journal article Open Access Jan 01, 2024

A highly stable Pr2NiO4+δ oxygen electrode in electrolyte supported protonic ceramic electrolysis cells (PCECs) for hydrogen production with high faradaic efficiency

View at Publisher Save 10.1039/d3ya00542a
Abstract
This study investigates the faradaic efficiency in BaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.1Yb0.1O3−δ electrolyte supported protonic ceramic electrolysis cells (PCECs). Furthermore, excellent durability is demonstrated with a Pr2NiO4+δ oxygen electrode.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
51
[1]
Fabbri Adv. Mater. (2012) 10.1002/adma.201103102
[2]
Wang Electrochim. Acta (2023) 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142101
[3]
Bi Chem. Soc. Rev. (2014) 10.1039/c4cs00194j
[4]
Fabbri Chem. Soc. Rev. (2010) 10.1039/b902343g
[5]
Zhang Energy Sci. Eng. (2021) 10.1002/ese3.886
[6]
Kreuer Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. (2003) 10.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022802.091825
[7]
Enhanced Sulfur and Coking Tolerance of a Mixed Ion Conductor for SOFCs: BaZr 0.1 Ce 0.7 Y 0.2– x Yb x O 3–δ

Lei Yang, Shizhong Wang, Kevin Blinn et al.

Science 2009 10.1126/science.1174811
[8]
Danilov Adv. Energy Mater. (2023) 10.1002/aenm.202302175
[9]
Degradation issues and stabilization strategies of protonic ceramic electrolysis cells for steam electrolysis

Hanrui Su, Yun Hang Hu

Energy Science & Engineering 2022 10.1002/ese3.1010
[10]
Duan Nat. Energy (2019) 10.1038/s41560-019-0333-2
[11]
Duan Appl. Phys. Rev. (2020) 10.1063/1.5135319
[12]
Liang Appl. Catal., B (2023) 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122682
[13]
Li J. Power Sources (2021) 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229764
[14]
VahidMohammadi J. Electrochem. Soc. (2015) 10.1149/2.0021508jes
[15]
Choi Nat. Energy (2018) 10.1038/s41560-017-0085-9
[16]
Zhang Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. (2019) 10.1002/apj.2322
[17]
Medvedev Prog. Mater. Sci. (2016) 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.08.001
[18]
Choi Energy Environ. Sci. (2019) 10.1039/c8ee02865f
[19]
Lowering the operating temperature of protonic ceramic electrochemical cells to <450 °C

Fan Liu, Hao Deng, David Diercks et al.

Nature Energy 2023 10.1038/s41560-023-01350-4
[20]
Ding Nat. Commun. (2020) 10.1038/s41467-020-15677-z
[21]
Kim Acta Mater. (2023) 10.1016/j.actamat.2023.118800
[22]
Lim J. Electrochem. Soc. (2023) 10.1149/1945-7111/acc1a2
[23]
Niaz J. Power Sources (2021) 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230483
[24]
Zvonareva Energy Environ. Sci. (2022) 10.1039/d1ee03109k
[25]
Zhu J. Phys. Energy (2022) 10.1088/2515-7655/ac3729
[26]
Zhu J. Electrochem. Soc. (2018) 10.1149/2.0161809jes
[27]
Enhancing the Faradaic efficiency of solid oxide electrolysis cells: progress and perspective

Prashik S. Gaikwad, Kunal Mondal, Yun Kyung Shin et al.

npj Computational Materials 2023 10.1038/s41524-023-01044-1
[28]
Jin ECS Trans. (2023) 10.1149/11106.1159ecst
[29]
Zheng J. Mater. Chem. A (2023) 10.1039/d3ta01298k
[30]
Zhu Int. J. Hydrogen Energy (2021) 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.018
[31]
Mixed proton and electron conducting double perovskite anodes for stable and efficient tubular proton ceramic electrolysers

Einar Vøllestad, Ragnar Strandbakke, Mateusz Tarach et al.

Nature Materials 2019 10.1038/s41563-019-0388-2
[32]
Okuyama J. Electrochem. Soc. (2023) 10.1149/1945-7111/acef64
[33]
Papac Nat. Mater. (2021) 10.1038/s41563-020-00854-8
[34]
A 5 × 5 cm2 protonic ceramic fuel cell with a power density of 1.3 W cm–2 at 600 °C

Hyegsoon An, Hae-Weon Lee, Byung-Kook Kim et al.

Nature Energy 2018 10.1038/s41560-018-0230-0
[35]
Improved mechanical strength, proton conductivity and power density in an ‘all-protonic’ ceramic fuel cell at intermediate temperature

Abul K. Azad, Abdalla M. Abdalla, Ahmed Afif et al.

Scientific Reports 2021 10.1038/s41598-021-98987-6
[36]
Zr and Y co-doped perovskite as a stable, high performance cathode for solid oxide fuel cells operating below 500 °C

Chuancheng Duan, David Hook, Yachao Chen et al.

Energy Environ. Sci. 2017 10.1039/c6ee01915c
[37]
Rajendran ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2020) 10.1021/acsami.0c12532
[38]
Choi Sci. Rep. (2013) 10.1038/srep02426
[39]
Li J. Mater. Chem. A (2018) 10.1039/c8ta04018d
[40]
Grimaud J. Electrochem. Soc. (2012) 10.1149/2.101205jes
[41]
Tian ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2020) 10.1021/acsami.0c12987
[42]
Perovskites for protonic ceramic fuel cells: a review

Jiafeng Cao, Yuexia Ji, Zongping Shao

Energy Environ. Sci. 2022 10.1039/d2ee00132b
[43]
Dailly J. Solid State Electrochem. (2011) 10.1007/s10008-010-1188-4
[44]
Vibhu J. Power Sources (2021) 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228909
[45]
Unachukwu J. Power Sources (2023) 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232436
[46]
Vibhu Energies (2022) 10.3390/en15082726
[47]
Tucker J. Power Sources (2011) 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.044
[48]
Foit Processes (2020) 10.3390/pr8111390
[49]
Stuart Solid State Ionics (2008) 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.01.067
[50]
Bausá J. CO2 Util. (2019) 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.05.037

Showing 50 of 51 references

Metrics
16
Citations
51
References
Details
Published
Jan 01, 2024
Vol/Issue
3(4)
Pages
861-873
License
View
Cite This Article
Leon Schley, Vaibhav Vibhu, Lucy Nohl, et al. (2024). A highly stable Pr2NiO4+δ oxygen electrode in electrolyte supported protonic ceramic electrolysis cells (PCECs) for hydrogen production with high faradaic efficiency. Energy Advances, 3(4), 861-873. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ya00542a