The right temporoparietal junction encodes efforts of others during action observation

Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Hiroki Nakata; KAZUYUKI KANOSUE

doi:10.1038/srep30274

journal article Open Access Jul 26, 2016

The right temporoparietal junction encodes efforts of others during action observation

Nobuaki Mizuguchi Hiroki Nakata KAZUYUKI KANOSUE

Scientific Reports Vol. 6 No. 1 · Springer Science and Business Media LLC

View at Publisher Save 10.1038/srep30274

Abstract

AbstractSmooth social interactions require a deep understanding of others’ intentions and feelings. In the present study, to investigate brain regions that respond to inference of others’ effort level, we recorded brain activity during action observation of different effort levels using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We used a dumbbell curl movement to depict a movement requiring effort. To dissociate the factors of effort level of the actor and weight of the dumbbell, we used four combinations of dumbbell weight and actor physique: a thin actor or a built actor lifting a heavy or light dumbbell. During observation of dumbbell curls, the bilateral front-parietal action observation network (AON) was activated. This included the premotor cortices, parietal cortices, visual areas 5/superior temporal cortices (STS), amygdalae, hippocampi, right dorsolateral and ventrolateral frontal cortices. When we evaluated brain regions associated with the actor’s effort level, activity in the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ) and STS was observed. However, activity in the front-parietal AON was independent of the actor’s effort during action observation. This finding suggests that the right TPJ and STS play an important role in the inference of others’ effort levels during the observation of others’ movements.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

37

[1]

Buccino, G. et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13, 400–404 (2001). 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2001.01385.x

[2]

THE MIRROR-NEURON SYSTEM

Giacomo Rizzolatti, Laila Craighero

Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230

[3]

Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis

Frank Van Overwalle, Kris Baetens

NeuroImage 2009 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.009

[4]

Sperduti, M., Guionnet, S., Fossati, P. & Nadel, J. Mirror Neuron System and Mentalizing System connect during online social interaction. Cogn. Process. 15, 307–316 (2014). 10.1007/s10339-014-0600-x

[5]

Ciaramidaro, A., Becchio, C., Colle, L., Bara, B. G. & Walter, H. Do you mean me? Communicative intentions recruit the mirror and the mentalizing system. Soc. Cogn. Affect Neurosci. 9, 909–916 (2014). 10.1093/scan/nst062

[6]

Catmur, C. Understanding intentions from actions: Direct perception, inference, and the roles of mirror and mentalizing systems. Conscious Cogn. 36, 426–433 (2015). 10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.012

[7]

Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E. & Haggard, P. Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Curr. Biol. 16, 1905–1910 (2006). 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.065

[8]

Hamilton, A. F. & Grafton, S. T. Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. J. Neurosci. 26, 1133–1137 (2006). 10.1523/jneurosci.4551-05.2006

[9]

Filimon, F., Nelson, J. D., Hagler, D. J. & Sereno, M. I. Human cortical representations for reaching: mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery. NeuroImage 37, 1315–1328 (2007). 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.008

[10]

Hamilton, A. F. & Grafton, S. T. Action outcomes are represented in human inferior frontoparietal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 18, 1160–1168 (2008). 10.1093/cercor/bhm150

[11]

ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain

Svenja Caspers, Karl Zilles, Angela R. Laird et al.

NeuroImage 2010 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112

[12]

Iacoboni, M. et al. Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biol. 3, e79 (2005). 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030079

[13]

Grèzes, J., Frith, C. D. & Passingham, R. E. Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 21, 744–750 (2004). 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00665-7

[14]

People thinking about thinking peopleThe role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”

R Saxe, N Kanwisher

NeuroImage 2003 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00230-1

[15]

Decety, J. & Lamm, C. The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. Neuroscientist 13, 580–593 (2007). 10.1177/1073858407304654

[16]

The role of the right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction as revealed by ALE meta-analysis

S. C. Krall, C. Rottschy, E. Oberwelland et al.

Brain Structure and Function 2015 10.1007/s00429-014-0803-z

[17]

Grèzes, J., Frith, C. & Passingham, R. E. Brain mechanisms for inferring deceit in the actions of others. J. Neurosci. 24, 5500–5505 (2004). 10.1523/jneurosci.0219-04.2004

