NIMROD resistive magnetohydrodynamic simulations of spheromak physics

E. B. Hooper; B. I. Cohen; H. S. McLean; R. D. Wood; C. A. Romero-Talamás; C. R. Sovinec

doi:10.1063/1.2890772

journal article Mar 01, 2008

NIMROD resistive magnetohydrodynamic simulations of spheromak physics

E. B. Hooper B. I. Cohen H. S. McLean R. D. Wood C. A. Romero-Talamás C. R. Sovinec

Physics of Plasmas Vol. 15 No. 3 · AIP Publishing

View at Publisher Save 10.1063/1.2890772

Abstract

The physics of spheromak plasmas is addressed by time-dependent, three-dimensional, resistive magnetohydrodynamic simulations with the NIMROD code [C. R. Sovinec et al., J. Comput. Phys. 195, 355 (2004)]. Included in some detail are the formation of a spheromak driven electrostatically by a coaxial plasma gun with a flux-conserver geometry and power systems that accurately model the sustained spheromak physics experiment [R. D. Wood et al., Nucl. Fusion 45, 1582 (2005)]. The controlled decay of the spheromak plasma over several milliseconds is also modeled as the programmable current and voltage relax, resulting in simulations of entire experimental pulses. Reconnection phenomena and the effects of current profile evolution on the growth of symmetry-breaking toroidal modes are diagnosed; these in turn affect the quality of magnetic surfaces and the energy confinement. The sensitivity of the simulation results addresses variations in both physical and numerical parameters, including spatial resolution. There are significant points of agreement between the simulations and the observed experimental behavior, e.g., in the evolution of the magnetics and the sensitivity of the energy confinement to the presence of symmetry-breaking magnetic fluctuations.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

26

[1]

Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion (1994) 10.1088/0741-3335/36/6/002

[2]

Phys. Rev. Lett. (1983) 10.1103/physrevlett.51.39

[3]

Nucl. Fusion (2005) 10.1088/0029-5515/45/12/013

[4]

Phys. Rev. Lett. (2002) 10.1103/physrevlett.88.125004

[5]

(2003)

[6]

[7]

Phys. Plasmas (2001) 10.1063/1.1335585

[8]

Nucl. Fusion (2003) 10.1088/0029-5515/43/10/025

[9]

Phys. Rev. Lett. (2005) 10.1103/physrevlett.94.035003

[10]

Phys. Plasmas (2005) 10.1063/1.1869501

[11]

Phys. Plasmas (2005) 10.1063/1.2040207

[12]

J. Comput. Phys. (2004) 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.10.004

[13]

Leontovich (1965)

[14]

Phys. Plasmas (2006) 10.1063/1.2192469

[15]

Phys. Plasmas (2005) 10.1063/1.2030367

[16]

Nucl. Fusion (2007) 10.1088/0029-5515/47/8/042

[17]

Phys. Rev. Lett. (2003) 10.1103/physrevlett.91.095001

[18]

Phys. Rev. Lett. (2004) 10.1103/physrevlett.93.205002

[19]

Phys. Plasmas (2005) 10.1063/1.1878772

[20]

J. Fusion Energy (2007) 10.1007/s10894-006-9040-7

[21]

[22]

(1965)

[23]

Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion (2006) 10.1088/0741-3335/48/2/005

[24]

J. Nucl. Mater. (2000) 10.1016/s0022-3115(99)00217-2

[25]

Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. (2007)

[26]

Phys. Plasmas (2004) 10.1063/1.1645520

Metrics

22

Citations

26

References

Details

Published: Mar 01, 2008
Vol/Issue: 15(3)

Authors

E

E. B. Hooper