–5506 (2020). 10.1039/c9ra09864j

[27]

Xie, Z. et al. Fuel cell cathode catalyst layers from “green’’ catalyst inks. Energy Environ. Sci. 1(1), 184 (2008). 10.1039/b808613n

[28]

Xie, J. et al. Influence of ionomer content on the structure and performance of PEFC membrane electrode assemblies. Electrochim. Acta 55, 7404–7412 (2010). 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.067

[29]

Lee, M. et al. New evaluation method for the effectiveness of platinum/carbon electrocatalysts under operating conditions. Electrochim. Acta 55, 8504–8512 (2010). 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.07.071

[30]

Holdcroft, S. Fuel cell catalyst layers: A polymer science perspective. Chem. Mater. 26, 381–393 (2014). 10.1021/cm401445h

[31]

Berlinger, S. A., Garg, S. & Weber, A. Z. Multicomponent, multiphase interactions in fuel-cell inks. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 29, 100744 (2021). 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100744

[32]

Sharma, R. & Andersen, S. M. Zoom in catalyst/ionomer interface in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell electrodes: Impact of catalyst/ionomer dispersion media/solvent. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 38125–38133 (2018). 10.1021/acsami.8b14622

[33]

Van Cleve, T. et al. Dictating Pt-based electrocatalyst performance in polymer electrolyte fuel cells, from formulation to application. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 46953–46964 (2019). 10.1021/acsami.9b17614

[34]

Ink Solvent Dependence of the Ionomer Distribution in the Catalyst Layer of a PEMFC

Alin Orfanidi, Philipp J. Rheinländer, Nicole Schulte et al.

Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2018 10.1149/2.1251814jes

[35]

Ionomer distribution control in porous carbon-supported catalyst layers for high-power and low Pt-loaded proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Sebastian Ott, Alin Orfanidi, Henrike Schmies et al.

Nature Materials 2020 10.1038/s41563-019-0487-0

[36]

A Critical Review of Modeling Transport Phenomena in Polymer-Electrolyte Fuel Cells

Adam Z. Weber, Rodney L. Borup, Robert M. Darling et al.

Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2014 10.1149/2.0751412jes

[37]

Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten von heterogenen Substanzen. I. Dielektrizitätskonstanten und Leitfähigkeiten der Mischkörper aus isotropen Substanzen

D. A. G. Bruggeman

Annalen der Physik 1935 10.1002/andp.19354160705

[38]

Tjaden, B., Cooper, S. J., Brett, D. J., Kramer, D. & Shearing, P. R. On the origin and application of the Bruggeman correlation for analysing transport phenomena in electrochemical systems. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 12, 44–51 (2016). 10.1016/j.coche.2016.02.006

[39]

Davis, H. T. The effective medium theory of diffusion in composite media. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 60, 499–501 (1977). 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1977.tb14091.x

[40]

Cernuschi, F., Ahmaniemi, S., Vuoristo, P. & Mäntylä, T. Modelling of thermal conductivity of porous materials: Application to thick thermal barrier coatings. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 24, 2657–2667 (2004). 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2003.09.012

[41]

Chalapat, K. et al. Ferromagnetic resonance in ε-Co magnetic composites. Nanotechnology 25, 485707 (2014). 10.1088/0957-4484/25/48/485707

[42]

Pant, L. M. et al. Along-the-channel modeling and analysis of PEFCs at low stoichiometry: Development of a 1+2d model. Electrochim. Acta 326, 134963 (2019). 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134963

[43]

Gloaguen, F. & Durand, R. Simulations of PEFC cathodes: An effectiveness factor approach. J. Appl. Electrochem. 27(9), 1029–1035 (1997). 10.1023/a:1018478324564

[44]

Boyer, C., Gamburzev, S., Velev, O., Srinivasan, S. & Appleby, A. Measurements of proton conductivity in the active layer of PEM fuel cell gas diffusion electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 43, 3703–3709 (1998). 10.1016/s0013-4686(98)00128-5

[45]

Sánchez-Ramos, A., Gostick, J. T. & García-Salaberri, P. A. Modeling the effect of low Pt loading cathode catalyst layer in polymer electrolyte fuel cells: Part I. Model formulation and validation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 168, 124514 (2021). 10.1149/1945-7111/ac4456

[46]

Weisbrod, K. R. Through-the-electrode model of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. ECS Proc. Vol. 1995–23, 152–166 (1995). 10.1149/199523.0152pv

[47]

A Variational Approach to the Theory of the Effective Magnetic Permeability of Multiphase Materials

Z. Hashin, S. Shtrikman

Journal of Applied Physics 1962 10.1063/1.1728579

[48]

Das, P. K., Li, X. & Liu, Z.-S. Effective transport coefficients in PEM fuel cell catalyst and gas diffusion layers: Beyond Bruggeman approximation. Appl. Energy 87, 2785–2796 (2010). 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.05.006

[49]

Broadbent, S. R. & Hammersley, J. M. Percolation processes: I. Crystals and mazes. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 53, 629–641 (1957). 10.1017/s0305004100032680

[50]

Hunt, A. G., Ewing, R. P., & Ghanbarian, B. Percolation theory for flow in porous media. No. volume 880 in Lecture notes in physics, 3rd ed. (Springer, 2014). OCLC: ocn871300236. 10.1007/978-3-319-03771-4

Showing 50 of 96 references

Cited By

41

Engineering catalyst layer microstructure through dispersion control of high-solid-content inks for PEM fuel cells

Dhinesh kumar Murugaiah, Muhammad Naoshad Islam · 2026

Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicoche...

Metrics

41

Citations

96

References

Details

Published: Aug 29, 2023
Vol/Issue: 13(1)
License: View

Authors

Institut für Energieverfahrenstechnik, Forschungszentrum “Jülich” GmbH, D-52425 Jülich, Germany

J

J. Gostick

Funding

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst

Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH

Forschungszentrum Jülich

Cite This Article

W. Olbrich, T. Kadyk, U. Sauter, et al. (2023). Structure and conductivity of ionomer in PEM fuel cell catalyst layers: a model-based analysis. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40637-0

Structure and conductivity of ionomer in PEM fuel cell catalyst layers: a model-based analysis

You May Also Like