[18]

Buccino, G. et al. The neural basis for understanding non-intended actions. NeuroImage 36, T119–T127 (2007). 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.036

[19]

Völlm, B. A. et al. Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task. NeuroImage 29, 90–98 (2006). 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.022

[20]

Takahashi, H. K. et al. Brain networks of affective mentalizing revealed by the tear effect: The integrative role of the medial prefrontal cortex and precuneus. Neurosci. Res. 101, 32–43 (2015). 10.1016/j.neures.2015.07.005

[21]

Alaerts, K. et al. Force requirements of observed object lifting are encoded by the observer’s motor system: a TMS study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 31, 1144–1153 (2010). 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07124.x

[22]

Senot, P. et al. Effect of weight-related labels on corticospinal excitability during observation of grasping: a TMS study. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 161–167 (2011). 10.1007/s00221-011-2635-x

[23]

The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory

R.C. Oldfield

Neuropsychologia 1971 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4

[24]

Spatial registration and normalization of images

Karl. J. Friston, J. Ashburner, J.‐B. Poline et al.

Human Brain Mapping 1995 10.1002/hbm.460030303

[25]

Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach

K. J. Friston, A. P. Holmes, K. J. Worsley et al.

Human Brain Mapping 1995 10.1002/hbm.460020402

[26]

Friston, K. J., Jezzard, P. & Turner, R. Analysis of functional MRI time-series. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1, 153–171 (1994). 10.1002/hbm.460010207

[27]

Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P. & Worsley, K. J. How many subjects constitute a study? NeuroImage 10, 1–5 (1999). 10.1006/nimg.1999.0439

[28]

Bonda, E., Petrides, M., Ostry, D. & Evans, A. Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J. Neurosci. 16, 3737–3744 (1996). 10.1523/jneurosci.16-11-03737.1996

[29]

Mars, R. B. et al. Connectivity-based subdivisions of the human right “temporoparietal junction area”: evidence for different areas participating in different cortical networks. Cereb. Cortex 22, 1894–1903 (2012). 10.1093/cercor/bhr268

[30]

Bzdok, D. et al. Characterization of the temporo-parietal junction by combining data-driven parcellation, complementary connectivity analyses, and functional decoding. NeuroImage 81, 381–392 (2013). 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.046

[31]

Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems

Michael D. Fox, Maurizio Corbetta, Abraham Z. Snyder et al.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006 10.1073/pnas.0604187103

[32]

O’Craven, K. M., Rosen, B. R., Kwong, K. K., Treisman, A. & Savoy, R. L. Voluntary attention modulates fMRI activity in human MT-MST. Neuron 18, 591–598 (1997). 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80300-1

[33]

Saproo, S. & Serences, J. T. Attention improves transfer of motion information between V1 and MT. J. Neurosci. 34, 3586–3596 (2014). 10.1523/jneurosci.3484-13.2014

[34]

Krall, S. C. et al. The right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37, 796–807 (2016). 10.1002/hbm.23068

[35]

Morelli, S. A. & Lieberman, M. D. The role of automaticity and attention in neural processes underlying empathy for happiness, sadness, and anxiety. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 160 (2013). 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00160

[36]

Vaina, L. M., Solomon, J., Chowdhury, S., Sinha, P. & Belliveau, J. W. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11656–11661 (2001). 10.1073/pnas.191374198

[37]

Wyk, B. C., Hudac, C. M., Carter, E. J., Sobel, D. M. & Pelphrey, K. A. Action understanding in the superior temporal sulcus region. Psychol. Sci. 20, 771–777 (2009). 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02359.x

Metrics

19

Citations

37

References

Details

Published: Jul 26, 2016
Vol/Issue: 6(1)
License: View

Authors

Department of Histology and Cell Biology , Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Takaramachi, Kanazawa, Japan

K

KAZUYUKI KANOSUE

Cite This Article

Nobuaki Mizuguchi, Hiroki Nakata, KAZUYUKI KANOSUE (2016). The right temporoparietal junction encodes efforts of others during action observation. Scientific Reports, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30274

The right temporoparietal junction encodes efforts of others during action observation

You May Also Like