Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries

Campbell, B. M. et al. Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecol. Soc. 22, 8 (2017). 10.5751/es-09595-220408

[3]

A safe operating space for humanity

Johan Rockström, Will Steffen, Kevin Noone et al.

Nature 2009 10.1038/461472a

[4]

Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015). 10.1126/science.1259855

[5]

Jägermeyr, J., Pastor, A., Biemans, H. & Gerten, D. Reconciling irrigated food production with environmental flows for sustainable development goals implementation. Nat. Commun. 8, 15900 (2017). 10.1038/ncomms15900

[6]

Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture

David Tilman, Christian Balzer, Jason Hill et al.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2011 10.1073/pnas.1116437108

[7]

Rockström, J. et al. Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio 46, 4–17 (2017). 10.1007/s13280-016-0793-6

[8]

Searchinger, T. et al. Creating a Sustainable Food Future—A Menu of Solutions to Feed Nearly 10 Billion People by 2050 (World Resources Institute, 2018).

[9]

Foley, J. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011). 10.1038/nature10452

[10]

Mueller, N. D. et al. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490, 254–257 (2012). 10.1038/nature11420

[11]

Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers

J. Poore, T. Nemecek

Science 2018 10.1126/science.aaq0216

[12]

Mauser, W. et al. Global biomass production potentials exceed expected future demand without the need for cropland expansion. Nat. Commun. 6, 8946 (2015). 10.1038/ncomms9946

[13]

Erb, K.-H. et al. Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation. Nat. Commun. 7, 11382 (2016). 10.1038/ncomms11382

[14]

Jalava, M. et al. Diet change and food loss reduction: what is their combined impact on global water use and scarcity? Earths Future 4, 62–78 (2016). 10.1002/2015ef000327

[15]

West, P. C. et al. Leverage points for improving global food security and the environment. Science 345, 325–328 (2014). 10.1126/science.1246067

[16]

Jägermeyr, J. et al. Integrated crop water management might sustainably halve the global food gap. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 025002 (2016). 10.1088/1748-9326/11/2/025002

[17]

Heck, V., Hoff, H., Wirsenius, S., Meyer, C. & Kreft, H. Land use options for staying within the planetary boundaries—synergies and trade-offs between global and local sustainability goals. Global Environ. Change 49, 73–84 (2018). 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.004

[18]

Kummu, M. et al. Lost food, wasted resources: global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Sci. Total Environ. 438, 477–489 (2012). 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.092

[19]

Kummu, M. et al. Bringing it all together: linking measures to secure nations’ food supply. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 29, 98–117 (2017). 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.01.006

[20]

Conijn, J. G., Bindraban, P. S., Schröder, J. J. & Jongschaap, R. E. E. Can our global food system meet food demand within planetary boundaries? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 251, 244–256 (2018). 10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.001

[21]

Henry, R. C. et al. Food supply and bioenergy production within the global cropland planetary boundary. PLoS ONE 13, e0194695 (2018). 10.1371/journal.pone.0194695

[22]

Springmann, M. et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562, 519–525 (2018). 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0

[23]

Willet, W. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019). 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31788-4

[24]

Schaphoff, S. et al. LPJmL4—a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land: part 2—model evaluation. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 1377–1403 (2018). 10.5194/gmd-11-1377-2018

[25]

Heck, V., Lucht, W., Gerten, D. & Popp, A. Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 151–155 (2018). 10.1038/s41558-017-0064-y

[26]

Food Security Indicators (FAO, 2019); www.fao.org/economic/ess/ess-fs/ess-fadata

[27]

Kahiluoto, H., Kuisma, M., Kuokkanen, A., Mikkilä, M. & Linnanen, L. Taking planetary nutrient boundaries seriously: can we feed the people? Glob. Food Sec. 3, 16–21 (2014). 10.1016/j.gfs.2013.11.002

[28]

Rasmussen, L. V. et al. Social-ecological outcomes of agricultural intensification. Nat. Sustain. 1, 275–282 (2018). 10.1038/s41893-018-0070-8

