Synergizing physics and machine learning for advanced battery management

Manashita Borah; Qiao Wang; Scott Moura; Dirk Uwe Sauer; Weihan Li

doi:10.1038/s44172-024-00273-6

journal article Open Access Sep 17, 2024

Synergizing physics and machine learning for advanced battery management

Manashita Borah Qiao Wang

Scott Moura Dirk Uwe Sauer Weihan Li

Communications Engineering Vol. 3 No. 1 · Springer Science and Business Media LLC

View at Publisher Save 10.1038/s44172-024-00273-6

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

91

[1]

Wang, T., Deason, J., & Shittu, E. The Interplay of Incentives, Electricity Price and Demand on Transport Decarbonization: The Case of Electric Vehicles in the U.S. IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[2]

Goppelt, G. Electrification by 2030—The OEMs’ Plans. ATZ Electron World 17, 36–41 (2022). 10.1007/s38314-022-0825-x

[3]

Murray, M., & Sesia, A. General motors commits to 100% electric vehicles by 2035. Darden Case No. UVA-BC-0284.

[4]

Agbesi, P. K., Ruffino, R. & Hakovirta, M. The development of sustainable electric vehicle business ecosystems. SN Bus. Econ. 3, 143 (2023). 10.1007/s43546-023-00486-5

[5]

Dehkordi, M. A., Yonekura, S. & Kohnepushi, S. Descriptive analysis of Nissan’s electric vehicle commercialization strategies. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 22, 393–403 (2013). 10.1108/jpbm-04-2013-0293

[6]

Pereirnha, P. G. et al. Main trends and challenges in road transportation electrification. Transp. Res. Proc. 33, 235–242 (2018).

[7]

Haram, M. H. S. M. et al. Feasibility of utilizing second life EV batteries: applications, lifespan, economics, environmental impact, assessment, and challenges. Alex. Eng. J. 60, 4517–4536 (2021). 10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.021

[8]

Koch, T. & Asmer, L. Identification of application fields for electrical propulsion techniques and personal aerial vehicles. Transp. Res. Proc. 51, 98–107 (2020).

[9]

Han, H., Yu, J. & Kim, W. An electric airplane: assessing the effect of travelers’ perceived risk, attitude, and new product knowledge. J. Air Transp. Manag. 78, 33–42 (2019). 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.04.004

[10]

Onat, N. C. et al. Exploring the suitability of electric vehicles in the United States. Energy 121, 631–642 (2017). 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.035

[11]

Lombardo, T. et al. Artificial intelligence applied to battery research: hype or reality? Chem. Rev. 122, 10899–10969 (2021). 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00108

[12]

Dong, H., Huang, W. & Zhao, Y. Low complexity state-of-charge estimation for lithium-ion battery pack considering cell inconsistency. J. Power Sources 515, 230599 (2021). 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230599

[13]

Ye, M. et al. Enhanced robust capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries with unlabeled dataset and semi-supervised ML. Expert Syst. Appl. 238, 121892 (2024). 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121892

[14]

Collaborative training of deep neural networks for the lithium-ion battery aging prediction with federated learning

Thomas Kröger, Annalena Belnarsch, Philip Bilfinger et al.

eTransportation 2023 10.1016/j.etran.2023.100294

[15]

Wang, Q., Ye, M., Wie, M., Lian, G. & Li, Y. Random health indicator and shallow neural network based robust capacity estimation for lithium-ion batteries with different fast charging protocols. Energy 271, 127029 (2023). 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127029

[16]

Wang, Q., Ye, M., Cai, X., Sauer, D. U. & Li, W. Transferable data-driven capacity estimation for lithium-ion batteries with deep learning: a case study from laboratory to field applications. Appl. Energy 350, 121737 (2023). 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121747

[17]

Ruan, H. et al. Lithium-ion battery lifetime extension: a review of derating methods. J. Power Sources 563, 232805 (2023). 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.232805

[18]

