journal article Open Access Jan 01, 2024

Evaluating diverse electrode surface patterns of 3D printed carbon thermoplastic electrochemical sensors

View at Publisher Save 10.1039/d3an01592k
Abstract
Variations in the surface patterns of 3D printed electrochemical sensor can alter the analytical performance of the sensor for the detection of analytes.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
39
[1]
Li Front. Mater. (2019) 10.3389/fmats.2018.00077
[2]
Cardoso Anal. Chim. Acta (2020) 10.1016/j.aca.2020.03.028
[3]
Richter Anal. Chem. (2019) 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02573
[4]
Gonçalves Polymers (2017) 10.3390/polym9070269
[5]
O'Neil Curr. Opin. Electrochem. (2020) 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.02.023
[6]
Ambrosi Chem. Soc. Rev. (2016) 10.1039/c5cs00714c
[7]
Manzanares Palenzuela TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. (2018) 10.1016/j.trac.2018.03.016
[8]
A review on the fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing: Filament processing, materials, and printing parameters

Ruben Bayu Kristiawan, Fitrian Imaduddin, Dody Ariawan et al.

Open Engineering 2021 10.1515/eng-2021-0063
[9]
Foo Sci. Rep. (2018) 10.1038/s41598-018-25861-3
[10]
Shergill Sci. Rep. (2023) 10.1038/s41598-023-27656-7
[11]
Hamzah Electrochem. Commun. (2018) 10.1016/j.elecom.2018.09.006
[12]
Hussain ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. (2023) 10.1021/acsapm.3c00349
[13]
Omar RSC Adv. (2021) 10.1039/d1ra01987b
[14]
Awasthi Addit. Manuf. (2021)
[15]
Shergill J. Electroanal. Chem. (2022) 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115994
[16]
Ni Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. (2017) 10.1080/05704928.2017.1287082
[17]
Penumakala Composites, Part B (2020) 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108336
[18]
A. J.Bard , L. R.Faulkner and H. S.White , Electrochemical methods: fundamentals and applications , John Wiley & Sons , 2022
[19]
Cao Carbon (2019) 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.08.064
[20]
Cao Langmuir (2021) 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03315
[21]
Menshykau J. Phys. Chem. C (2008) 10.1021/jp8047423
[22]
Ward J. Electroanal. Chem. (2013) 10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.02.012
[23]
Ward Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. (2012) 10.1039/c2cp40412e
[24]
Arvia Electrochim. Acta (1992) 10.1016/0013-4686(92)85106-u
[25]
Xu J. Mass Spectrom. (2009) 10.1002/jms.1512
[26]
Parveen J. Phys. Chem. C (2014) 10.1021/jp510469b
[27]
Kant J. Phys. Chem. C (2010) 10.1021/jp1022339
[28]
Leuaa J. Electroanal. Chem. (2020) 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114590
[29]
Zhu Mater. Chem. Phys. (2019) 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.05.034
[30]
Arenz J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2005) 10.1021/ja043602h
[31]
Dhillon Appl. Surf. Sci. (2013) 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.05.071
[32]
McCord Electrochim. Acta (2021) 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139069
[33]
Klunder J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2017) 10.1021/jacs.7b06173
[34]
Shergill ChemElectroChem (2022) 10.1002/celc.202200831
[35]
Stefano Microchimica Acta (2022) 10.1007/s00604-022-05511-2
[36]
Shergill ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. (2024) 10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c06200
[37]
Wehrhold Nanoscale (2019) 10.1039/c9nr05049c
[38]
Shergill ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. (2023) 10.1021/acsaelm.3c00862
[39]
Wirth Anal. Chem. (2019) 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01331
Metrics
23
Citations
39
References
Details
Published
Jan 01, 2024
Vol/Issue
149(5)
Pages
1502-1508
License
View
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Award: EP/V028391/1
Cite This Article
Chloe Miller, Oliver Keattch, Ricoveer S. Shergill, et al. (2024). Evaluating diverse electrode surface patterns of 3D printed carbon thermoplastic electrochemical sensors. The Analyst, 149(5), 1502-1508. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3an01592k