[29]

Fischer, G. Transforming the global food system. Nature 562, 501–502 (2018). 10.1038/d41586-018-07094-6

[30]

Fader, M., Gerten, D., Krause, M., Lucht, W. & Cramer, W. Spatial decoupling of agricultural production and consumption: quantifying dependence of countries on food imports due to domestic land and water constraints. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 014046 (2013). 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014046

[31]

O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F. & Steinberger, J. K. A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nat. Sust. 1, 88–95 (2018). 10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4

[32]

World in Transition: Governing the Marine Heritage (WBGU, 2013).

[33]

Nash, K. L. et al. Planetary boundaries for a blue planet. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1625–1634 (2017). 10.1038/s41559-017-0319-z

[34]

Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science 353, 288–291 (2016). 10.1126/science.aaf2201

[35]

Ostberg, S., Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W. & Gerten, D. Three centuries of dual pressure from land use and climate change on the biosphere. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 044011 (2015). 10.1088/1748-9326/10/4/044011

[36]

Fader, M., Rost, S., Müller, C., Bondeau, A. & Gerten, D. Virtual water content of temperate cereals and maize: present and potential future patterns. J. Hydrol. 384, 218–231 (2010). 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.011

[37]

Pastor, A. V., Ludwig, F., Biemans, H., Hoff, H. & Kabat, P. Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 5041–5059 (2014). 10.5194/hess-18-5041-2014

[38]

Biemans, H. et al. Impact of reservoirs on river discharge and irrigation water supply during the 20th century. Water Resour. Res. 47, W03509 (2011). 10.1029/2009wr008929

[39]

Flörke, M. et al. Domestic and industrial water uses of the past 60 years as a mirror of socio-economic development: a global simulation study. Global Environ. Change 23, 144–156 (2013). 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.018

[40]

de Vries, W., Kros, J., Kroeze, J. C. & Seitzinger, S. P. Assessing planetary and regional nitrogen boundaries related to food security and adverse environmental impacts. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5, 392–402 (2013). 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.004

[41]

Velthof, G. L. & Mosquera, J. Calculation of Nitrous Oxide Emission from Agriculture in the Netherlands: Update of Emission Factors and Leaching Fraction Alterra Report 2251 (Alterra, 2011).

[42]

Bouwman, A. F. et al. Global trends and uncertainties in terrestrial denitrification and N2O emissions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 368, 20130112 (2013). 10.1098/rstb.2013.0112

[43]

Lamarque, J.-F. et al. Multi-model mean nitrogen and sulfur deposition from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP): evaluation of historical and projected future changes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 7997–8018 (2013). 10.5194/acp-13-7997-2013

[44]

Vitousek, P. M., Menge, D. N. L., Reed, S. C. & Cleveland, C. C. Biological nitrogen fixation: rates, patterns and ecological controls in terrestrial ecosystems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 368, 20130119 (2013). 10.1098/rstb.2013.0119

[45]

Cleveland, C. C. et al. Global patterns of terrestrial biological nitrogen (N2) fixation in natural ecosystems. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 13, 623–645 (1999). 10.1029/1999gb900014

[46]

Bodirsky, B. L. et al. N2O emissions of the global agricultural nitrogen cycle—current state and future scenarios. Biogeosciences 9, 4169–4197 (2012). 10.5194/bg-9-4169-2012

[47]

von Bloh, W. et al. Implementing the nitrogen cycle into the dynamic global vegetation, hydrology, and crop growth model LPJmL (version 5.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 2789–2812 (2018). 10.5194/gmd-11-2789-2018

[48]

Lassaletta, L., Billen, G., Grizzetti, B., Anglade, J. & Garnier, J. 50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: the relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 105011 (2014). 10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/105011

[49]

The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) (IUCN and UNEP-WCMC, accessed 20 October 2015); www.protectedplanet.net

[50]

