journal article Jul 14, 2009

Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world's most carbon-dense forests

View at Publisher Save 10.1073/pnas.0901970106
Abstract
From analysis of published global site biomass data (
n
= 136) from primary forests, we discovered (
i
) the world's highest known total biomass carbon density (living plus dead) of 1,867 tonnes carbon per ha (average value from 13 sites) occurs in Australian temperate moist
Eucalyptus regnans
forests, and (
ii
) average values of the global site biomass data were higher for sampled temperate moist forests (
n
= 44) than for sampled tropical (
n
= 36) and boreal (
n
= 52) forests (
n
is number of sites per forest biome). Spatially averaged Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change biome default values are lower than our average site values for temperate moist forests, because the temperate biome contains a diversity of forest ecosystem types that support a range of mature carbon stocks or have a long land-use history with reduced carbon stocks. We describe a framework for identifying forests important for carbon storage based on the factors that account for high biomass carbon densities, including (
i
) relatively cool temperatures and moderately high precipitation producing rates of fast growth but slow decomposition, and (
ii
) older forests that are often multiaged and multilayered and have experienced minimal human disturbance. Our results are relevant to negotiations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change regarding forest conservation, management, and restoration. Conserving forests with large stocks of biomass from deforestation and degradation avoids significant carbon emissions to the atmosphere, irrespective of the source country, and should be among allowable mitigation activities. Similarly, management that allows restoration of a forest's carbon sequestration potential also should be recognized.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
66
[1]
, eds RK Pachauri, A Reisinger (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva The Fourth Assessment Report Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III. (2007).
[2]
2008).
[3]
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Specification of National Reporting Tables for FRA 2010. Forest Resources Assessment Programme Working Paper 135 (Forestry Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, New York, 2007).
[4]
, eds S Eggleston, L Buendia, K Miwa, T Ngara, K Tanabe (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Kanagawa, Japan Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Vol. 4 Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, 2006).
[5]
Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality

Holly K Gibbs, Sandra Brown, John O Niles et al.

Environmental Research Letters 10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023
[7]
Responsible Management of Planted Forests: Voluntary Guidelines. Planted Forests and Trees Working Paper 37/E (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2006).
[8]
Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: Article 2.1.a.iii (United Nations, New York, 1998).
[10]
J Melillo, IC Prentice, GD Farquhar, ED Schulze, OE Sala, Terrestrial biotic responses to environmental change and feedbacks to climate. Climate Change: The Science of Climate Change, eds JT Houghton, et al. (Cambridge Univ Press, New York), pp. 444–481 (1995).
[16]
HK Gibbs, S Brown Geographical Distribution of Woody Biomass Carbon Stocks in Tropical Africa: An Updated Database for 2000 (Carbon Dioxide Information Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 2007).
[17]
D Bryant, D Nielsen, L Tangley Last Frontier Forests: Ecosystems and Economies on the Edge (World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, 1997).
[18]
RK Gupta, DLN Rao, Potential of wastelands for sequestering carbon by reforestation. Curr Sci 66, 378–380 (1994).
[21]
DB Lindenmayer, J Franklin, PJ Burton Salvage Logging and Its Ecological Impacts (Island Press, Washington, DC, 2008).
[22]
T Fujimori, S Kawanabe, H Saito, CC Grier, T Shidei, Biomass and primary production in forests of three major vegetation zones of the Northwestern United States. J Jap For Soc 58, 360–373 (1976).
[30]
P Romero, E Neira, A Lara Forest Cover and Carbon Changes in Coastal Temperate Rainforest, Chile (Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile and The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, 2007).
[36]
H Lieth, Modeling the primary productivity of the world. Trop Ecol 13, 125–130 (1972).
[43]
C Dean, S Roxburgh, BG Mackey, Growth modeling of Eucalyptus regnans for carbon accounting at the landscape scale. Modeling Forest Systems, eds A Amaro, D Reed, P Soares (ACBI, Wallingford, UK), pp. 27–40 (2003).
[44]
J Illic, D Boland, M McDonald, G Downes, P Blakemore Wood Density: Phase 1 State of Knowledge (Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, National Carbon Accounting System Technical Report 18. (2000).
[45]
MR Jacobs Growth Habits of the Eucalypts (Forestry and Timber Bureau, Canberra, Australia, 1955).

Showing 50 of 66 references

Cited By
741
GIScience & Remote Sensing
Science of The Total Environment
Operational resilience in western US frequent-fire forests

Malcolm P. North, Ryan E. Tompkins · 2022

Forest Ecology and Management
Human impacts as the main driver of tropical forest carbon

Marcela Venelli Pyles, Luiz Fernando Silva Magnago · 2022

Science Advances
Proceedings of the National Academy...
Environmental Reviews
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution...
Seagrass ecosystems as a globally significant carbon stock

James W. Fourqurean, Carlos M. Duarte · 2012

Nature Geoscience
Metrics
741
Citations
66
References
Details
Published
Jul 14, 2009
Vol/Issue
106(28)
Pages
11635-11640
Cite This Article
Heather Keith, Brendan G. Mackey, David B. Lindenmayer (2009). Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world's most carbon-dense forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(28), 11635-11640. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901970106