A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys

M.H. Loke; Ian Acworth; Torleif Dahlin

doi:10.1071/eg03182

journal article Jun 01, 2003

A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys

M.H. Loke Ian Acworth Torleif Dahlin

Exploration Geophysics Vol. 34 No. 3 pp. 182-187 · Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists

View at Publisher Save 10.1071/eg03182

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

6

[1]

Acworth, R.I., 1981, The evaluation of groundwater resources in the crystalline basement of Northern Nigeria : Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham (U.K).

[2]

Bassrei, A., and Quezada, J., 2001, Inversion of seismic data by a generalized maximum entropy method: 71 st Ann. Internat. Meeting, Soc. of Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts , 744–747. 10.1190/1.1816738

[3]

Menke, W., 1989, Geophysical Data Analysis:Discrete Inverse Theory : Academic Press.

[4]

Parker, R.L., 1994, Geophysical Inverse Theory : Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9780691206837

[5]

Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., and Flannery, 1992, Numerical Recipes in C (2nd edition) : Cambridge University Press.

[6]

Witherly, K.E., and Vyselaar, J., 1990, A geophysical case history of the Poplar Lake Copper-Molybdenum deposit, Houston Area, British Columbia: in Fink, J.B., McAlister, E.O., Sternberg, B.K., Wieduwilt, W.G., and Ward, S.H. (Eds), 1990, Induced Polarization: Applications and Case Histories , Investigations in Geophysics No. 4, SEG.

Cited By

731

Epikarst mapping by remote sensing

Eulogio Pardo-Igúzquiza, Peter A. Dowd · 2018

CATENA

Metrics

731

Citations

6

References

Details

Published: Jun 01, 2003
Vol/Issue: 34(3)
Pages: 182-187

Authors

Engineering Geology, Lund University, Box 118, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden

Cite This Article

M.H. Loke, Ian Acworth, Torleif Dahlin (2003). A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys. Exploration Geophysics, 34(3), 182-187. https://doi.org/10.1071/eg03182

A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys

You May Also Like