journal article Jan 01, 2008

Targeted technologies for nitrous oxide abatement from animal agriculture

Abstract
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions account for ~10% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with most of these emissions (~90%) deriving from agricultural practices. Animal agriculture potentially contributes up to 50% of total agricultural N2O emissions. In intensive animal agriculture, high N2O emission rates generally coincide with anaerobic soil conditions and high soil NO3–, primarily from animal urine patches. This paper provides an overview of animal, feed-based and soil or management abatement technologies for ruminant animal agriculture targeted at reducing the size of the soil NO3– pool or improving soil aeration. Direct measurements of N2O emissions from potential animal and feed-based intervention technologies are scarce. However, studies have shown that they have the potential to reduce urinary N excretion by 3–60% and thus reduce associated N2O emissions. Research on the effect of soil and water management interventions is generally further advanced and N2O reduction potentials of up to 90% have been measured in some instances. Of the currently available technologies, nitrification inhibitors, managing animal diets and fertiliser management show the best potential for reducing emissions in the short-term. However, strategies should always be evaluated in a whole-system context, to ensure that reductions in one part of the system do not stimulate higher emissions elsewhere. Current technologies reviewed here could deliver up to 50% reduction from an animal housing system, but only up to 15% from a grazing-based system. However, given that enteric methane emissions form the majority of emissions from grazing systems, a 15% abatement of N2O is likely to translate to a 2–4% decrease in total GHG emissions at a farm scale. Clearly, further research is needed to develop technologies for improving N cycling and reducing N2O emissions from grazing-based animal production systems.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
43
[1]
Amon Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (2006) 10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.030
[2]
Aulakh Advances in Soil Science (1992) 10.1007/978-1-4612-2844-8_1
[3]
Carulla Australian Journal of Agricultural Research (2005) 10.1071/ar05022
[4]
Clemens Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems (2001) 10.1023/a:1017562603343
[5]
Clemens Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (2006) 10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.016
[6]
Clough Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems (2007) 10.1007/s10705-006-9069-z
[7]
Crush Grass and Forage Science (2007) 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2007.00583.x
[8]
de Klein Environmental Sciences: Journal of Integrative Environmental Research (2005) 10.1080/15693430500402549
[9]
de Klein Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand (2001) 10.1080/03014223.2001.9517667
[10]
de Klein Australian Journal of Soil Research (2003) 10.1071/sr02128
[11]
de Klein Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (2006) 10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.019
[12]
Di Soil Use and Management (2002) 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2002.tb00258.x
[13]
Di Soil Use and Management (2003) 10.1079/sum2003207
[14]
Di Biology and Fertility of Soils (2006) 10.1007/s00374-005-0038-5
[15]
Di Soil Use and Management (2007) 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00057.x
[16]
Douglas Grass and Forage Science (1991) 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1991.tb02401.x
[17]
Drewry Australian Journal of Soil Research (2004) 10.1071/sr03169
[18]
Eckard Australian Journal of Agricultural Research (2003) 10.1071/ar02100
[19]
Eckard International Congress Series (2006) 10.1016/j.ics.2006.01.027
[20]
Fenner Soil Biology & Biochemistry (2005) 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.02.032
[21]
Firestone Science (1980) 10.1126/science.208.4445.749
[22]
Galbally Environmental Sciences (2005) 10.1080/15693430500395396
[23]
Granli Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences (1994)
[24]
Her Bioresource Technology (1995) 10.1016/0960-8524(95)00113-1
[25]
Jordan Journal of Environmental Management (1985)
[26]
Kool Soil Biology & Biochemistry (2006) 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.017
[27]
Ledgard Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (2007)
[28]
Ledgard Proceedings of the New Zealand Grasslands Association (2007)
[29]
Luo Soil Use and Management (2007)
[30]
Miller Grass and Forage Science (2001) 10.1046/j.1365-2494.2001.00288.x
[31]
Misselbrook Journal of Dairy Science (2005) 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)72851-4
[32]
Monaghan Journal of Environmental Management (2007)
[33]
Mosier Environmental Biogeochemistry Ecology Bulletin (1983)
[34]
Oenema Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems (2005) 10.1007/s10705-004-7354-2
[35]
Phillips Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (2007) 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.11.011
[36]
Saggar New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research (2004) 10.1080/00288233.2004.9513618
[37]
Satter Journal of Animal Science (2002) 10.2527/animalsci2002.80e-suppl_2e143x
[38]
Schils Global Change Biology (2006) 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01090.x
[39]
Smith New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research (2007)
[40]
Stevens Soil Science Society of America Journal (2002) 10.2136/sssaj2002.6470
[41]
Subbarao Plant and Soil (2006) 10.1007/s11104-006-9094-3
[42]
van Groenigen Plant and Soil (2005) 10.1007/s11104-004-6261-2
[43]
van Vuuren Journal of Dairy Science (1993) 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(93)77637-7
Cited By
142
Science of The Total Environment
Environmental Research Letters
Annals of Applied Biology
Journal of the Science of Food and...
Metrics
142
Citations
43
References
Details
Published
Jan 01, 2008
Vol/Issue
48(2)
Pages
14
Cite This Article
C. A. M. de Klein, R. J. Eckard (2008). Targeted technologies for nitrous oxide abatement from animal agriculture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 48(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea07217