journal article Open Access Feb 26, 2014

Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices

View at Publisher Save 10.1038/srep04133
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
27
[1]
Phillips, C. V. Debunking the claim that abstinence is usually healthier for smokers than switching to a low-risk alternative and other observations about anti-tobacco-harm-reduction arguments. Harm Reduct. J. 6, 29 (2009). 10.1186/1477-7517-6-29
[2]
Farsalinos, K. E., Romagna, G., Tsiapras, D., Kyrzopoulos, S. & Voudris, V. Evaluating nicotine levels selection and patterns of electronic cigarette use in a group of “vapers” who had achieved complete substitution of smoking. Subst. Abuse 7, 139–146 (2013).
[3]
Adkison, S. E. et al. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: international tobacco control four-country survey. Am. J. Prev. Med. 44, 207–215 (2013). 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.018
[4]
Dockrell, M., Morison, R., Bauld, L. & McNeill, A. E-Cigarettes: prevalence and attitudes in Great Britain. Nicotine Tob. Res. 15, 1737–1744 (2013). 10.1093/ntr/ntt057
[5]
European Commission. Revision of the tobacco products directive-Press release (European Parliament). (2013) Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdfs/news/expert/infopress/20131216IPR31001/20131216IPR31001_en.pdf (Accessed on December 28, 2013).
[6]
European Commission. Fact sheets for information on specific policy areas of the revision of the Tobacco Products Directive: e-cigarettes. (2013). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/docs/fs_ecigarettes_en.pdf (Accessed on December 28, 2013).
[7]
Farsalinos, K. E., Romagna, G., Tsiapras, D., Kyrzopoulos, S. & Voudris, V. Evaluation of electronic cigarette use (vaping) topography and estimation of liquid consumption: implications for research protocol standards definition and for public health authorities' regulation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 2500–2514 (2013). 10.3390/ijerph10062500
[8]
Vansickel, A. R., Cobb, C. O., Weaver, M. F. & Eissenberg, T. E. A clinical laboratory model for evaluating the acute effects of electronic “cigarettes”: nicotine delivery profile and cardiovascular and subjective effects. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 19, 1945–1953 (2010). 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0288
[9]
Bullen, C. et al. Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: randomised cross-over trial. Tob. Control 19, 98–103 (2010). 10.1136/tc.2009.031567
[10]
Dawkins, L., Turner, J., Roberts, A. & Soar K. ‘Vaping’ profiles and preferences: an online survey of electronic cigarette users. Addiction 108, 1115–1125 (2013). 10.1111/add.12150
[11]
Farsalinos, K. E. et al. Impact of flavour variability on electronic cigarette use experience: an internet survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 10, 7272–7282 (2013). 10.3390/ijerph10127272
[12]
Fagerström, K. Determinants of tobacco use and renaming the FTND to the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence. Nicotine Tob. Res. 14, 75–78 (2012). 10.1093/ntr/ntr137
[13]
Etter, J. F., Le Houezec, J. & Perneger, T. V. A self-administered questionnaire to measure dependence on cigarettes: the cigarette dependence scale. Neuropsychopharmacology 28, 359–370 (2003). 10.1038/sj.npp.1300030
[14]
Etter, J. F. A self-administered questionnaire to measure cigarette withdrawal symptoms: the Cigarette Withdrawal Scale. Nicotine Tob. Res. 7, 47–57 (2005). 10.1080/14622200412331328501
[15]
West, R. & Ussher, M. Is the ten-item Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU-brief) more sensitive to abstinence than shorter craving measures? Psychopharmacology (Berl). 208, 427–432 (2010). 10.1007/s00213-009-1742-x
[16]
Buchhalter, A. R., Acosta, M. C., Evans, S. E., Breland, A. B. & Eissenberg, T. Tobacco abstinence symptom suppression: the role played by the smoking-related stimuli that are delivered by denicotinized cigarettes. Addiction 100, 550–559 (2005). 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01030.x
[17]
Benowitz, N. L., Hukkanen, J. & Jacob, P. 3rd. Nicotine chemistry, metabolism, kinetics and biomarkers. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 29–60 (2009). 10.1007/978-3-540-69248-5_2
[18]
Henningfield, J. E. & Keenan, R. M. Nicotine delivery kinetics and abuse liability. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 61, 743–750 (1993). 10.1037/0022-006x.61.5.743
[19]
Guillem, K. et al. Monoamine oxidase inhibition dramatically increases the motivation to self-administer nicotine in rats. J. Neurosci. 25, 8593–8600 (2005). 10.1523/jneurosci.2139-05.2005
[20]
Benowitz, N. L., Zevin, S. & Jacob, P. 3rd. Suppression of nicotine intake during ad libitum cigarette smoking by high-dose transdermal nicotine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 287, 958–962 (1998). 10.1016/s0022-3565(24)37887-5
[21]
Benowitz, N. L., Jacob, P. 3rd & Savanapridi, C. Determinants of nicotine intake while chewing nicotine polacrilex gum. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 41, 467–473 (1987). 10.1038/clpt.1987.58
[22]
Caponnetto, P. et al. EffiCiency and Safety of an eLectronic cigAreTte (ECLAT) as tobacco cigarettes substitute: A prospective 12-month randomized control design study. PLoS One 8, e66317 (2013). 10.1371/journal.pone.0066317
[23]
Bullen, C. et al. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 382, 1629–1637 (2013). 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61842-5
[24]
West, R. et al. A comparison of the abuse liability and dependence potential of nicotine patch, gum, spray and inhaler. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 149, 198–202 (2000). 10.1007/s002130000382
[25]
Vansickel, A. R., Weaver, M. F. & Eissenberg, T. Clinical laboratory assessment of the abuse liability of an electronic cigarette. Addiction 107, 1493–1500 (2012). 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03791.x
[26]
Breland, A. B., Kleykamp, B. A. & Eissenberg, T. Clinical laboratory evaluation of potential reduced exposure products for smokers. Nicotine Tob. Res. 8, 727–738 (2006). 10.1080/14622200600789585
[27]
Hutsmuller, E. J. & Stitzer, M. L. Manipulation of cigarette craving through rapid smoking: Efficacy and effects on smoking behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 142, 149–157 (1999). 10.1007/s002130050874
Cited By
335
Addictive Behaviors
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Respiratory Care
Respiratory Care
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Metrics
335
Citations
27
References
Details
Published
Feb 26, 2014
Vol/Issue
4(1)
License
View
Cite This Article
Konstantinos E. Farsalinos, Alketa Spyrou, Kalliroi Tsimopoulou, et al. (2014). Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices. Scientific Reports, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04133