journal article Jan 01, 2011

Applying the Helmholtz Illusion to Fashion: Horizontal Stripes Won't Make You Look Fatter

i-Perception Vol. 2 No. 1 pp. 69-76 · SAGE Publications
Abstract
A square composed of horizontal lines appears taller and narrower than an identical square made up of vertical lines. Reporting this illusion, Hermann von Helmholtz noted that such illusions, in which filled space seems to be larger than unfilled space, were common in everyday life, adding the observation that ladies' frocks with horizontal stripes make the figure look taller. As this assertion runs counter to modern popular belief, we have investigated whether vertical or horizontal stripes on clothing should make the wearer appear taller or fatter. We find that a rectangle of vertical stripes needs to be extended by 7.1% vertically to match the height of a square of horizontal stripes and that a rectangle of horizontal stripes must be made 4.5% wider than a square of vertical stripes to match its perceived width. This illusion holds when the horizontal or vertical lines are on the dress of a line drawing of a woman. We have examined the claim that these effects apply only for 2-dimensional figures in an experiment with 3-D cylinders and find no support for the notion that horizontal lines would be ‘fattening’ on clothes. Significantly, the illusion persists when the horizontal or vertical lines are on pictures of a real half-body mannequin viewed stereoscopically. All the evidence supports Helmholtz's original assertion.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
12
[1]
Coren S (1978)
[3]
Dodgson N A “Variation and extrema of human interpupillary distance” (2004)
[4]
Feldon L (2000)
[5]
v Helmholtz H (1867)
[10]
Robinson J O (1972)
Metrics
31
Citations
12
References
Details
Published
Jan 01, 2011
Vol/Issue
2(1)
Pages
69-76
License
View
Cite This Article
Peter Thompson, Kyriaki Mikellidou (2011). Applying the Helmholtz Illusion to Fashion: Horizontal Stripes Won't Make You Look Fatter. i-Perception, 2(1), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0405