Collath, N., Tepe, B., Englberger, S., Jossen, A. & Hesse, H. Aging aware operation of lithium-ion battery energy storage systems: a review. J. Energy Storage 55, 105634 (2022). 10.1016/j.est.2022.105634

[19]

Lv, C. et al. An advanced platform for materials development and state prediction in lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 34, 2101474 (2023). 10.1002/adma.202101474

[20]

Frith, J. T., Lacey, M. J. & Ulissi, U. A non-academic perspective on the future of lithium-based batteries. Nat. Commun. 14, 420 (2023). 10.1038/s41467-023-35933-2

[21]

Tu, H., Moura, S., Wang, Y. & Fang, H. Integrating physics-based modeling with ML for lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Energy 329, 120289 (2023). 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120289

[22]

Wang, Y. et al. Physics-informed recurrent neural network with fractional-order gradients for state-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion battery. IEEE J. Radio Freq. Identif. 6, 968–971 (2022). 10.1109/jrfid.2022.3211841

[23]

Kim, S. W., Kwak, E., Kim, J. H., Oh, K. Y. & Lee, S. Modeling and prediction of lithium-ion battery thermal runway via multiphysics-informed neural network. J. Energy Storage 60, 106654 (2023). 10.1016/j.est.2023.106654

[24]

Gasper, P., Gering, K., Dufek, E. & Smith, K. Challenging practices of algebraic battery life models through statistical validation and model identification via machine-learning. J. Electrochem. Soc. 168, 020502 (2021). p. 10.1149/1945-7111/abdde1

[25]

Kim, S. W., Oh, K. Y. & Lee, S. Novel informed deep learning-based prognostics framework for onboard health monitoring of lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Energy 315, 119011 (2022). 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119011

[26]

Arora, A., Murarka, M., Rakshit, D. & Mishra, S. Multiobjective optimal operation strategy for electric vehicle battery swapping station considering battery degradation. Clean. Energy Syst. 4, 100048 (2023). 10.1016/j.cles.2022.100048

[27]

Wu, L., Lyu, Z., Huang, Z., Zhang, C. & Wie, C. Physics-based battery SOC estimation methods: recent advances and future perspectives. J. Energy Chem. 89, 27–40 (2024). 10.1016/j.jechem.2023.09.045

[28]

Garapati, V. K., Dingari, N. N., Mynam, M. & Rai, B. Physics-based reduced order model for sodium-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 170, 010517 (2023). 10.1149/1945-7111/acb01b

[29]

Li, W. et al. Data-driven systematic parameter identification of an electrochemical model for lithium-ion batteries with artificial intelligence. Energy Storage Mater. 44, 557–570 (2022). 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.10.023

[30]

Li, R., O’Kane, S., Huang, J., Marinescu, M. & Offer, G. J. A million cycles in a day: enabling high-throughput computing of lithium-ion battery degradation with physics-based models. J. Power Sources 598, 234184 (2024). 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234184

[31]

Xu, L., Wu, F., Chen, R. & Li, L. Data-driven-aided strategies in battery lifecycle management: prediction, monitoring, and optimization. Energy Storage Mater. 59, 102785 (2023). 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.102785

[32]

Ma, J., Sun, Y. & Zhang, S. Experimental investigation on energy consumption of power battery integrated thermal management system. Energy 270, 126860 (2023). 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126860

[33]

Kim, S., Jung, H., Lee, M., Choi, Y. Y. & Choi, J. I. Model-free reconstruction of capacity degradation trajectory of lithium-ion batteries using early cycle data. eTransportation 17, 100234 (2023). 10.1016/j.etran.2023.100243

[34]

Ruan, H., Chen, J., Ai, W. & Wu, B. Generalised diagnostic framework for rapid battery degradation quantification with deep learning. Energy AI 9, 100158 (2002). 10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100158

[35]

Tian, J. et al. Lithium-ion battery health estimation with real-world data for electric vehicles. Energy 270, 126855 (2023). 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126855

[36]

Guo, W., Sun, Z., Vilsen, S. B., Meng, J. & Stroe, D. I. Review of “grey box” lifetime modeling for lithium-ion battery: combining physics and data-driven methods. J. Energy Storage 56, 105992 (2022). 10.1016/j.est.2022.105992

[37]

Sendek, A. D. et al. ML modeling for accelerated battery materials design in the small data regime. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2200553 (2022). 10.1002/aenm.202200553

[38]

Physics-informed machine learning

George Em Karniadakis, Ioannis G. Kevrekidis, Lu Lu et al.

