journal article Open Access Sep 15, 2016

Methane storage in nanoporous material at supercritical temperature over a wide range of pressures

View at Publisher Save 10.1038/srep33461
Abstract
AbstractThe methane storage behavior in nanoporous material is significantly different from that of a bulk phase, and has a fundamental role in methane extraction from shale and its storage for vehicular applications. Here we show that the behavior and mechanisms of the methane storage are mainly dominated by the ratio of the interaction between methane molecules and nanopores walls to the methane intermolecular interaction, and a geometric constraint. By linking the macroscopic properties of the methane storage to the microscopic properties of a system of methane molecules-nanopores walls, we develop an equation of state for methane at supercritical temperature over a wide range of pressures. Molecular dynamic simulation data demonstrates that this equation is able to relate very well the methane storage behavior with each of the key physical parameters, including a pore size and shape and wall chemistry and roughness. Moreover, this equation only requires one fitted parameter, and is simple, reliable and powerful in application.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
105
[1]
Lee, R. The outlook for population growth. Science 333, 569–573 (2011). 10.1126/science.1208859
[2]
Chu, S. & Majumdar, A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 488, 294–303 (2012). 10.1038/nature11475
[3]
International Energy Agency In World Energy Outlook 2011, 546–547 http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org. (International Energy Agency, 2011).
[4]
Casco, M. E. et al. High-Pressure Methane Storage in Porous Materials: Are Carbon Materials in the Pole Position? Chem. Mater. 27, 959–964 (2015). 10.1021/cm5042524
[5]
Chang, G. et al. A microporous metal–organic framework with polarized trifluoromethyl groups for high methane storage. Chem. Commun. 51, 14789–14792 (2015). 10.1039/c5cc05850c
[6]
Brandt, A. R. et al. Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems. Science 343, 733–735 (2014). 10.1126/science.1247045
[7]
Li, B. et al. Porous metal–organic frameworks with Lewis basic nitrogen sites for high-capacity methane storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2504–2511 (2015). 10.1039/c5ee01531f
[8]
Koh, H. S., Rana, M. K., Wong-Foy, A. G. & Siegel, D. J. Predicting methane storage in open-metal-site MOFs. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 13451−13458 (2015). 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02768
[9]
Yuan, Q., Zhu, X., Lin, K. & Zhao, Y. P. Molecular dynamics simulations of the enhanced recovery of confined methane with carbon dioxide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 31887–31893 (2015). 10.1039/c5cp06649b
[10]
Service, R. F. Stepping on the gas. Science 346, 538–541 (2014). 10.1126/science.346.6209.538
[11]
Wu, H. A., Chen, J. & Liu, H. Molecular dynamics simulations about adsorption and displacement of methane in carbon nanochannels. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 13652−13657 (2015). 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02436
[12]
Alezi, D. et al. MOF crystal chemistry paving the way to gas storage needs: Aluminum-based soc-MOF for CH4, O2, and CO2 storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 13308–13318 (2015). 10.1021/jacs.5b07053
[13]
Vidic, R. D., Brantley, S. L., Vandenbossche, J. M., Yoxtheimer, D. & Abad, J. D. Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science 340, 1235009 (2013). 10.1126/science.1235009
[14]
Papaioannou, A. & Kausik, R. Methane storage in nanoporous media as observed via high-field NMR relaxometry. Physical Review Applied 4, 024018 (2015). 10.1103/physrevapplied.4.024018
[15]
Yang, R., He, S., Yi, J. & Hu, Q. Nano-scale pore structure and fractal dimension of organic-rich Wufeng-Longmaxi shale from Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin: Investigations using FE-SEM, gas adsorption and helium pycnometry. Mar. Pet. Geol. 70, 27–45 (2016). 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.11.019
[16]
Beckner, M. & Dailly, A. Adsorbed methane storage for vehicular applications. Appl Energy 149, 69–74 (2015). 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.123
[17]
Simon, C. M. et al. The materials genome in action: identifying the performance limits for methane storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1190–1199 (2015). 10.1039/c4ee03515a
[18]
Methane storage in flexible metal–organic frameworks with intrinsic thermal management

Jarad A. Mason, Julia Oktawiec, Mercedes K. Taylor et al.

Nature 2015 10.1038/nature15732
[19]
Shen, J., Sulkowski, J., Beckner, M. & Dailly, A. Effects of textural and surface characteristics of metal-organic frameworks on the methane adsorption for natural gas vehicular application. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 212, 80–90 (2015). 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.03.032
[20]
See DOE MOVE program at https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/.
[21]
Peng, Y. et al. Simultaneously high gravimetric and volumetric methane uptake characteristics of the metal–organic framework NU-111. Chem. Commun. 49, 2992–2994 (2013). 10.1039/c3cc40819a
[22]
Makal, T. A., Li, J.-R., Lu, W. & Zhou, H.-C. Methane storage in advanced porous materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 7761–7779 (2012). 10.1039/c2cs35251f
[23]
Deem, M. W., Pophale, R. & Cheeseman, P. A. A database of new zeolite-like materials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 12407–12412 (2011). 10.1039/c0cp02255a
[24]
Kim, J. et al. New materials for methane capture from dilute and medium-concentration sources. Nat. Commun. 4:1694 10.1038/ncomms2697 (2013). 10.1038/ncomms2697
[25]
Ferey, G. Hybrid porous solids: Past, present, future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 191214 (2008). 10.1039/b618320b
[26]
Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials

Omar M. Yaghi, Michael O'Keeffe, Nathan W. Ockwig et al.

