The critical role of lithium nitrate in the gas evolution of lithium–sulfur batteries

Anna Jozwiuk; Balázs B. Berkes; Thomas Weiss; Heino Sommer; Jürgen Janek; Torsten Brezesinski

doi:10.1039/c6ee00789a

journal article Jan 01, 2016

The critical role of lithium nitrate in the gas evolution of lithium–sulfur batteries

Anna Jozwiuk Balázs B. Berkes Thomas Weiss

Heino Sommer Jürgen Janek

Torsten Brezesinski

Energy Environ. Sci. Vol. 9 No. 8 pp. 2603-2608 · Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

View at Publisher Save 10.1039/c6ee00789a

Abstract

The polysulfide shuttle suppressing additive LiNO3 significantly reduces, but does not completely eliminate gassing in lithium–sulfur batteries.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

26

[1]

Evers Acc. Chem. Res. (2013) 10.1021/ar3001348

[2]

Wild Energy Environ. Sci. (2015) 10.1039/c5ee01388g

[3]

Ji Nat. Mater. (2009) 10.1038/nmat2460

[4]

Jayaprakash Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. (2011) 10.1002/anie.201100637

[5]

Lee Adv. Mater. (2013) 10.1002/adma.201301579

[6]

Song Adv. Funct. Mater. (2014) 10.1002/adfm.201302631

[7]

Schneider Chem. Mater. (2015) 10.1021/cm504460p

[8]

Zhou Nat. Commun. (2015) 10.1038/ncomms8760

[9]

Xu Adv. Energy Mater. (2015) 10.1002/aenm.201500408

[10]

Diao J. Power Sources (2013) 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.132

[11]

Moy J. Electrochem. Soc. (2015) 10.1149/2.0181501jes

[12]

Hagen J. Power Sources (2014) 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.018

[13]

Barghamadi Energy Environ. Sci. (2014) 10.1039/c4ee02192d

[14]

Aurbach J. Electrochem. Soc. (2009) 10.1149/1.3148721

[15]

Zhang J. Power Sources (2012) 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.076

[16]

Jozwiuk J. Power Sources (2015) 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.070

[17]

Hagen Adv. Energy Mater. (2015) 10.1002/aenm.201401986

[18]

Eroglu J. Electrochem. Soc. (2015) 10.1149/2.0611506jes

[19]

Han Mater. Res. Bull. (2015) 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.03.042

[20]

Xiong J. Power Sources (2014) 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.041

[21]

Berkes Anal. Chem. (2015) 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01237

[22]

Berkes Electrochem. Commun. (2015) 10.1016/j.elecom.2015.08.002

[23]

Kumaresan J. Electrochem. Soc. (2008) 10.1149/1.2937304

[24]

Zhang Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. (2015) 10.1039/c5cp03566j

[25]

Schmidt Angew. Chem. (1958) 10.1002/ange.19580701904

[26]

Hofmann J. Power Sources (2014) 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.082

Cited By

241

Contemporary Trends in Lithium‐Sulfur Battery Design: A Comparative Review of Liquid, Quasi‐Solid, and All‐Solid‐State Architectures and Mechanisms

Yiheng Shao, Boyi Pang · 2025

Advanced Energy Materials

Sulfur Cathodes with Self‐Organized Cellulose Nanofibers in Stable Ah‐Level, >300 Wh kg−1 Lithium–Sulfur Cells

Yingyi Huang, Mahdokht Shaibani · 2022

Advanced Energy Materials

2021 roadmap on lithium sulfur batteries

James B. Robinson, Kai Xi · 2021

Journal of Physics: Energy

Strategy of Enhancing the Volumetric Energy Density for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Ya‐Tao Liu, Sheng Liu · 2020

Advanced Materials

An Inorganic‐Rich Solid Electrolyte Interphase for Advanced Lithium‐Metal Batteries in Carbonate Electrolytes

Sufu Liu, Xiao Ji · 2020

Angewandte Chemie International Edi...

Sodium Metal Anodes: Emerging Solutions to Dendrite Growth

Byeongyong Lee, Eunsu Paek · 2019

Chemical Reviews

Metrics

241

Citations

26

References

Details

Published: Jan 01, 2016
Vol/Issue: 9(8)
Pages: 2603-2608

Authors

A

Anna Jozwiuk