Nature Reviews Physics 2021 10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5

[39]

Roman, D., Saxena, S., Robu, V., Pecht, M. & Flynn, D. ML pipeline for battery state-of-health estimation. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 447–456 (2021). A machine learning pipeline for the state of health estimation of battery cells cycled under various conditions incorporating different features. 10.1038/s42256-021-00312-3

[40]

Shi, J., Rivera, A. & Wu, D. Battery health management using physics-informed ML: online degradation modeling and remaining useful life prediction. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 179, 109347 (2022). 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109347

[41]

Sun, B. et al. Adaptive evolution enhanced physics-informed neural networks for time-variant health prognosis of lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 556, 232432 (2023). 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232432

[42]

Li, W. et al. Physics-informed neural networks for electrode-level state estimation in lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 506, 230034 (2021). 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230034

[43]

Wu, B., Zhang, B., Deng, C. & Lu, W. Physics-encoded deep learning in identifying battery parameters without direct knowledge of ground truth. Appl. Energy 321, 119390 (2022). 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119390

[44]

Ng, M. F., Zhao, J., Yan, Q., Conduit, G. J. & Seh, Z. W. Predicting the state of charge and health of batteries using data-driven ML. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 161–170 (2020). An example for useing machine learning to learn and improve prediction of state of charge and health of batteries, without the need for reprogramming. 10.1038/s42256-020-0156-7

[45]

Aykol, M., Herring, P. & Anapolsky, A. ML for continuous innovation in battery technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 725–727 (2020). 10.1038/s41578-020-0216-y

[46]

An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of inorganic materials

Nathan J. Szymanski, Bernardus Rendy, Yuxing Fei et al.

Nature 2023 10.1038/s41586-023-06734-w

[47]

Severson, K. A. et al. Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation. Nat. Energy 4, 383–391 (2019). 10.1038/s41560-019-0356-8

[48]

Börner, M. F. et al. Challenges of second-life concepts for retired electric vehicle batteries. Cell Reports Physical Science, 3, (2022). 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101095

[49]

Review on state-of-health of lithium-ion batteries: Characterizations, estimations and applications

Sijia Yang, Caiping Zhang, Jiuchun Jiang et al.

Journal of Cleaner Production 2021 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128015

[50]

Weddle, P. J. et al. Battery state-of-health diagnostics during fast cycling using physics-informed deep-learning. J. Power Sources 585, 233582 (2023). 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233582

Showing 50 of 91 references

Cited By

40

Real-data-driven state of charge estimation for energy storage systems: A gated recurrent unit approach leveraging calibration opportunities

Wenkai Gao, Zhicheng Zhu · 2026

Journal of Energy Storage

Recent advancements in Artificial Neural Network-based temperature prediction and management of lithium-ion batteries: A comprehensive review

Aghyad Al Tahhan, Mohamad Ramadan · 2025

AI Thermal Fluids

Developing safe and high-performance lithium-ion batteries: Strategies and approaches

Guanjun Chen, Rui Tan · 2025

Progress in Materials Science

Metrics

40

Citations

91

References

Details

Published: Sep 17, 2024
Vol/Issue: 3(1)
License: View

Authors

Energy, Controls, and Applications Lab (eCAL), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA

Cite This Article

Manashita Borah, Qiao Wang, Scott Moura, et al. (2024). Synergizing physics and machine learning for advanced battery management. Communications Engineering, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-024-00273-6

Synergizing physics and machine learning for advanced battery management

You May Also Like