Nature 2003 10.1038/nature01650
[27]
D’Alessandro, D. M., Smit, B. & Long, J. R. Carbon dioxide capture: Prospects for new materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 60586082 (2010).
[28]
High-Throughput Synthesis of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks and Application to CO 2 Capture

Rahul Banerjee, Anh Phan, Bo Wang et al.

Science 2008 10.1126/science.1152516
[29]
Wang, B., Côté, A. P., Furukawa, H., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. Colossal cages in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks as selective carbon dioxide reservoirs. Nature 453, 207–211 (2008). 10.1038/nature06900
[30]
Adisa, O. O., Cox, B. J. & Hill, J. M. Methane storage in molecular nanostructures. Nanoscale 4, 3295–3307 (2012). 10.1039/c2nr00042c
[31]
Lu, X. et al. Competitive adsorption of a binary CO2–CH4 mixture in nanoporous carbons: effects of edge-functionalization. Nanoscale 7, 1002–1012 (2015). 10.1039/c4nr05128a
[32]
Dawson, R., Cooper, A. I. & Adams, D. J. Nanoporous organic polymer networks. Prog. Polym. Sci. 37, 530–563 (2012). 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.09.002
[33]
Covalent organic frameworks

Xiao Feng, Xuesong Ding, Donglin Jiang

Chemical Society Reviews 2012 10.1039/c2cs35157a
[34]
He, Y., Zhou, W., Qian, G. & Chen, B. Methane storage in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 5657–5678 (2014). 10.1039/c4cs00032c
[35]
Peng, Y. et al. Methane storage in metal–organic frameworks: current records, surprise findings, and challenges. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11887–11894 (2013). 10.1021/ja4045289
[36]
Mason, J. A., Veenstra, M. & Long, J. R. Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for natural gas storage. Chem. Sci. 5, 32–51 (2014). 10.1039/c3sc52633j
[37]
Furukawa, H. et al. Ultrahigh porosity in metal-organic frameworks. Science 329, 424–428 (2010). 10.1126/science.1192160
[38]
Eddaoudi, M., Sava, D. F., Eubank, J. F., Adil, K. & Guillerm, V. Zeolite-like metal–organic frameworks (ZMOFs): design, synthesis, and properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 228–249 (2015). 10.1039/c4cs00230j
[39]
Stadie, N. P., Murialdo, M., Ahn, C. C. & Fultz, B. Unusual entropy of adsorbed methane on Zeolite-templated carbon. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 26409–26421 (2015). 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05021
[40]
Made-to-order metal-organic frameworks for trace carbon dioxide removal and air capture

Osama Shekhah, Youssef Belmabkhout, Zhijie Chen et al.

Nature Communications 2014 10.1038/ncomms5228
[41]
Nguyen, T. X., Bae, J. S., Wang, Y. & Bhatia, S. K. On the strength of the hydrogen− carbon interaction as deduced from physisorption. Langmuir 25, 4314–4319 (2009). 10.1021/la900220g
[42]
Bartuś, K. & Bródka, A. Temperature study of structure and dynamics of methane in carbon nanotubes.J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 12010–12016 (2014). 10.1021/jp501959r
[43]
Systematic Design of Pore Size and Functionality in Isoreticular MOFs and Their Application in Methane Storage

Mohamed Eddaoudi, Jaheon Kim, Nathaniel Rosi et al.

Science 2002 10.1126/science.1067208
[44]
Gadipelli, S. & Guo, Z. X. Graphene-based materials: Synthesis and gas sorption, storage and separation. Prog. Mater. Sci. 69, 1–60 (2015). 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.10.004
[45]
Wilmer, C. E. et al. Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Chem. 4, 83–89 (2012). 10.1038/nchem.1192
[46]
Lasich, M. & Ramjugernath, D. Influence of unlike dispersive interactions on methane adsorption in graphite: a grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation and classical density functional theory study. Eur. Phys. J. B 88, 1–10 (2015). 10.1140/epjb/e2015-60668-1
[47]
Zhang, H., Deria, P., Farha, O. K., Hupp, J. T. & Snurr, R. Q. A thermodynamic tank model for studying the effect of higher hydrocarbons on natural gas storage in metal–organic frameworks. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1501–1510 (2015). 10.1039/c5ee00808e
[48]
Talapatra, S., Zambano, A. Z., Weber, S. E. & Migone, A. D. Gases do not adsorb on the interstitial channels of closed-ended single-walled carbon nanotube bundles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 138 (2000). 10.1103/physrevlett.85.138
[49]
Rowsell, J. L., Spencer, E. C., Eckert, J., Howard, J. A. & Yaghi, O. M. Gas adsorption sites in a large-pore metal-organic framework. Science 309, 1350–1354 (2005). 10.1126/science.1113247
[50]
Cho, H. S. et al. Extra adsorption and adsorbate superlattice formation in metal-organic frameworks. Nature 527, 503–507 (2015). 10.1038/nature15734

Showing 50 of 105 references

Metrics
76
Citations
105
References
Details
Published
Sep 15, 2016
Vol/Issue
6(1)
License
View
Cite This Article
Keliu Wu, Zhangxin Chen, Xiangfang Li, et al. (2016). Methane storage in nanoporous material at supercritical temperature over a wide range of pressures. Scientific Reports, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33461