The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection

S. L. Pimm, Clinton N. Jenkins, R. Abell et al.

Science 2014 10.1126/science.1246752

Showing 50 of 60 references

Cited By

523

WQI–Machine Learning Integration with Spatial Data Augmentation for Robust Groundwater Quality Assessment in Data-Limited Arid Regions

Nezha Farhi, Motrih Al-Mutiry · 2026

Sustainability

Diets can be consistent with planetary limits and health targets at the individual level

Caroline Herlev Gebara, Etienne Berthet · 2025

Nature Food

Global water gaps under future warming levels

Lorenzo Rosa, Matteo Sangiorgio · 2025

Nature Communications

The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy, sustainable, and just food systems

Johan Rockström, Shakuntala Haraksingh Thilsted · 2025

The Lancet

Agricultural Diversification, Market Participation, and Dietary Diversity and Quality in Rural Türkiye

Neville N. Suh, Canan F. Abay · 2025

Agribusiness

Planetary boundaries under a land-based climate change mitigation scenario with a food demand transformation: a modelling study

Felicitas D Beier, Jan Philipp Dietrich · 2025

The Lancet Planetary Health

A just world on a safe planet: a Lancet Planetary Health–Earth Commission report on Earth-system boundaries, translations, and transformations

Joyeeta Gupta, Xuemei Bai · 2024

The Lancet Planetary Health

Measuring the Doughnut: A good life for all is possible within planetary boundaries

Hauke Schlesier, Malte Schäfer · 2024

Journal of Cleaner Production

Promoting resilient and sustainable food systems: A systematic literature review on short food supply chains

Fu Jia, Gulnaz Shahzadi · 2024

Journal of Cleaner Production

Enhancing Water Status and Nutrient Uptake in Drought-Stressed Lettuce Plants (Lactuca sativa L.) via Inoculation with Different Bacillus spp. Isolated from the Atacama Desert

Christian Santander, Felipe González · 2024

Plants

Introducing an integrative evaluation framework for assessing the sustainability of different types of urban agriculture

Henriette John, Martina Artmann · 2024

International Journal of Urban Sust...

Critical overview of the implications of a global protein transition in the face of climate change: Key unknowns and research imperatives

Christie L. Lumsden, Jonas Jägermeyr · 2024

One Earth

Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries

Katherine Richardson, Will Steffen · 2023

Science Advances

Sustainability implications of transformation pathways for the bioeconomy

Sascha Stark, Lisa Biber-Freudenberger · 2022

Sustainable Production and Consumpt...

The geography of megatrends affecting European agriculture

Niels Debonne, Matthias Bürgi · 2022

Global Environmental Change

Management of Rhizosphere Microbiota and Plant Production under Drought Stress: A Comprehensive Review

Catalina Vidal, Felipe González · 2022

Plants

Simulation of winter wheat response to variable sowing dates and densities in a high-yielding environment

Sibylle Dueri, Hamish Brown · 2022

Journal of Experimental Botany

Digital nudges to stimulate healthy and pro-environmental food choices in E-groceries

Michiel De Bauw, Lucia Segovia De La Revilla · 2022

Appetite

From planetary to regional boundaries for agricultural nitrogen pollution

L. F. Schulte-Uebbing, A. H. W. Beusen · 2022

Nature

Increasing importance of heat stress for cattle farming under future global climate scenarios

Mario A. Carvajal, Alberto J. Alaniz · 2021

Science of The Total Environment

Metrics

523

Citations

60

References

Details

Published: Jan 20, 2020
Vol/Issue: 3(3)
Pages: 200-208
License: View

Authors

Benjamin Leon Bodirsky

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, P.O. Box 601203, 14412 Potsdam, Germany; and

J

Johan Rockström

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) Member of the Leibniz Association , Potsdam,; Institute of Environmental Science and Geography , University of Potsdam, Potsdam,

S

Sibyll Schaphoff

H

Hans Joachim Schellnhuber

Cite This Article

Dieter Gerten, Vera Heck, Jonas Jägermeyr, et al. (2020). Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 3(3), 200-208. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0465-1

Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries

You May Also Like